Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's with all the posts about Davidson all of a sudden? I hadn't considered it for my DC who is interested in smaller schools in the NE but maybe we should.
oh my kids LOVED Davidson when we visited. They didn't end up applying as they'd have to do ED to have a shot and choose another ED school. That said, my DD bought a Davidson sweatshirt when we visited and for the next year every time she wore it, someone stopped to talk to her about the school. I mean on the beach, on the airplane, at another college campus. She was actually going to write her essay for Davidson about "the sweatshirt" talking about all the people she met and how they were so passionate about their experiences with the school.
It is VERY tiny though.
+2 Rejected Harvard (gorgeous and generous, but too patronizing and immature), MIT, Hopkins (too pro-sexual assault), etc guys for UVa DH. No regrets. And I am the "fake" UVa poster/basher.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, having attended a school with a similar student body to Davidson, I wouldn’t say the “quality” of the opposite sex is better. They may be bright, but they also can be the typical rich a-hole with very high opinions of themselves.
Maybe the current bf is an athlete and got full ride or something?
It is unlikely they will stay together, but you never know.
Stop acting like the boys who get into top schools are so much better than others.
+1
Anonymous wrote:What's with all the posts about Davidson all of a sudden? I hadn't considered it for my DC who is interested in smaller schools in the NE but maybe we should.
Anonymous wrote:What's with all the posts about Davidson all of a sudden? I hadn't considered it for my DC who is interested in smaller schools in the NE but maybe we should.
Anonymous wrote:Again, having attended a school with a similar student body to Davidson, I wouldn’t say the “quality” of the opposite sex is better. They may be bright, but they also can be the typical rich a-hole with very high opinions of themselves.
Maybe the current bf is an athlete and got full ride or something?
It is unlikely they will stay together, but you never know.
Stop acting like the boys who get into top schools are so much better than others.
Anonymous wrote:Let her go to Davidson. It will take her less than a semester to figure out that the boys at Davidson are better than her UNCC old,news, loser boyfriend and have the time of her life.
Most high school relationships don't make it past thanksgiving.
Anonymous wrote:As parents, we just want her to make the decision for the right reasons.
Sorry to rain on the kumbaya, but Amherst and Davidson aren't in the same league. Amherst is generally regarded as one of the two best SLACs in the United States, interchangeably with Williams. To be accepted there is to gain a ticket to the best of American undergraduate education. Davidson is an excellent school but not that caliber, notwithstanding the usual regional chauvinism of DCUM commenters. The gap is even more pronounced in ranking systems like WSJ and Forbes which combine SLACs and universities, which put Amherst up in the top 20 and Davidson significantly lower ranked near #50 or #60. While it's silly to attach undue importance to a gap of few rankings in the USNWR survey, it's equally silly to pretend that rankings only reflect "prestige" rather than the quality of the educational experience, or that a material gap is meaningless.
Not sure what would be the "right reason" for your daughter to choose a lesser educational experience. A preference for warmer weather? Fear that she can't cut it at Amherst (although she wouldn't have been admitted if she weren't capable of the work)? A fascination with the Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia metro region? A curious nostalgia for the vestiges of Jim Crow? Support her inclinations if you want (although realistically there may be an equally high risk of her eventual resentment if she comes to believe you didn't provide the guidance she needed). But if she decides she "gets a better vibe" from Davidson or some equally silly non-reason (didn't like the tour guide at Amherst? really admired someone a year ahead of her in HS who went to Davidson?), I think as a parent you're obligated to at least make clear she's choosing (and you'll be paying for) the lesser education. Which for most people isn't what college is supposed to be about.
Anonymous wrote:As parents, we just want her to make the decision for the right reasons.
Sorry to rain on the kumbaya, but Amherst and Davidson aren't in the same league. Amherst is generally regarded as one of the two best SLACs in the United States, interchangeably with Williams. To be accepted there is to gain a ticket to the best of American undergraduate education. Davidson is an excellent school but not that caliber, notwithstanding the usual regional chauvinism of DCUM commenters. The gap is even more pronounced in ranking systems like WSJ and Forbes which combine SLACs and universities, which put Amherst up in the top 20 and Davidson significantly lower ranked near #50 or #60. While it's silly to attach undue importance to a gap of few rankings in the USNWR survey, it's equally silly to pretend that rankings only reflect "prestige" rather than the quality of the educational experience, or that a material gap is meaningless.
Not sure what would be the "right reason" for your daughter to choose a lesser educational experience. A preference for warmer weather? Fear that she can't cut it at Amherst (although she wouldn't have been admitted if she weren't capable of the work)? A fascination with the Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia metro region? A curious nostalgia for the vestiges of Jim Crow? Support her inclinations if you want (although realistically there may be an equally high risk of her eventual resentment if she comes to believe you didn't provide the guidance she needed). But if she decides she "gets a better vibe" from Davidson or some equally silly non-reason (didn't like the tour guide at Amherst? really admired someone a year ahead of her in HS who went to Davidson?), I think as a parent you're obligated to at least make clear she's choosing (and you'll be paying for) the lesser education. Which for most people isn't what college is supposed to be about.