Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parent choice idea will turn into kid choice. It’s not so great that the kids are now in charge of major health decisions.

I don’t want to be saddled with trying to make students wear masks based on parental wishes. Actually, the email that was sent out reads, “Respecting Student Choice and Need”: Teachers and school staff will not treat students differently based on their choice”. If a student shows up with a mask and the removes it later, it shouldn’t be an issue.

I am taking “mask police” off my job description as a teacher starting Monday. No more.

If we have to respect a child’s wishes on their gender preference we should respect their mask choice. This world is crazy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if the CDC says the masks aren't needed, will those who spent the whole week citing masks studies over and over, believe the CDC?? I mean they keep saying following the science and follow the CDC so will today at 3 PM they believe those studies don't matter? Or that the CDC is wrong and they did their research so they know better?

My senior plans to stay masked because she hasn’t had COVID and isolation is still ten days. Senior skip, APs, prom, graduation, robotics season, orchestra performances. She’s not concerned about COVID per se. But she’s very concerned about missing out on two weeks the last three month of senior years.

If they would do 5 days for isolation plus 5 masked, that might be different.

That's a good point. Isolation would be devastating for my kids' grades. They haven't had covid either. Hmmm....something to consider.

That email was so confusing but I think it is 5 days now if they will wear masks day 6-10.

Anonymous wrote:The FCPS website said they are aware of the new CDC guidance that came out Friday and will update us on Monday. Looks like a 100% turn a round from their January communication in response to the EO. LOL! FCPS looks absolutely idiotic!

No, actually you look like an idiot. They’ve always maintained that they were directed by a LAW to keep schools open and follow the CDC guidelines. The court upheld that. An executive order cannot trump a law. They’ve continued to follow the law (SB1303) directing them to follow CDC guidelines and were prepared to follow the NEW law that allowed parents to elect whether their child wears a mask effective March 1. The CDC guidelines changed YESTERDAY.

What exactly is funny here? There’s no “turnaround.” They’re simply following the law as it changes. The executive order was never a law. Sounds like you need to brush up on your reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, Champ.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if the CDC says the masks aren't needed, will those who spent the whole week citing masks studies over and over, believe the CDC?? I mean they keep saying following the science and follow the CDC so will today at 3 PM they believe those studies don't matter? Or that the CDC is wrong and they did their research so they know better?

My senior plans to stay masked because she hasn’t had COVID and isolation is still ten days. Senior skip, APs, prom, graduation, robotics season, orchestra performances. She’s not concerned about COVID per se. But she’s very concerned about missing out on two weeks the last three month of senior years.

If they would do 5 days for isolation plus 5 masked, that might be different.

That's a good point. Isolation would be devastating for my kids' grades. They haven't had covid either. Hmmm....something to consider.

Anonymous wrote:The FCPS website said they are aware of the new CDC guidance that came out Friday and will update us on Monday. Looks like a 100% turn a round from their January communication in response to the EO. LOL! FCPS looks absolutely idiotic!

Their response to the EO was that FCPS is obligated to comply with CDC guidelines.

Now, when CDC guidelines says kids do not need to mask as of Friday at 3:00, then FCPS can't find the time to read the new guidelines and apply them??

It's very disingenuous, and I was a Brabrand supporter right up until they created a new rule in early Feb saying we'd have to hold at the 7-day average of moderate for another 7 days (i.e. essentially 2 weeks) before making masks optional.

I'm not sure why they are unable to be "nimble" or who they are catering to. But, I do know that they are just making rules up to satisfy the group that has them by the balls. The whole "must follow CDC" schtick is a crock.

Anonymous wrote:So if the CDC says the masks aren't needed, will those who spent the whole week citing masks studies over and over, believe the CDC?? I mean they keep saying following the science and follow the CDC so will today at 3 PM they believe those studies don't matter? Or that the CDC is wrong and they did their research so they know better?

My senior plans to stay masked because she hasn’t had COVID and isolation is still ten days. Senior skip, APs, prom, graduation, robotics season, orchestra performances. She’s not concerned about COVID per se. But she’s very concerned about missing out on two weeks the last three month of senior years.

If they would do 5 days for isolation plus 5 masked, that might be different.

Anonymous wrote:The parent choice idea will turn into kid choice. It’s not so great that the kids are now in charge of major health decisions.

