Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 17:08     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:From THR
Jennifer Aniston “You have no clue what’s going with me personally, medically, why I can’t … can I have kids?” They don’t know anything, and it was really hurtful and just nasty.

I remember hearing you talk with Gloria Steinem about how it can feel like your value as a woman is tied to your marital status and whether or not you’ve procreated, to which Gloria said …

She said, “I guess we’re in deep shit.” (Laughs.) It’s the same with Dolly Parton; Dolly Parton never had kids. But are people giving her shit for it? No, no one’s tried to put her in a white picket fence.”

*****
Jen is still talking about kids! And states no one criticizes Dolly Parton for not having kids. Perhaps that’s because Dolly has never said she wanted kids or dreams her future on a beach with kids.

If she didn’t want the speculation then she should have stated long ago she can’t have kids. And with her money she could have had a surrogate have her kids. Or just state she never really wanted kids. She just needs to stop talking about it.


This may be her hinting that she’s going to have a child. In Hollywood, planting a seed is very common. Naomi Campbell recently had her first child at 55. Brigitte Nielsen also had a child at 55. Janet Jackson I had a child at 50. Cameron Diaz had a child in her late 40s. I would not be surprised if Jennifer Anderson has a child via IVF and or surrogacy.


No, she said the ship has sailed. Did you not read?
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 17:02     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it makes perfect sense she didn't want to disclose such a personal issue while it was ongoing. Now it's done, she's accepted it and can settle the horribly mean and invasive speculation once and for all.


I also think it’s credible she’s trying to help women still going through that. Both to let people know that their speculation is hurtful and also to show those women that there is life after fertility failure. When she was actually in it, she wasn’t commenting on it. It was the magazines commenting on every bloated belly she had. Which, if she was going through fertility treatments, yeah, she’s going to put on some belly weight.


Except she was commenting on it. She discussed it in a very strategic way to leave you curious and guessing. She brought it up, but was careful never to discuss it with sufficient details.

Who does that if the speculation bothers you? You only do it if you want to keep fans wondering and wanting more.




To protect the privacy of her partner(s), obviously.




There is one hater, repeating the same thing over and over. Just ignore.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 16:56     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it makes perfect sense she didn't want to disclose such a personal issue while it was ongoing. Now it's done, she's accepted it and can settle the horribly mean and invasive speculation once and for all.


I also think it’s credible she’s trying to help women still going through that. Both to let people know that their speculation is hurtful and also to show those women that there is life after fertility failure. When she was actually in it, she wasn’t commenting on it. It was the magazines commenting on every bloated belly she had. Which, if she was going through fertility treatments, yeah, she’s going to put on some belly weight.


Except she was commenting on it. She discussed it in a very strategic way to leave you curious and guessing. She brought it up, but was careful never to discuss it with sufficient details.

Who does that if the speculation bothers you? You only do it if you want to keep fans wondering and wanting more.




To protect the privacy of her partner(s), obviously.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 16:23     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it makes perfect sense she didn't want to disclose such a personal issue while it was ongoing. Now it's done, she's accepted it and can settle the horribly mean and invasive speculation once and for all.


I also think it’s credible she’s trying to help women still going through that. Both to let people know that their speculation is hurtful and also to show those women that there is life after fertility failure. When she was actually in it, she wasn’t commenting on it. It was the magazines commenting on every bloated belly she had. Which, if she was going through fertility treatments, yeah, she’s going to put on some belly weight.


Except she was commenting on it. She discussed it in a very strategic way to leave you curious and guessing. She brought it up, but was careful never to discuss it with sufficient details.

Who does that if the speculation bothers you? You only do it if you want to keep fans wondering and wanting more.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 13:27     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:From THR
Jennifer Aniston “You have no clue what’s going with me personally, medically, why I can’t … can I have kids?” They don’t know anything, and it was really hurtful and just nasty.

I remember hearing you talk with Gloria Steinem about how it can feel like your value as a woman is tied to your marital status and whether or not you’ve procreated, to which Gloria said …

She said, “I guess we’re in deep shit.” (Laughs.) It’s the same with Dolly Parton; Dolly Parton never had kids. But are people giving her shit for it? No, no one’s tried to put her in a white picket fence.”

