Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm 54 and remember when everybody started marketing low fat foods in the 80s, and nobody realized they added a bunch of sugar to make it taste better. And I really think we got addicted to that, more than anything. And that was about the same time diet sodas became sweetened with Nutrasweet which tasted a lot better than the older saccharine sweeteners that had a bitter aftertaste. There is some data out there that just tasting the sweetness without getting the calories makes you crave more.
To me, those two trends really shifted how we ate as a country. That plus fast food marketing super-sized everything.
I really do think it's more than a few things. Probably a shift in the sugar content of all our food.
Anonymous wrote:No fast food and much better coke. And also people really cared and ate better. Today it feels trendy to be fat.
Anonymous wrote:Portion sizes were smaller -- particularly in restaurants. Even plates are larger now -- my parents still have the dinner plates we used in the 70s and they are smaller than the Pottery Barn ones I bought in the 2000s.
And smoking was definitely more prevalent -- my family didn't smoke but we had ashtrays my parents would put out for parties.
Anonymous wrote:No fast food and much better coke. And also people really cared and ate better. Today it feels trendy to be fat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm 54 and remember when everybody started marketing low fat foods in the 80s, and nobody realized they added a bunch of sugar to make it taste better. And I really think we got addicted to that, more than anything. And that was about the same time diet sodas became sweetened with Nutrasweet which tasted a lot better than the older saccharine sweeteners that had a bitter aftertaste. There is some data out there that just tasting the sweetness without getting the calories makes you crave more.
To me, those two trends really shifted how we ate as a country. That plus fast food marketing super-sized everything.
ding ding ding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of ideas out there but we actually don’t really know.
“ A given person, in 2006, eating the same amount of calories, taking in the same quantities of macronutrients like protein and fat, and exercising the same amount as a person of the same age did in 1988 would have a BMI that was about 2.3 points higher. In other words, people today are about 10 percent heavier than people were in the 1980s, even if they follow the exact same diet and exercise plans.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/09/why-it-was-easier-to-be-skinny-in-the-1980s/407974/
This. It could be the rise of obesogens - things like BPA and phthalates that are pervasive in the environment and in our bodies. You can thank the chemical lobby and money in politics for not protecting us from these poisons. U.S. women's breast milk contains more chemicals compared to European mothers. In Europe chemicals have to be proven safe instead of proven harmful like here. Some of these chemicals may cause epigenetic changes in metabolism across generations.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/may/13/pfas-forever-chemicals-breast-milk-us-study
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/09/magazine/toxic-breast-milk.html
When European scientists first saw the test results of American women, they thought there must be a mistake. Our levels were 10 to 100 times higher than those of women in Europe and Japan.
This
. I went on some supplements that blew me up like a marshmallow. Never got picked on or treated badly. However, my whole life vicious, sexually frustrated fat people have spread lies about me, bullied me, and abused me. Fat people just lie and even though they ARE VIVIDLY AWARE that after people get to know them they get dumped for their behavior. People just believe the lies if it comes from an obese person. Worst, most racist, most dishonest people ON THE INSIDE.Anonymous wrote:
THERE IS A WHOLE LOTTA SHAME IN BEING FAT! Why don’t you try being fat and see how what happens! Maybe social media has you thinking there’s no shame, but IRL, the shame is real!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of ideas out there but we actually don’t really know.
“ A given person, in 2006, eating the same amount of calories, taking in the same quantities of macronutrients like protein and fat, and exercising the same amount as a person of the same age did in 1988 would have a BMI that was about 2.3 points higher. In other words, people today are about 10 percent heavier than people were in the 1980s, even if they follow the exact same diet and exercise plans.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/09/why-it-was-easier-to-be-skinny-in-the-1980s/407974/
This. It could be the rise of obesogens - things like BPA and phthalates that are pervasive in the environment and in our bodies. You can thank the chemical lobby and money in politics for not protecting us from these poisons. U.S. women's breast milk contains more chemicals compared to European mothers. In Europe chemicals have to be proven safe instead of proven harmful like here. Some of these chemicals may cause epigenetic changes in metabolism across generations.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/may/13/pfas-forever-chemicals-breast-milk-us-study
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/09/magazine/toxic-breast-milk.html
When European scientists first saw the test results of American women, they thought there must be a mistake. Our levels were 10 to 100 times higher than those of women in Europe and Japan.
This
Anonymous wrote:I'm 54 and remember when everybody started marketing low fat foods in the 80s, and nobody realized they added a bunch of sugar to make it taste better. And I really think we got addicted to that, more than anything. And that was about the same time diet sodas became sweetened with Nutrasweet which tasted a lot better than the older saccharine sweeteners that had a bitter aftertaste. There is some data out there that just tasting the sweetness without getting the calories makes you crave more.
To me, those two trends really shifted how we ate as a country. That plus fast food marketing super-sized everything.
size 8-12 (for women)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's no shame in being fat now.
Back then, the fat kid got teased, picked last in PE and general games, and didn't usually make any little league teams.
Plus, no one dated the fat kid.
I'm not saying back then was better at all, but body positivity was not a thing. Mothers back then did not hesitate to tell their daughters not to eat certain things or they'd get fat.
I can remember my mom telling me to limit myself to one or two pieces of chocolate a month so I didn't get acne. Also, I was always served a smaller portion of food at dinner to maintain my figure. Boys needed food to grow and become strong. Women needed will power to be as strong as possible.
My cousin was chubby from birth and as soon as she hit 12 or 13, I remember my aunt having the doctor put her on some type of weight loss drug. That stuff had her looking like a skeleton in no time at all!
As someone married to an obese man, I think you should really check yourself when you say there's no stigma against being big. You may think there should be MORE social opprobrium against those who aren't skinny but I can tell you that from his perspective, there's plenty of nasty judgment still, don't you worry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of ideas out there but we actually don’t really know.
“ A given person, in 2006, eating the same amount of calories, taking in the same quantities of macronutrients like protein and fat, and exercising the same amount as a person of the same age did in 1988 would have a BMI that was about 2.3 points higher. In other words, people today are about 10 percent heavier than people were in the 1980s, even if they follow the exact same diet and exercise plans.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/09/why-it-was-easier-to-be-skinny-in-the-1980s/407974/
This. It could be the rise of obesogens - things like BPA and phthalates that are pervasive in the environment and in our bodies. You can thank the chemical lobby and money in politics for not protecting us from these poisons. U.S. women's breast milk contains more chemicals compared to European mothers. In Europe chemicals have to be proven safe instead of proven harmful like here. Some of these chemicals may cause epigenetic changes in metabolism across generations.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/may/13/pfas-forever-chemicals-breast-milk-us-study
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/09/magazine/toxic-breast-milk.html
When European scientists first saw the test results of American women, they thought there must be a mistake. Our levels were 10 to 100 times higher than those of women in Europe and Japan.