Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is one big projection by OP. Her only interest in her father is the size of her future inheritance, so she assumes everyone else views him the same way. It’s gross, OP.
Agree that OP is entirely preoccupied with her own inheritance, which she presumes is her sister’s angle because she visits her dad without OP’s explicit permission.
I don't think sister is visiting Dad. It's a beach house. Sister just goes with her husband, father isn't there. That was my understanding.
Anonymous wrote:This is wild. OP sounds paranoid and like he or she needs professional help. Just because the sister is involved in the beach house doesn’t mean she is trying to take control or future inheritance.
Also have no idea what OP’s beachhouse has to do with any of this. Except that it seems like OP is resentful that he or she bought their own beach house and the sister can just use dad’s
Seems to me that OP made a mistake buying a beach house, no? OP you should just sell yours and start visiting your dad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is one big projection by OP. Her only interest in her father is the size of her future inheritance, so she assumes everyone else views him the same way. It’s gross, OP.
Agree that OP is entirely preoccupied with her own inheritance, which she presumes is her sister’s angle because she visits her dad without OP’s explicit permission.
I don't think sister is visiting Dad. It's a beach house. Sister just goes with her husband, father isn't there. That was my understanding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What do you envision happening when your father dies? Are you going to try to share your dad's beach house with your siblings? Buy them out? Sell them your share?
OP, you haven't answered. It's not $333K of cash sitting in a bank account. It's a place that can't be split easily three ways. It's clear that you think your sister is trying to steal it, which would be awful. But what's your dream scenario?
Most normal people would have sister buy them out. If sister can't affird that then they can all sell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is one big projection by OP. Her only interest in her father is the size of her future inheritance, so she assumes everyone else views him the same way. It’s gross, OP.
Agree that OP is entirely preoccupied with her own inheritance, which she presumes is her sister’s angle because she visits her dad without OP’s explicit permission.
Anonymous wrote:This thread is one big projection by OP. Her only interest in her father is the size of her future inheritance, so she assumes everyone else views him the same way. It’s gross, OP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mentioning that her sister is less successful seems petty. It rubbed me the wrong way immediately.
You'd prefer OP to act as if the sister is wealthy, works full time, her BIL is a rich surgeon? The sister being long-term unemployed teases out work ethic and character issues, it explains her additional free time, it signals she can't afford a second home of her own, it tees up the dad possibly feeling sorry for her and her husband so they can weasel a larger than 33.3% cut of the dad's estate. It also creates a sense of entitlement in a mooch, when they see a sibling "with" and they are without, it rationalizes more ruthless mooching.
x100000000
THIS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mentioning that her sister is less successful seems petty. It rubbed me the wrong way immediately.
You'd prefer OP to act as if the sister is wealthy, works full time, her BIL is a rich surgeon? The sister being long-term unemployed teases out work ethic and character issues, it explains her additional free time, it signals she can't afford a second home of her own, it tees up the dad possibly feeling sorry for her and her husband so they can weasel a larger than 33.3% cut of the dad's estate. It also creates a sense of entitlement in a mooch, when they see a sibling "with" and they are without, it rationalizes more ruthless mooching.
Anonymous wrote:Mentioning that her sister is less successful seems petty. It rubbed me the wrong way immediately.
Anonymous wrote:You lost my sympathy at “less successful sister.”
Anonymous wrote:Mentioning that her sister is less successful seems petty. It rubbed me the wrong way immediately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've seen this before. What will happen is the sister will simply use the beach house as if it's her own, and will not agree to sell or to buy out her siblings. Be prepared, OP.
I am going through this EXACT situation. Its been 11 years and sister won't sell it and it's in Europe so legally things are different.
And my sister uses it and lets all her friends use it then in return they let her use their vacation homes.
Does the sister still pay her share of taxes and annual upkeep and maintenance?