*****
Jen is still talking about kids! And states no one criticizes Dolly Parton for not having kids. Perhaps that’s because Dolly has never said she wanted kids or dreams her future on a beach with kids.

If she didn’t want the speculation then she should have stated long ago she can’t have kids. And with her money she could have had a surrogate have her kids. Or just state she never really wanted kids. She just needs to stop talking about it.


This may be her hinting that she’s going to have a child. In Hollywood, planting a seed is very common. Naomi Campbell recently had her first child at 55. Brigitte Nielsen also had a child at 55. Janet Jackson I had a child at 50. Cameron Diaz had a child in her late 40s. I would not be surprised if Jennifer Anderson has a child via IVF and or surrogacy.


Naomi was 51 but nevertheless I agree with your points.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10511855/She-wasnt-adopted-shes-child-Naomi-Campbell-51-reveals-daughters-face.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10511855/She-wasnt-adopted-shes-child-Naomi-Campbell-51-reveals-daughters-face.html


When someone else carries the baby, you don't HAVE a child. You GET a child.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 13:26     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:I think it makes perfect sense she didn't want to disclose such a personal issue while it was ongoing. Now it's done, she's accepted it and can settle the horribly mean and invasive speculation once and for all.


I also think it’s credible she’s trying to help women still going through that. Both to let people know that their speculation is hurtful and also to show those women that there is life after fertility failure. When she was actually in it, she wasn’t commenting on it. It was the magazines commenting on every bloated belly she had. Which, if she was going through fertility treatments, yeah, she’s going to put on some belly weight.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 13:21     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
I think it makes perfect sense she didn't want to disclose such a personal issue while it was ongoing. Now it's done, she's accepted it and can settle the horribly mean and invasive speculation once and for all.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 13:20     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
There was a blind when she was with Justin, before they married I think, saying she had a miscarriage after IVF, was in a dark place, and he hadn't seen her like that before.

I don't think she's lying.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 11:07     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Re: preapproved questions - someone died at her vacation home in Mexico surrounded by her celebrity guests. She’s never been asked about it in an interview.

When she talks about Brad or Justin, it’s on her terms. Nobody is asking her a question that might upset her.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 11:05     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand society‘s obsession with her and her uterus. She wants kids? Cool! She doesn’t want kids? Cool! Who cares why she doesn’t wanna have kids maybe she hates them or maybe she wanted to preserve her body.

I don’t know if it’s her PR team or society who keeps bringing this up but it’s boring news.


It’s her.

If she didn’t want to answer questions about babies, then her handlers would make clear it’s off limits. Period.

Her PR team decided a million years ago to use her pregnancy status as a hook to put her on magazines. Once she got older, they hook shifted to fertility issues.

This single issue kept her relevant as well as garnered sympathy. Had she simply said that she never wants kids, then she would have risked being labeled selfish.




Okay, you've posted this repeatedly. Most of don't agree with you. You can run along now.


Pretty sure this thread is about Aniston and babies. Read the title.

Do you really believe an A list celeb with as much power as Aniston is ever asked a question not preapproved by their team? If you believe that Aniston is ever thrown a curveball gotcha question, then I’m not sure you are equipped to weigh in.

Her highly curated girl next store sexy body perfect hair persona was designed to market her to magazines and gossip sites. Those numbers drive a Q score that determines marketability for tv and films as well as commercial goods. She couldn’t sell bottled water, hair and skin products if she comes across as a self-centered, indulged diva. The baby/fertility hook designed by her pr machine was brilliantly effective for decades. Decades.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 10:45     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand society‘s obsession with her and her uterus. She wants kids? Cool! She doesn’t want kids? Cool! Who cares why she doesn’t wanna have kids maybe she hates them or maybe she wanted to preserve her body.

I don’t know if it’s her PR team or society who keeps bringing this up but it’s boring news.


It’s her.

If she didn’t want to answer questions about babies, then her handlers would make clear it’s off limits. Period.

Her PR team decided a million years ago to use her pregnancy status as a hook to put her on magazines. Once she got older, they hook shifted to fertility issues.

This single issue kept her relevant as well as garnered sympathy. Had she simply said that she never wants kids, then she would have risked being labeled selfish.




