Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a sophomore parent I was impressed by the initial presentation and follow-up materials shared by the Director of CCO. Disheartening to see some of the posts by senior parents. Surprised also by the early results reported here about the top 5-10% performing students w/o a hook.
And here, in a nutshell, is the problem.
PP, if you are a sophomore class parent, you need to read and understand this now. It should not come as a "surprise" that top-performing students at Sidwell are not getting into top schools ED unless they have a hook. That should not come as a surprise to anyone, because that is the reality now. If the school is at fault for anything, it is for not constantly articulating that but, as I'm afraid is displayed here, parents simply do not want to hear it.
This will be your child in 2 years. It will be extremely difficult to get into any top school in the country unless your child is a direct legacy or a coveted athlete. Please accept that now and plan accordingly.
I've been watching the admissions closely at two of the Big3 schools (that my kids attend) over the past 2 years and legacy is not enough. Kids need legacy plus something else. 1)URM, 2)very top student or top student plus super impressive extracurricular 3)VIP--i.e. the legacy parent is a nationally known politician or sports figure or doctor or judge or something. A household name.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a sophomore parent I was impressed by the initial presentation and follow-up materials shared by the Director of CCO. Disheartening to see some of the posts by senior parents. Surprised also by the early results reported here about the top 5-10% performing students w/o a hook.
And here, in a nutshell, is the problem.
PP, if you are a sophomore class parent, you need to read and understand this now. It should not come as a "surprise" that top-performing students at Sidwell are not getting into top schools ED unless they have a hook. That should not come as a surprise to anyone, because that is the reality now. If the school is at fault for anything, it is for not constantly articulating that but, as I'm afraid is displayed here, parents simply do not want to hear it.
This will be your child in 2 years. It will be extremely difficult to get into any top school in the country unless your child is a direct legacy or a coveted athlete. Please accept that now and plan accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a sophomore parent I was impressed by the initial presentation and follow-up materials shared by the Director of CCO. Disheartening to see some of the posts by senior parents. Surprised also by the early results reported here about the top 5-10% performing students w/o a hook.
And here, in a nutshell, is the problem.
PP, if you are a sophomore class parent, you need to read and understand this now. It should not come as a "surprise" that top-performing students at Sidwell are not getting into top schools ED unless they have a hook. That should not come as a surprise to anyone, because that is the reality now. If the school is at fault for anything, it is for not constantly articulating that but, as I'm afraid is displayed here, parents simply do not want to hear it.
This will be your child in 2 years. It will be extremely difficult to get into any top school in the country unless your child is a direct legacy or a coveted athlete. Please accept that now and plan accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a sophomore parent I was impressed by the initial presentation and follow-up materials shared by the Director of CCO. Disheartening to see some of the posts by senior parents. Surprised also by the early results reported here about the top 5-10% performing students w/o a hook.
And here, in a nutshell, is the problem.
PP, if you are a sophomore class parent, you need to read and understand this now. It should not come as a "surprise" that top-performing students at Sidwell are not getting into top schools ED unless they have a hook. That should not come as a surprise to anyone, because that is the reality now. If the school is at fault for anything, it is for not constantly articulating that but, as I'm afraid is displayed here, parents simply do not want to hear it.
This will be your child in 2 years. It will be extremely difficult to get into any top school in the country unless your child is a direct legacy or a coveted athlete. Please accept that now and plan accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, exactly. Waiting for the phone to ring. They are NOT calling AO's - no one does that any more.
But they said that this is actually a very busy time advocating for and supporting seniors within the CCO. Why would that be?
I thought some schools like Tulane still did
Who cares about #42 school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Meh...my 3.8 SFS senior didn't apply to any Ivies.
Following....we have a similar student who will most likely not apply to Ivies (or maybe just one for RD).
Was your DC successful in EA/ED? What types of schools did they apply to (as many non-Ivy/Stanford/MIT schools are also a crapshoot)
I cannot answer without outing my kid, but they generally wanted bigger schools with more opportunities, so no SLACs or Ivies. Focus was on national universities in vibrant areas.
Thanks. Were they successful in EA/ED?
Anonymous wrote:As a sophomore parent I was impressed by the initial presentation and follow-up materials shared by the Director of CCO. Disheartening to see some of the posts by senior parents. Surprised also by the early results reported here about the top 5-10% performing students w/o a hook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Meh...my 3.8 SFS senior didn't apply to any Ivies.
Following....we have a similar student who will most likely not apply to Ivies (or maybe just one for RD).
Was your DC successful in EA/ED? What types of schools did they apply to (as many non-Ivy/Stanford/MIT schools are also a crapshoot)
I cannot answer without outing my kid, but they generally wanted bigger schools with more opportunities, so no SLACs or Ivies. Focus was on national universities in vibrant areas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Meh...my 3.8 SFS senior didn't apply to any Ivies.
Following....we have a similar student who will most likely not apply to Ivies (or maybe just one for RD).
Was your DC successful in EA/ED? What types of schools did they apply to (as many non-Ivy/Stanford/MIT schools are also a crapshoot)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So sick of this fake fairness argument. On the one hand, SFS CCO strongly advises against getting a private Counsellor. On the other, they appear not to be providing the kind of services applicants need. Provide the high level of service to all that ask for it, problem solved. There, got that off my chest….
I completely agree. As the parent of a senior, we regretted not hiring one.
what kind of services do they provide that you regret not seeking out?
thx for any thoughts (current underclass parent here).