Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. I don't want my kid to me a mom as an undergraduate. Schools like Washington University are totally out now that Missouri is criminalizing abortions for people who become pregnant in Missouri regardless of where the procedure is preformed.
Maybe tell her not to sleep around?
+1. It’s like they are expecting their daughters to get pregnant and that it’s routine.
How many women in college have boyfriends? Do you think they just hold hands?
How many women in college haven’t heard of condoms? Do you think they don’t have access to stores?
How effective are condoms? Not something any woman should stake her future on.
Birth control is very effective. Guess you haven’t heard if that. Condoms are effective and if you use the argument that a girl should not stake her future on, then you are effectively saying she would be better off without the condom. Not logical.
How many times in a given week do you suppose the average college couple has intercourse? That's a lot of room for failure.
How many girls do you know have gotten pregnant in college?
Among my friends in college, more than zero
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. I don't want my kid to me a mom as an undergraduate. Schools like Washington University are totally out now that Missouri is criminalizing abortions for people who become pregnant in Missouri regardless of where the procedure is preformed.
Maybe tell her not to sleep around?
+1. It’s like they are expecting their daughters to get pregnant and that it’s routine.
How many women in college have boyfriends? Do you think they just hold hands?
How many women in college haven’t heard of condoms? Do you think they don’t have access to stores?
How effective are condoms? Not something any woman should stake her future on.
Birth control is very effective. Guess you haven’t heard if that. Condoms are effective and if you use the argument that a girl should not stake her future on, then you are effectively saying she would be better off without the condom. Not logical.
How many times in a given week do you suppose the average college couple has intercourse? That's a lot of room for failure.
How many girls do you know have gotten pregnant in college?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. I don't want my kid to me a mom as an undergraduate. Schools like Washington University are totally out now that Missouri is criminalizing abortions for people who become pregnant in Missouri regardless of where the procedure is preformed.
Maybe tell her not to sleep around?
+1. It’s like they are expecting their daughters to get pregnant and that it’s routine.
How many women in college have boyfriends? Do you think they just hold hands?
How many women in college haven’t heard of condoms? Do you think they don’t have access to stores?
How effective are condoms? Not something any woman should stake her future on.
Birth control is very effective. Guess you haven’t heard if that. Condoms are effective and if you use the argument that a girl should not stake her future on, then you are effectively saying she would be better off without the condom. Not logical.
How many times in a given week do you suppose the average college couple has intercourse? That's a lot of room for failure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the only way to fix this is to force boys to get snipped
It is reversible for when BOTH partners are on board with procreating
Problem solved
I know this is a popular response, but it undermines the case that reproductive health decisions should be made by individuals and their doctors, not government. Forcible sterilization isn’t funny, even when it’s happening to men.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. I don't want my kid to me a mom as an undergraduate. Schools like Washington University are totally out now that Missouri is criminalizing abortions for people who become pregnant in Missouri regardless of where the procedure is preformed.
Maybe tell her not to sleep around?
+1. It’s like they are expecting their daughters to get pregnant and that it’s routine.
How many women in college have boyfriends? Do you think they just hold hands?
How many women in college haven’t heard of condoms? Do you think they don’t have access to stores?
How effective are condoms? Not something any woman should stake her future on.
Birth control is very effective. Guess you haven’t heard if that. Condoms are effective and if you use the argument that a girl should not stake her future on, then you are effectively saying she would be better off without the condom. Not logical.
Ooooh yikes. Speaking of not logical.....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. I don't want my kid to me a mom as an undergraduate. Schools like Washington University are totally out now that Missouri is criminalizing abortions for people who become pregnant in Missouri regardless of where the procedure is preformed.
Maybe tell her not to sleep around?
+1. It’s like they are expecting their daughters to get pregnant and that it’s routine.
How many women in college have boyfriends? Do you think they just hold hands?
How many women in college haven’t heard of condoms? Do you think they don’t have access to stores?
How effective are condoms? Not something any woman should stake her future on.
Birth control is very effective. Guess you haven’t heard if that. Condoms are effective and if you use the argument that a girl should not stake her future on, then you are effectively saying she would be better off without the condom. Not logical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. I don't want my kid to me a mom as an undergraduate. Schools like Washington University are totally out now that Missouri is criminalizing abortions for people who become pregnant in Missouri regardless of where the procedure is preformed.
