Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this would be a helpful thread with tips.
Looking for tips to promote optimal speech development? How old is your child?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity, for those of you who assert that masks should be optional, do you feel the same way about peanut butter?
Should I be able to send my kid, who is a super picky eater and eats mostly PBJ right now, to school with a peanut butter sandwich instead of the contortions I go through to try and find stuff he can eat that doesn't include nuts, which right now, is only apples and Pirate's Booty?
It's clearly to my child's benefit to be able to eat peanut butter in school. Why should I give a crap about the kid who is allergic?
Really poor analogy. Let me fix it for you: your child is falling behind because he can’t eat peanut butter in daycare because there is a slim chance the other kid might be allergic and have a minor reaction. So your kid is suffering for what is a slight risk of a minor reaction.
Besides, that’s not what I’m advocating. I want the adult teachers masks off in the infant and toddler rooms and replaced by a daily nose-swab covid test for the caregivers.
Anonymous wrote:I thought this would be a helpful thread with tips.
Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity, for those of you who assert that masks should be optional, do you feel the same way about peanut butter?
Should I be able to send my kid, who is a super picky eater and eats mostly PBJ right now, to school with a peanut butter sandwich instead of the contortions I go through to try and find stuff he can eat that doesn't include nuts, which right now, is only apples and Pirate's Booty?
It's clearly to my child's benefit to be able to eat peanut butter in school. Why should I give a crap about the kid who is allergic?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity, for those of you who assert that masks should be optional, do you feel the same way about peanut butter?
Should I be able to send my kid, who is a super picky eater and eats mostly PBJ right now, to school with a peanut butter sandwich instead of the contortions I go through to try and find stuff he can eat that doesn't include nuts, which right now, is only apples and Pirate's Booty?
It's clearly to my child's benefit to be able to eat peanut butter in school. Why should I give a crap about the kid who is allergic?
Yes, we all know peanuts can be deadly to kids that are allergic.
We have no evidence that not requiring a young child to wear a cloth mask for the other half of the day when they aren't eating or sleeping has any benefit, at all.
But if it makes you feel better to participate in this theater, nobody is forcing you to sign the petition.
Masks aren't theater. And, you are entirely missing the point. You basically don't care about anyone, including your own kids. Most kids are fine with masks.
Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity, for those of you who assert that masks should be optional, do you feel the same way about peanut butter?
Should I be able to send my kid, who is a super picky eater and eats mostly PBJ right now, to school with a peanut butter sandwich instead of the contortions I go through to try and find stuff he can eat that doesn't include nuts, which right now, is only apples and Pirate's Booty?
It's clearly to my child's benefit to be able to eat peanut butter in school. Why should I give a crap about the kid who is allergic?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity, for those of you who assert that masks should be optional, do you feel the same way about peanut butter?
Should I be able to send my kid, who is a super picky eater and eats mostly PBJ right now, to school with a peanut butter sandwich instead of the contortions I go through to try and find stuff he can eat that doesn't include nuts, which right now, is only apples and Pirate's Booty?
It's clearly to my child's benefit to be able to eat peanut butter in school. Why should I give a crap about the kid who is allergic?
Yes, we all know peanuts can be deadly to kids that are allergic.
We have no evidence that not requiring a young child to wear a cloth mask for the other half of the day when they aren't eating or sleeping has any benefit, at all.
But if it makes you feel better to participate in this theater, nobody is forcing you to sign the petition.
Anonymous wrote:Out of curiosity, for those of you who assert that masks should be optional, do you feel the same way about peanut butter?
Should I be able to send my kid, who is a super picky eater and eats mostly PBJ right now, to school with a peanut butter sandwich instead of the contortions I go through to try and find stuff he can eat that doesn't include nuts, which right now, is only apples and Pirate's Booty?
It's clearly to my child's benefit to be able to eat peanut butter in school. Why should I give a crap about the kid who is allergic?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s what the AAP says about masks and speech: https://www.healthychildren.org/English/health-issues/conditions/COVID-19/Pages/Do-face-masks-interfere-with-language-development.aspx
Our toddler and preschooler have both learned two languages over the past two years, and because we are at high risk, we live like we’re in a monastery except for preschool, which is fully masked.
One of the challenges of this kind of discussion is that it’s really, really hard to control for confounding variables in human subject research and we tend to see our own experiences (and ignore anything that doesn’t conform to it). You have to be exceptionally well trained to avoid these obstacles when evaluating the effects of various policies and interventions.
If masks are contributing to speech delays, good evidence to that effect is not yet available. OTOH, we have very clear evidence that Covid can be quite dangerous. And masks and distancing are among our limited tools for dealing with it. Sometimes you have to make the best of a bad situation.
It's a little disturbing that the AAP cites visually impaired children as proof that masks can't possibly impact development, when large percentages of blind children have developmental disabilities. They are making claims they can't possibly have the information to make.
+1. And you can’t make the comparison between a child who sees nothing and I child you sometimes sees words mouthed and other times not. Plus blind kids touch faces and mouths which our kids can’t. AND blind children do have delayed speech in my experience.
What are you even advocating for, though? There is no reasonable way to request/require "no masks for caregivers" for licensed daycare centers. Not going to happen, they will always be allowed. The requirements for them probably will eventually drop, but who knows when. It won't be driven by parents, but by health.
Are you advocating everyone should use a nanny or stay home with their little ones?
Are you just trying to stir up fear in parents, or manufacture a controversy?
NP here. I truly loathe comments like yours. Let information (even anecdotal information) be shared without accusing those sharing of Mommy-shaming or fear-mongering or manufacturing controversy or daycare slamming!!! Jesus, stop demanding censorship to protect your ego. We each can read and make our own decisions on what, if anything, need be done with the information.
Let people talk!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s what the AAP says about masks and speech: https://www.healthychildren.org/English/health-issues/conditions/COVID-19/Pages/Do-face-masks-interfere-with-language-development.aspx
Our toddler and preschooler have both learned two languages over the past two years, and because we are at high risk, we live like we’re in a monastery except for preschool, which is fully masked.
One of the challenges of this kind of discussion is that it’s really, really hard to control for confounding variables in human subject research and we tend to see our own experiences (and ignore anything that doesn’t conform to it). You have to be exceptionally well trained to avoid these obstacles when evaluating the effects of various policies and interventions.
If masks are contributing to speech delays, good evidence to that effect is not yet available. OTOH, we have very clear evidence that Covid can be quite dangerous. And masks and distancing are among our limited tools for dealing with it. Sometimes you have to make the best of a bad situation.
It's a little disturbing that the AAP cites visually impaired children as proof that masks can't possibly impact development, when large percentages of blind children have developmental disabilities. They are making claims they can't possibly have the information to make.
+1. And you can’t make the comparison between a child who sees nothing and I child you sometimes sees words mouthed and other times not. Plus blind kids touch faces and mouths which our kids can’t. AND blind children do have delayed speech in my experience.
What are you even advocating for, though? There is no reasonable way to request/require "no masks for caregivers" for licensed daycare centers. Not going to happen, they will always be allowed. The requirements for them probably will eventually drop, but who knows when. It won't be driven by parents, but by health.
Are you advocating everyone should use a nanny or stay home with their little ones?
Are you just trying to stir up fear in parents, or manufacture a controversy?