Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone hear back from their council members whether they support this bill? It's really scary.
It’s truly a terrifying bill. Teachers will get appropriate masks, awful! We will get timely updates and case notifications - a nightmare! DCPS will make sure buildings are staffed, even if it means people from central office will have to leave home and go to schools…oh the humanity!!!
If the metrics for closing see what scare you, let them know…bills can be amended. To call this bill, which would mandate basic safety and mitigation measures, isn’t “really scary”
What a relief! I was really worried, but after reading this explanation you’ve convinced me that the group that introduced CORE’s demands will totally compromise in good faith. Maybe they will adjust the metrics so that schools are only in virtual through May. Gosh I feel silly - just like I did when I was told that learning loss is fake news but we should also adjust expectations downward this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone hear back from their council members whether they support this bill? It's really scary.
It’s truly a terrifying bill. Teachers will get appropriate masks, awful! We will get timely updates and case notifications - a nightmare! DCPS will make sure buildings are staffed, even if it means people from central office will have to leave home and go to schools…oh the humanity!!!
If the metrics for closing see what scare you, let them know…bills can be amended. To call this bill, which would mandate basic safety and mitigation measures, isn’t “really scary”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not in DC but I follow this because I'm in an area like DC. Obviously the bill is an attempt to move to virtual for months; I can't believe this is even debated. The metrics force essentially permanent closures.
It's just so sad to me. If we had been rational about school closures before, we could broach the subject of a month-long shutdown to deal with staffing shortages and a lot of sick people in the community. Not to pretend to stop community spread (closing school won't do that, especially with everything else open). Not to pretend that virtual is education except for a small group of privileged kids. But just for practical reasons (staffing, etc.).
But the extended closures were so harmful and so unnecessary that people can't even have the conversation. And rationally so, nobody reasonable would believe this "only two weeks" nonsense. So here we are. It's sad.
+1
The games and pretend arguments have really gotten to me.
Also virtual isnt education for "privileged" kids either. They only didnt fall as far behind because their highly educated parents stepped into the breach to cover.
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone hear back from their council members whether they support this bill? It's really scary.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not in DC but I follow this because I'm in an area like DC. Obviously the bill is an attempt to move to virtual for months; I can't believe this is even debated. The metrics force essentially permanent closures.
It's just so sad to me. If we had been rational about school closures before, we could broach the subject of a month-long shutdown to deal with staffing shortages and a lot of sick people in the community. Not to pretend to stop community spread (closing school won't do that, especially with everything else open). Not to pretend that virtual is education except for a small group of privileged kids. But just for practical reasons (staffing, etc.).
But the extended closures were so harmful and so unnecessary that people can't even have the conversation. And rationally so, nobody reasonable would believe this "only two weeks" nonsense. So here we are. It's sad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When do we find out about where/when to submit testimony regarding this bill?
Contact your council person as well as the at-large council people. Email them directly. Tell them kids need to be in school.
Anonymous wrote:When do we find out about where/when to submit testimony regarding this bill?
Anonymous wrote:I'm not in DC but I follow this because I'm in an area like DC. Obviously the bill is an attempt to move to virtual for months; I can't believe this is even debated. The metrics force essentially permanent closures.
It's just so sad to me. If we had been rational about school closures before, we could broach the subject of a month-long shutdown to deal with staffing shortages and a lot of sick people in the community. Not to pretend to stop community spread (closing school won't do that, especially with everything else open). Not to pretend that virtual is education except for a small group of privileged kids. But just for practical reasons (staffing, etc.).
But the extended closures were so harmful and so unnecessary that people can't even have the conversation. And rationally so, nobody reasonable would believe this "only two weeks" nonsense. So here we are. It's sad.