Anonymous wrote:Only in the minds of people like OP.
I have been to private school, my kids have been in public schools, there are no cool/popular at that age. There are in middle and high schools, but again, it's only a subset of the student population that cares about this. Most students know that popularity isn't "important". Most students want to fit in with a group and have friends. Groups are porous and overlap. The weird notion that there are "nerds" and "jocks" only exists in movies. In real like, it's very fluid.
And God help any parent who cares about this! You don't need to be "popular" or "cool" to have friends.
Anonymous wrote:If you work in an elementary school, you know there definitely are "cool" kids.
I think it has to do with confidence, ease of communication, good clothes/hygiene, and general interests.
I say this as a parent of two kids who are both happy and have a lot friends, but aren't considered the "cool kids"--they are both brainy and not always confident![]()
Anonymous wrote:There was a book called Popular and it broke down likeability (good popular) and mean exclusive alphas (bad popular).
Good popular are the kids that get voted for class President because they’re accomplished and friendly. Bad popular are the mean girls or bullying jocks who engineer their status by putting down others.
Anonymous wrote:My DS is in 4th and there is definitely a cool group, particularly for girls. For the girls, it has nothing to do with their parents or social engineering. They're the girls who appear to be aware of their looks (not in a sexual or precocious way or anything but in more a groomed fashion way) sooner and have grasped group dynamic skills faster. I think it's mainly the group dynamics skills. I personally was late bloomer to those skills and it showed.
For the boys, it's mainly the sports bros. My own DS is not a sports bro but he's totally fine anyway.
While I am aware of this through his teacher and the school counselor (DS has ADHD and has contact with her), we're not at all concerned with it. It's all good.
Anonymous wrote:Fuggo? Is this a word the cool kids know?
Anonymous wrote:I have 2 kids, oldest is biological- cute but awkward, science geek. Definitely not cool. Younger sibling is adopted and was born cool, I swear. He’s always had off the charts high social IQ, we called him the “town mayor” in preschool bc he knew everyone by name, he’s athletic, funny, pays attention to what older kids wear and emulates, has good manners with adults so parents & teachers love him. A parent told me this year that her son said my son is “most popular” in his 5th grade class.
Anonymous wrote:Only in the minds of people like OP.
I have been to private school, my kids have been in public schools, there are no cool/popular at that age. There are in middle and high schools, but again, it's only a subset of the student population that cares about this. Most students know that popularity isn't "important". Most students want to fit in with a group and have friends. Groups are porous and overlap. The weird notion that there are "nerds" and "jocks" only exists in movies. In real like, it's very fluid.
And God help any parent who cares about this! You don't need to be "popular" or "cool" to have friends.
Anonymous wrote:Fuggo? Is this a word the cool kids know?[/quote
Yes it is a variation of fugly.