Maybe tell her not to sleep around?
+1. It’s like they are expecting their daughters to get pregnant and that it’s routine.
How many women in college have boyfriends? Do you think they just hold hands?
How many women in college haven’t heard of condoms? Do you think they don’t have access to stores?
How effective are condoms? Not something any woman should stake her future on.
Birth control is very effective. Guess you haven’t heard if that. Condoms are effective and if you use the argument that a girl should not stake her future on, then you are effectively saying she would be better off without the condom. Not logical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I am an outlier, but not planning on my kid getting pregnant at college. But I'm in full support of banning abortion after 15 weeks- I have trouble how parents feel otherwise. You KNOW what this fetus becomes. At 15 weeks we know enough that the fetus is capable of feeling, so really don't understand how people can be pro-abortion at this point. Totally understand f-ups happen and the women shouldn't bear the brunt of it for life if they aren't ready but 15 weeks is plenty of time to stop things before it turns into a human that feels pain.
What specifically are you doing to help prevent an unplanned pregnancy when your adult child is in college? Abstinence only answers not accepted.
Birth control pills. But if they did get pregnant, they would't be waiting months to have an abortion.
They will probably be outlawed next because they “kill.”
Can you stop with the outlandish reach?
Griswold rests on the same logic as Roe and Casey. The same people who were saying that worrying about Roe being overturned were reaching are now saying that worrying about the logical consequences is a reach
This won’t be the first time you’ve been called a drama queen, right?
This won't be the first time you have been called an idiot, correct?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. I don't want my kid to me a mom as an undergraduate. Schools like Washington University are totally out now that Missouri is criminalizing abortions for people who become pregnant in Missouri regardless of where the procedure is preformed.
Maybe tell her not to sleep around?
+1. It’s like they are expecting their daughters to get pregnant and that it’s routine.
How many women in college have boyfriends? Do you think they just hold hands?
How many women in college haven’t heard of condoms? Do you think they don’t have access to stores?
How effective are condoms? Not something any woman should stake her future on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I am an outlier, but not planning on my kid getting pregnant at college. But I'm in full support of banning abortion after 15 weeks- I have trouble how parents feel otherwise. You KNOW what this fetus becomes. At 15 weeks we know enough that the fetus is capable of feeling, so really don't understand how people can be pro-abortion at this point. Totally understand f-ups happen and the women shouldn't bear the brunt of it for life if they aren't ready but 15 weeks is plenty of time to stop things before it turns into a human that feels pain.
What specifically are you doing to help prevent an unplanned pregnancy when your adult child is in college? Abstinence only answers not accepted.
Birth control pills. But if they did get pregnant, they would't be waiting months to have an abortion.
They will probably be outlawed next because they “kill.”
Can you stop with the outlandish reach?
Griswold rests on the same logic as Roe and Casey. The same people who were saying that worrying about Roe being overturned were reaching are now saying that worrying about the logical consequences is a reach
This won’t be the first time you’ve been called a drama queen, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. I don't want my kid to me a mom as an undergraduate. Schools like Washington University are totally out now that Missouri is criminalizing abortions for people who become pregnant in Missouri regardless of where the procedure is preformed.
Maybe tell her not to sleep around?
+1. It’s like they are expecting their daughters to get pregnant and that it’s routine.
How many women in college have boyfriends? Do you think they just hold hands?
How many women in college haven’t heard of condoms? Do you think they don’t have access to stores?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I am an outlier, but not planning on my kid getting pregnant at college. But I'm in full support of banning abortion after 15 weeks- I have trouble how parents feel otherwise. You KNOW what this fetus becomes. At 15 weeks we know enough that the fetus is capable of feeling, so really don't understand how people can be pro-abortion at this point. Totally understand f-ups happen and the women shouldn't bear the brunt of it for life if they aren't ready but 15 weeks is plenty of time to stop things before it turns into a human that feels pain.
What specifically are you doing to help prevent an unplanned pregnancy when your adult child is in college? Abstinence only answers not accepted.
Birth control pills. But if they did get pregnant, they would't be waiting months to have an abortion.
They will probably be outlawed next because they “kill.”
Can you stop with the outlandish reach?
Griswold rests on the same logic as Roe and Casey. The same people who were saying that worrying about Roe being overturned were reaching are now saying that worrying about the logical consequences is a reach