Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This reminded me of When Mars Attacks. A lot of great actors, but a really crappy movie. Same here.
Meryl Streep is similar to the character she played and was fitting she got eaten first, lol. Still overall I'd give it 2 stars like the other reviewers.
Yes! Reminds me of Mars Attacks, including all the people insisting it was a good movie, largely because of the cast.
I still hold a grudge about spending money on movie theater tickets for that one.
Yep. Now everyone admits it sucked, lol. Also, like Black Panther which certainly wasn't this bad, but it was very mediocre. I was looking forward to that as well and it was very slow among other things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I found it hilarious. The bits about "2-side-ism", celebrity worship, and the political manipulation of the ignorant - were absurd but funny.
+1
So funny. “I don’t want to get political [about science].”
I’m guessing that the MAGAs won’t like the movie much.![]()
I was wondering why the Rotten Tomato viewer ratings weren’t higher, and DH thought it was because of Trumpers not liking it.
You are nuts to bring Trump into a movie, deranged much..
It got low ratings because it was basically pretty bad. I thought the beginning was interesting until it spiraled out of control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This reminded me of When Mars Attacks. A lot of great actors, but a really crappy movie. Same here.
Meryl Streep is similar to the character she played and was fitting she got eaten first, lol. Still overall I'd give it 2 stars like the other reviewers.
Yes! Reminds me of Mars Attacks, including all the people insisting it was a good movie, largely because of the cast.
I still hold a grudge about spending money on movie theater tickets for that one.
Anonymous wrote:This reminded me of When Mars Attacks. A lot of great actors, but a really crappy movie. Same here.
Meryl Streep is similar to the character she played and was fitting she got eaten first, lol. Still overall I'd give it 2 stars like the other reviewers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, you really hung in there, champ.Anonymous wrote:My wife and I also tried to watch it but we found it so boring in the first 10 minutes we switched it off.
I feel like this is kind of the start of the next movie that needs to be made. The political idiots and business sharks only get in these positions of power because we have voting citizens who can't defer gratification long enough to make it through more than the first ten minutes of a middle-brow movie.
We have created a country where many think mainly with "gut" and can't handle focusing on anything that doesn't give them an instant dopamine hit with limited intellectual investment. End stage capitalism - a life so easy and comfortable that a movie that doesn't grab attention immediately in first ten minutes is doomed with a subsection of society.
Or maybe it was just boring?
Is science boring too?
I was dying laughing when they told Leo “no math” when he was going on TV. DH is a physicist and he said at the same time as Leo, “It’s all math!”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I found it hilarious. The bits about "2-side-ism", celebrity worship, and the political manipulation of the ignorant - were absurd but funny.
+1
So funny. “I don’t want to get political [about science].”
I’m guessing that the MAGAs won’t like the movie much.![]()
I was wondering why the Rotten Tomato viewer ratings weren’t higher, and DH thought it was because of Trumpers not liking it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Liberals are pathetic . This is humor for them
Says someone who thinks “let’s go Brandon” is hysterical
Anonymous wrote:This era's Idiocracy. Brilliant, right down to the weirdo Elon Musk/Bezos/Jack Dorsey type.
I was kind of wondering what Timothee Chalamet was doing in it until the table scene, and wow.
Meryl Streep continues to amaze as does Cate Blanchett. But the entire cast was great.
Anonymous wrote:It was meh. Idiocracy was much better and this was trying way too hard. They must not think much of their audience because they sure felt they needed to hammer the same points home over and over.
PS the one part that I actually thought was funny was JL's obsession with the snacks.Anonymous wrote:It was meh. Idiocracy was much better and this was trying way too hard. They must not think much of their audience because they sure felt they needed to hammer the same points home over and over.