Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But it was white kids. And I'm sure we can all agree it was wrong, regardless of their race or economic status. Again, why can't we talk about this truthfully without making it political?And did you call out the posters blaming this on "white kids" and obviously trying to make it political? No? Didn't think so.
NP. How do you know it was white kids? Was there video? I'm a non-white Georgetown undergrad alum. If you are implying that Georgetown students = white students without some extrinsic evidence that the particular students involved were white, that is offensive.
Anonymous wrote:But it was white kids. And I'm sure we can all agree it was wrong, regardless of their race or economic status. Again, why can't we talk about this truthfully without making it political?And did you call out the posters blaming this on "white kids" and obviously trying to make it political? No? Didn't think so.
Anonymous wrote:
OK twit, if leaving behind trash is always inappropriate than it's wrong, just like this. Both can be true, why is this so hard for a hardheaded twit like you to understand?
Anonymous wrote:But it was white kids. And I'm sure we can all agree it was wrong, regardless of their race or economic status. Again, why can't we talk about this truthfully without making it political?And did you call out the posters blaming this on "white kids" and obviously trying to make it political? No? Didn't think so.
But it was white kids. And I'm sure we can all agree it was wrong, regardless of their race or economic status. Again, why can't we talk about this truthfully without making it political?And did you call out the posters blaming this on "white kids" and obviously trying to make it political? No? Didn't think so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OK twit, if leaving behind trash is always inappropriate than it's wrong, just like this. Both can be true, why is this so hard for a hardheaded twit like you to understand?
Because thoughtlessly leaving behind trash is not even on the same level as the defacement of national memorials. The OP (you?) would have us believe this is what occurred the other night - when nothing of the sort did. Maybe a little perspective - or rather, honesty - if you can muster it?
Why the escalation and politicization? OP posted about this trashing the memorial, not about vandalism. Can't we agree that this was bad form without bringing in other more extreme examples or trying to make a political statement? Why are there 10 pages of mostly blasting OP. OK, maybe she was a bit dramatic, but it's still rude and shameful. I heard about it on the radio as well, so it's not like OK saw a little trash and freaked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OK twit, if leaving behind trash is always inappropriate than it's wrong, just like this. Both can be true, why is this so hard for a hardheaded twit like you to understand?
Because thoughtlessly leaving behind trash is not even on the same level as the defacement of national memorials. The OP (you?) would have us believe this is what occurred the other night - when nothing of the sort did. Maybe a little perspective - or rather, honesty - if you can muster it?[/quote]
Not OP and same can be said for you? Both can be wrong and leaving behind massive amounts of trash including broken glass, spilled wine etc. is vandalism which is defined as "willful or malicious damage or destruction of the property of another." Just because you think it does not rise to the same level as the example you showed does not make it so. Calling people twits because they feel differently from you is pathetic, take a seat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OK twit, if leaving behind trash is always inappropriate than it's wrong, just like this. Both can be true, why is this so hard for a hardheaded twit like you to understand?
Because thoughtlessly leaving behind trash is not even on the same level as the defacement of national memorials. The OP (you?) would have us believe this is what occurred the other night - when nothing of the sort did. Maybe a little perspective - or rather, honesty - if you can muster it?
Anonymous wrote:
OK twit, if leaving behind trash is always inappropriate than it's wrong, just like this. Both can be true, why is this so hard for a hardheaded twit like you to understand?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Christ, people seem more fired up this than about the storming of the Capitol and killing of a police officer.
Such irony.
There is one poster that trashes GU any chance he/she gets. The fact of the matter is that post-graduation college celebrations involve a lot of booze and a lot of a trash no matter where the University is located.
This was very mild to the destruction that happened in the college town where my University was located.
Some trash and broken bottles---have you ever been to the National Mall after a 4th of July Celebration?
Now if they had spray painted Lincoln or the steps I would agree with you. This was broken bottles. You can't even walk down parts of DC or NYC in the middle of the day without stepping around those.
I suggest you come to Clarendon on a Sunday morning and see what the JMU, Tech and UVA students leave behind in their all night partying---and these are post-college professionals.
And it took the maintenance staff less than an hour to clean up -- the word "trash" was taken way out of context; they didn't trash the memorial, there was some trash left behind. They should have carried it out with them like good scouts, but they didn't "trash the Lincoln Memorial."
Let the maintenance staff do their jobs, i.e. clean up after ahole grads
You sound like a peach