Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting how people just blindly accept these mandates without conducting an even cursory search of the facts, both for and against mask wearing. Data out of Sweden where no masks are required for students shows they don’t make a difference. And the US is one of only seven countries that require students to mask up and I think we can all agree that the US hasn’t exactly been a leader in fighting Covid.
OP here. What can we do about it? We need to follow the rules no matter how stupid they are. I wrote to the nurses and they believe the masks won’t be worse for my kids than the cloth ones they have always been wearing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am speechless and upset.
Are all other schools do the same?
Do you think 2 3-layers masks are easier for little kids than KN95 masks?
Science says the cloth masks are not as effective for Omicron. The kids really don't care, they adapt. Would you rather have a sick kid?
Honestly? If my kid got omicron and basically had a cold for a few days, then yes, I would rather that happen than the entire school forced to be gagged indefinitely.
Happy now?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am speechless and upset.
Are all other schools do the same?
Do you think 2 3-layers masks are easier for little kids than KN95 masks?
Science says the cloth masks are not as effective for Omicron. The kids really don't care, they adapt. Would you rather have a sick kid?
Anonymous wrote:Interesting how people just blindly accept these mandates without conducting an even cursory search of the facts, both for and against mask wearing. Data out of Sweden where no masks are required for students shows they don’t make a difference. And the US is one of only seven countries that require students to mask up and I think we can all agree that the US hasn’t exactly been a leader in fighting Covid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where’s the science on this? Every study shows Covid causes virtually no harm in young children and transmission rates are very low whilst wearing masks could have long term psychological consequences.
I don’t get any of the comments. Everyone’s required to wear masks indoors. That isn’t bvr’s rule; that’s the mandate. Kn95s and similar are more comfortable than regular masks, and they’re more effective.
Most of these comments are anti-mask and pro-letting kids get COVID on the assumption that no kid will be the unlucky one who needs a hospital bed but can’t get one because the hospitals are full of unvaccinated idiots who won’t do their basic duty as citizens. That’s not a totally indefensible position, but…that is literally not a choice that is on the table.
Ten pages arguing on a private school forum about an issue that is really about a mask mandate….smh.
OP here. I was fine with my kids wearing cloth masks (not thrilled, but accepting of the rules). My kids have never worn a KN95 mask, but I have and I can’t breath with it. I can’t imagine my kids being able to run, play, etc while wearing one of those. On top of that, my kids (and all of their classmates) are fully vaccinated since a few weeks ago.
My children and I will accept the rule of course, but I am really mad about it and I am starting to see that “the other side” has several valid points.
I also have a 2 year old that has to wear a mask. I think this is ridiculous too because he chews on it and it’s always drenched when I pick him up…. But that’s another story.
I wish there was a middle ground where kids had to get tested (maybe even twice a week) and do not need to wear these awful masks that I personally can’t stand for more than a few minutes and did not have to breath all of their carbon dioxide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where’s the science on this? Every study shows Covid causes virtually no harm in young children and transmission rates are very low whilst wearing masks could have long term psychological consequences.
I don’t get any of the comments. Everyone’s required to wear masks indoors. That isn’t bvr’s rule; that’s the mandate. Kn95s and similar are more comfortable than regular masks, and they’re more effective.
Most of these comments are anti-mask and pro-letting kids get COVID on the assumption that no kid will be the unlucky one who needs a hospital bed but can’t get one because the hospitals are full of unvaccinated idiots who won’t do their basic duty as citizens. That’s not a totally indefensible position, but…that is literally not a choice that is on the table.
Ten pages arguing on a private school forum about an issue that is really about a mask mandate….smh.
OP here. I was fine with my kids wearing cloth masks (not thrilled, but accepting of the rules). My kids have never worn a KN95 mask, but I have and I can’t breath with it. I can’t imagine my kids being able to run, play, etc while wearing one of those. On top of that, my kids (and all of their classmates) are fully vaccinated since a few weeks ago.
My children and I will accept the rule of course, but I am really mad about it and I am starting to see that “the other side” has several valid points.
I also have a 2 year old that has to wear a mask. I think this is ridiculous too because he chews on it and it’s always drenched when I pick him up…. But that’s another story.
I wish there was a middle ground where kids had to get tested (maybe even twice a week) and do not need to wear these awful masks that I personally can’t stand for more than a few minutes and did not have to breath all of their carbon dioxide.
Anonymous wrote:Interesting how people just blindly accept these mandates without conducting an even cursory search of the facts, both for and against mask wearing. Data out of Sweden where no masks are required for students shows they don’t make a difference. And the US is one of only seven countries that require students to mask up and I think we can all agree that the US hasn’t exactly been a leader in fighting Covid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where’s the science on this? Every study shows Covid causes virtually no harm in young children and transmission rates are very low whilst wearing masks could have long term psychological consequences.
I don’t get any of the comments. Everyone’s required to wear masks indoors. That isn’t bvr’s rule; that’s the mandate. Kn95s and similar are more comfortable than regular masks, and they’re more effective.
Most of these comments are anti-mask and pro-letting kids get COVID on the assumption that no kid will be the unlucky one who needs a hospital bed but can’t get one because the hospitals are full of unvaccinated idiots who won’t do their basic duty as citizens. That’s not a totally indefensible position, but…that is literally not a choice that is on the table.
Ten pages arguing on a private school forum about an issue that is really about a mask mandate….smh.
OP here. I was fine with my kids wearing cloth masks (not thrilled, but accepting of the rules). My kids have never worn a KN95 mask, but I have and I can’t breath with it. I can’t imagine my kids being able to run, play, etc while wearing one of those. On top of that, my kids (and all of their classmates) are fully vaccinated since a few weeks ago.
My children and I will accept the rule of course, but I am really mad about it and I am starting to see that “the other side” has several valid points.
I also have a 2 year old that has to wear a mask. I think this is ridiculous too because he chews on it and it’s always drenched when I pick him up…. But that’s another story.
I wish there was a middle ground where kids had to get tested (maybe even twice a week) and do not need to wear these awful masks that I personally can’t stand for more than a few minutes and did not have to breath all of their carbon dioxide.
Anonymous wrote:Where’s the science on this? Every study shows Covid causes virtually no harm in young children and transmission rates are very low whilst wearing masks could have long term psychological consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where’s the science on this? Every study shows Covid causes virtually no harm in young children and transmission rates are very low whilst wearing masks could have long term psychological consequences.
I don’t get any of the comments. Everyone’s required to wear masks indoors. That isn’t bvr’s rule; that’s the mandate. Kn95s and similar are more comfortable than regular masks, and they’re more effective.
Most of these comments are anti-mask and pro-letting kids get COVID on the assumption that no kid will be the unlucky one who needs a hospital bed but can’t get one because the hospitals are full of unvaccinated idiots who won’t do their basic duty as citizens. That’s not a totally indefensible position, but…that is literally not a choice that is on the table.
Ten pages arguing on a private school forum about an issue that is really about a mask mandate….smh.
Anonymous wrote:Where’s the science on this? Every study shows Covid causes virtually no harm in young children and transmission rates are very low whilst wearing masks could have long term psychological consequences.