I don’t want to be saddled with trying to make students wear masks based on parental wishes. Actually, the email that was sent out reads, “Respecting Student Choice and Need”: Teachers and school staff will not treat students differently based on their choice”. If a student shows up with a mask and the removes it later, it shouldn’t be an issue.

The FCPS website said they are aware of the new CDC guidance that came out Friday and will update us on Monday. Looks like a 100% turn a round from their January communication in response to the EO. LOL! FCPS looks absolutely idiotic!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCPS's whole legal argument is that they are following CDC guidelines.

So, if they want to be consistent, they need to send out a notice saying no masks are needed inside by anyone starting today (not Tues), per CDC guidelines.

But, I don't know what they are saying in the ACLU lawsuit. That would be the only reason they stick to March 1st.

They always told us parents that they had to follow CDC guidelines...so let's see them do that. Or was that just cover for some other agenda?

Yes, no announcement needed. Based on FCPS plan earlier this week, now that we are in low transmission, all staff, students and visitors can attend Monday unmasked if they wish!

That is exactly my thinking as a teacher!!!

But FCPS wants the control and even said in their email that it doesn’t apply to teachers until we are directed by them. LOL

I’d like the option to unmask, but don’t they say we have to have at least 7 days straight in “Moderate” or lower? Now that’s no longer even a category. Technically we’ve been “Low” for a day and were “Substantial” the day before. I don’t think they’ll apply the new metrics to prior days.

Anonymous wrote:The parent choice idea will turn into kid choice. It’s not so great that the kids are now in charge of major health decisions.

Wearing a cloth mask is not a major health decision.

The parent choice idea will turn into kid choice. It’s not so great that the kids are now in charge of major health decisions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCPS's whole legal argument is that they are following CDC guidelines.

So, if they want to be consistent, they need to send out a notice saying no masks are needed inside by anyone starting today (not Tues), per CDC guidelines.

But, I don't know what they are saying in the ACLU lawsuit. That would be the only reason they stick to March 1st.

They always told us parents that they had to follow CDC guidelines...so let's see them do that. Or was that just cover for some other agenda?

Yes, no announcement needed. Based on FCPS plan earlier this week, now that we are in low transmission, all staff, students and visitors can attend Monday unmasked if they wish!

That is exactly my thinking as a teacher!!!

But FCPS wants the control and even said in their email that it doesn’t apply to teachers until we are directed by them. LOL

Anonymous wrote:FCPS's whole legal argument is that they are following CDC guidelines.

So, if they want to be consistent, they need to send out a notice saying no masks are needed inside by anyone starting today (not Tues), per CDC guidelines.

But, I don't know what they are saying in the ACLU lawsuit. That would be the only reason they stick to March 1st.

They always told us parents that they had to follow CDC guidelines...so let's see them do that. Or was that just cover for some other agenda?

Yes, no announcement needed. Based on FCPS plan earlier this week, now that we are in low transmission, all staff, students and visitors can attend Monday unmasked if they wish!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think this means that teachers and students do not have to wear their masks on Monday, 28 February.

I don’t think so, the school district still doesn’t allow it. They made it clear that even with March 1st they still prefer people wearing masks. Staff for sure. Unless they plan on sending another email, acknowledging CDC new guidelines, but I highly doubt that. FCPS is going to pretend it didn’t even happen. I planned on sending kids to school with masks on the 1st, since I didn’t want to be “that parent”. Not anymore, no masks on March 1st

I am a teacher and I doubt FCPS will give in easily on the teachers. They are so pissed that they can’t control kids and families so they will control us instead. 🙂

I will bet my Monday paycheck that you’re in that toxic FCPS teachers Facebook group.

Which one? The only I’m one in seems to want masks forever.

At happy hour after school there were about 25 of us who don't want that.

Teacher

Same, but the vocal social media group is very much pro mask. I just want kids to hear and understand what I say without going home with a sore throat daily.

Ok. It seems impossible to have an opposing opinion in that group. Hard to tell if that’s a true representation of the county.

Kinda like DCUM. If you only read here, you’d think that every parent in the county hates FCPS and thinks their child is being tortured by wearing a mask. You’d think that no one is learning a thing in a Title 1 school and that any classes outside of AAP only show cartoons all day.