Okay, you've posted this repeatedly. Most of don't agree with you. You can run along now.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 09:39     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand society‘s obsession with her and her uterus. She wants kids? Cool! She doesn’t want kids? Cool! Who cares why she doesn’t wanna have kids maybe she hates them or maybe she wanted to preserve her body.

I don’t know if it’s her PR team or society who keeps bringing this up but it’s boring news.


It’s her.

If she didn’t want to answer questions about babies, then her handlers would make clear it’s off limits. Period.

Her PR team decided a million years ago to use her pregnancy status as a hook to put her on magazines. Once she got older, they hook shifted to fertility issues.

This single issue kept her relevant as well as garnered sympathy. Had she simply said that she never wants kids, then she would have risked being labeled selfish.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 09:27     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:From THR
Jennifer Aniston “You have no clue what’s going with me personally, medically, why I can’t … can I have kids?” They don’t know anything, and it was really hurtful and just nasty.

I remember hearing you talk with Gloria Steinem about how it can feel like your value as a woman is tied to your marital status and whether or not you’ve procreated, to which Gloria said …

She said, “I guess we’re in deep shit.” (Laughs.) It’s the same with Dolly Parton; Dolly Parton never had kids. But are people giving her shit for it? No, no one’s tried to put her in a white picket fence.”

*****
Jen is still talking about kids! And states no one criticizes Dolly Parton for not having kids. Perhaps that’s because Dolly has never said she wanted kids or dreams her future on a beach with kids.

If she didn’t want the speculation then she should have stated long ago she can’t have kids. And with her money she could have had a surrogate have her kids. Or just state she never really wanted kids. She just needs to stop talking about it.


This may be her hinting that she’s going to have a child. In Hollywood, planting a seed is very common. Naomi Campbell recently had her first child at 55. Brigitte Nielsen also had a child at 55. Janet Jackson I had a child at 50. Cameron Diaz had a child in her late 40s. I would not be surprised if Jennifer Anderson has a child via IVF and or surrogacy.




She said pretty clearly she's done trying to get pregnant. Surrogacy is possible, I supposed, but I'm pretty sure she's said in the past she didn't want to be a single parent. So I think she's probably done, done.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 08:58     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
I don’t understand society‘s obsession with her and her uterus. She wants kids? Cool! She doesn’t want kids? Cool! Who cares why she doesn’t wanna have kids maybe she hates them or maybe she wanted to preserve her body.

I don’t know if it’s her PR team or society who keeps bringing this up but it’s boring news.
Anonymous
Post 11/12/2022 08:23     Subject: Aniston - Hollywood Reporter - kids
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:From THR
Jennifer Aniston “You have no clue what’s going with me personally, medically, why I can’t … can I have kids?” They don’t know anything, and it was really hurtful and just nasty.

I remember hearing you talk with Gloria Steinem about how it can feel like your value as a woman is tied to your marital status and whether or not you’ve procreated, to which Gloria said …

She said, “I guess we’re in deep shit.” (Laughs.) It’s the same with Dolly Parton; Dolly Parton never had kids. But are people giving her shit for it? No, no one’s tried to put her in a white picket fence.”

*****
Jen is still talking about kids! And states no one criticizes Dolly Parton for not having kids. Perhaps that’s because Dolly has never said she wanted kids or dreams her future on a beach with kids.

If she didn’t want the speculation then she should have stated long ago she can’t have kids. And with her money she could have had a surrogate have her kids. Or just state she never really wanted kids. She just needs to stop talking about it.


This may be her hinting that she’s going to have a child. In Hollywood, planting a seed is very common. Naomi Campbell recently had her first child at 55. Brigitte Nielsen also had a child at 55. Janet Jackson I had a child at 50. Cameron Diaz had a child in her late 40s. I would not be surprised if Jennifer Anderson has a child via IVF and or surrogacy.


Naomi was 51 but nevertheless I agree with your points.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10511855/She-wasnt-adopted-shes-child-Naomi-Campbell-51-reveals-daughters-face.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-10511855/She-wasnt-adopted-shes-child-Naomi-Campbell-51-reveals-daughters-face.html