Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if more kids at Woodward are supposed to come from WJ or the DCC, or both in equal amount?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.
WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.
and BCC which is also adjacent
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if more kids at Woodward are supposed to come from WJ or the DCC, or both in equal amount?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone has a BCC boundary fetish.![]()
Perhaps, but what they're saying is nevertheless true.
BCC is fine with their kids sitting on a cell tower gas generator to watch lacrosse games. They will be perfect for Woodward.
If they live closer to Woodward they'd be Woodward kids not BCC kids. We're all for a neighborhood schools right?
The only part of the BCC zone that would be closer to Woodward than it is to BCC is the very northernmost bit, and that bit is actually closer to Einstein than it is to Woodward, or BCC.
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/BCCHS.pdf
I would think most of the Western third of Einstein's boundary is going to land at Woodward to help with overcrowding. BCC's recent addition probably reduced any overcrowding there for the time being but it's possible some minor changes to its northern boundary could indirectly help with overcrowding at other nearby schools. In the end, we really don't know how this will play out, but I don't think it's anything to stress about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone has a BCC boundary fetish.![]()
Perhaps, but what they're saying is nevertheless true.
BCC is fine with their kids sitting on a cell tower gas generator to watch lacrosse games. They will be perfect for Woodward.
If they live closer to Woodward they'd be Woodward kids not BCC kids. We're all for a neighborhood schools right?
The only part of the BCC zone that would be closer to Woodward than it is to BCC is the very northernmost bit, and that bit is actually closer to Einstein than it is to Woodward, or BCC.
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/BCCHS.pdf
I would think most of the Western third of Einstein's boundary is going to land at Woodward to help with overcrowding. BCC's recent addition probably reduced any overcrowding there for the time being but it's possible some minor changes to its northern boundary could indirectly help with overcrowding at other nearby schools. In the end, we really don't know how this will play out, but I don't think it's anything to stress about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone has a BCC boundary fetish.![]()
Perhaps, but what they're saying is nevertheless true.
BCC is fine with their kids sitting on a cell tower gas generator to watch lacrosse games. They will be perfect for Woodward.
If they live closer to Woodward they'd be Woodward kids not BCC kids. We're all for a neighborhood schools right?
The only part of the BCC zone that would be closer to Woodward than it is to BCC is the very northernmost bit, and that bit is actually closer to Einstein than it is to Woodward, or BCC.
https://gis.mcpsmd.org/ServiceAreaMaps/BCCHS.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone has a BCC boundary fetish.![]()
Perhaps, but what they're saying is nevertheless true.
BCC is fine with their kids sitting on a cell tower gas generator to watch lacrosse games. They will be perfect for Woodward.
If they live closer to Woodward they'd be Woodward kids not BCC kids. We're all for a neighborhood schools right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone has a BCC boundary fetish.![]()
Perhaps, but what they're saying is nevertheless true.
BCC is fine with their kids sitting on a cell tower gas generator to watch lacrosse games. They will be perfect for Woodward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone has a BCC boundary fetish.![]()
Perhaps, but what they're saying is nevertheless true.
Anonymous wrote:Someone has a BCC boundary fetish.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.
WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.
and BCC which is also adjacent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where do you think the Woodward students will be pulled from? Brace yourselves for a shock.
WJ, Wheaton, and Einstein. That's it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who will be going to this school? Are the parents and students that will go there happy with the cell thypothesized.
oing to be put on the baseball field and the clear cutting of all the trees on the property?
Students from adjacent schools like Walter Johnson, Einstein, and BCC.
You keep posting this misinformation. It's been clearly stated for years now that Woodward is being reopened to relieve overcrowding at WJ and the DCC high schools.
The misuse of "misinformation," and overuse, is like nails on a chalkboard. Please write better, for example: "That's not correct." Misinformation denotes a malicious intent to trick people into believing falsities. It's different than just being wrong.
Yes, by shifting students from BCC to the new Woodward they can extend BCC's boundary eastward to reduce overcrowding at its adjacent DCC schools. It's not hard to understand.
The only DCC school remotely adjacent to BCC is Blair. Blair is overcrowded, but relieving the overcrowding there is the point of the expansion and renovation of Northwood. Einstein is also severely overcrowded, and moving kids out of BCC into Woodward does nothing to alleviate that overcrowding.