Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.
I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up
What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?
What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.
Something that an attorney can take to a court without facing sanctions. We've yet to see even that minuscule bar passed
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.
I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up
What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?
What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.
I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up
What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.
I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up
Evidence of Jewish Space Lasers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.
I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up
What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.
I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.
I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.
+1 Ladies and gentlemen, behold the member of House Homeland Security Committee who doesn’t think a plane hit the Pentagon.
![]()
She is a goddamn disgrace. I think maybe on one of the first meetings of the Homeland Security Committee, they should wait til she gets in, clear the room, lock the doors, then pull out all of the files and documents and photos and data, and spend the next 8 hours educating this complete moron on the TRUTH regarding all of the idiotic batshit conspiracy theories she spouts.
Sorry, the disgrace is any GOP politician (or supporter really) who doesn’t full throatedly rebuke the current GOP. There have always been crazies. It’s what those in power do with them.
Let’s see all the Jan 6th footage please
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.
I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.
I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.
+1 Ladies and gentlemen, behold the member of House Homeland Security Committee who doesn’t think a plane hit the Pentagon.
![]()
She is a goddamn disgrace. I think maybe on one of the first meetings of the Homeland Security Committee, they should wait til she gets in, clear the room, lock the doors, then pull out all of the files and documents and photos and data, and spend the next 8 hours educating this complete moron on the TRUTH regarding all of the idiotic batshit conspiracy theories she spouts.
Sorry, the disgrace is any GOP politician (or supporter really) who doesn’t full throatedly rebuke the current GOP. There have always been crazies. It’s what those in power do with them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?
Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."
https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266
Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?
I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.
This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.
+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.