Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion. Many of the know it alls on this forum don’t actually know anything. It’s like a Holiday Express convention.
Anyhow here’s my actually unpopular opinion: athleticism does matter in soccer because … wait for it … it’s a sport. Juggle and perfect your first touch and soccer IQ all you’d like but that will not get you above a certain level. The Euros know this. The South Americans know this. All the big time American sports coaches and players know this. Somehow many on this forum don’t know this (or maybe deep down they do but won’t admit it).
Speed does matter, but turn the ball over every time you touch it and see how much playing time you get.
Anonymous wrote:Parents that have never touched a ball or played a game in their life, believing they have a clue about this game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion. Shin guards are required in games so they should be required in practice. You play like you practice.
Yes! My damn teen boys don’t wear them at practice, nor do any of their teammates. High level too. Drives me insane.
Shin guards are as helpful as the parent that never played the game... zero
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion. Shin guards are required in games so they should be required in practice. You play like you practice.
Yes! My damn teen boys don’t wear them at practice, nor do any of their teammates. High level too. Drives me insane.
Anonymous wrote:Unpopular opinion. Shin guards are required in games so they should be required in practice. You play like you practice.
Anonymous wrote:Way to much stupid expensive travel. Although that is a popular, not an unpopular opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For ages 8, 9 and 10, I think the fields are too large and too few kids get touches on the ball.
Small-sided games (5v5) on smaller fields would, IMO, lead to better skill development and would facilitate more touches on the ball. And those touches would be more evenly distributed across all players.
Under the existing format, a few tall, long-legged players tend to dominate, but this domination is mainly because of their size (they can't outrun the smaller kids) as opposed to their soccer skills. This is an inefficient and wasteful approach to teaching the game.
As a corollary, by U12 the field feels way too small and cramped, my unpopular opinion would be to dump 9v9 entirely and stick to 7v7 up to the 11v11 cutover
Anonymous wrote:For ages 8, 9 and 10, I think the fields are too large and too few kids get touches on the ball.
Small-sided games (5v5) on smaller fields would, IMO, lead to better skill development and would facilitate more touches on the ball. And those touches would be more evenly distributed across all players.
Under the existing format, a few tall, long-legged players tend to dominate, but this domination is mainly because of their size (they can't outrun the smaller kids) as opposed to their soccer skills. This is an inefficient and wasteful approach to teaching the game.
Anonymous wrote:Watch a lot of ECNL girls soccer. The soccer is just not good and it is hard to watch. The speed of play is so slow it encourages physical play over everything else. The coaches push a very dump down soccer ans tell the parents it’s elite.
Anonymous wrote:Parents that have never touched a ball or played a game in their life, believing they have a clue about this game.
Anonymous wrote:Parents that have never touched a ball or played a game in their life, believing they have a clue about this game.