Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With this raise, very soon the max of GS-14 is going to be as much as the high of GS-15 in DC and other high income localities. It won't be worth going for a job with more responsibility. The pay system for feds need to be revamped completely.
I would argue we are mostly at the point where switching from a high step 14 to a 15 is absolutely not worth the difference. I’m a 14 step 7. I don’t really see the value of going for a 15, which is so much more responsibility for a 15, step 4 for a less than a $12k increase and be immediately back into 2 years between steps anyway, so it’s not exactly a fast move up the ladder to additional increases. I’m due for my step 8 this year, I’m pretty happy with where I am with compensation versus workload/responsibilities. The 15s seem much more stressed and such.
14-6 due for my 7 next fall here, and I couldn't agree with you more. I wanted my 15 but took a step back and realized it was only for the sake of saying I got it. The money is not enough of a difference to lose sleep over.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With this raise, very soon the max of GS-14 is going to be as much as the high of GS-15 in DC and other high income localities. It won't be worth going for a job with more responsibility. The pay system for feds need to be revamped completely.
I would argue we are mostly at the point where switching from a high step 14 to a 15 is absolutely not worth the difference. I’m a 14 step 7. I don’t really see the value of going for a 15, which is so much more responsibility for a 15, step 4 for a less than a $12k increase and be immediately back into 2 years between steps anyway, so it’s not exactly a fast move up the ladder to additional increases. I’m due for my step 8 this year, I’m pretty happy with where I am with compensation versus workload/responsibilities. The 15s seem much more stressed and such.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This should be federal pay structure:
SES- $200,000 to $260,000
15 - $160,000 to $210,000 (non supervisory cap at $180k)
14 - $110,000 to $170,000 (non supervisory cap at $150k)
13 - $95,000 to $135,000 (non supervisory cap at $120k)
This pay structure would largely align with equivalent jobs in private sector
In what universe would this align with salaries for lawyers and doctors in the private sector?
I knew somebody would be too literal. What I meant was—i see my proposal as the “public sector equivalent.” We are never going to be paid $300k to $800k in public sector (maybe in the year 2050). My proposal ups the scale a good 20-30k for the 15 level and 50-60k for executive levels. At the rate we are going it would take 6 years (assuming a 2% increase each year) for a GS-15 to reach 200k. By then we’d be further behind.
But hey-this is all hypothetical!
Right, but capping non supervisory roles would actually be a pay cut for those of us who are with their grades and have moved up the ladder. I would never expect to be paid the equivalent of a private sector lawyer, but please don’t purpose to knock us down further. I’ve never even heard of a supervisory 14 attorney, yet most attorneys in my basically all attorney agency end up staying as 14s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This should be federal pay structure:
SES- $200,000 to $260,000
15 - $160,000 to $210,000 (non supervisory cap at $180k)
14 - $110,000 to $170,000 (non supervisory cap at $150k)
13 - $95,000 to $135,000 (non supervisory cap at $120k)
This pay structure would largely align with equivalent jobs in private sector
In what universe would this align with salaries for lawyers and doctors in the private sector?
I knew somebody would be too literal. What I meant was—i see my proposal as the “public sector equivalent.” We are never going to be paid $300k to $800k in public sector (maybe in the year 2050). My proposal ups the scale a good 20-30k for the 15 level and 50-60k for executive levels. At the rate we are going it would take 6 years (assuming a 2% increase each year) for a GS-15 to reach 200k. By then we’d be further behind.
But hey-this is all hypothetical!
Right, but capping non supervisory roles would actually be a pay cut for those of us who are with their grades and have moved up the ladder. I would never expect to be paid the equivalent of a private sector lawyer, but please don’t purpose to knock us down further. I’ve never even heard of a supervisory 14 attorney, yet most attorneys in my basically all attorney agency end up staying as 14s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This should be federal pay structure:
SES- $200,000 to $260,000
15 - $160,000 to $210,000 (non supervisory cap at $180k)
14 - $110,000 to $170,000 (non supervisory cap at $150k)
13 - $95,000 to $135,000 (non supervisory cap at $120k)
This pay structure would largely align with equivalent jobs in private sector
In what universe would this align with salaries for lawyers and doctors in the private sector?
I knew somebody would be too literal. What I meant was—i see my proposal as the “public sector equivalent.” We are never going to be paid $300k to $800k in public sector (maybe in the year 2050). My proposal ups the scale a good 20-30k for the 15 level and 50-60k for executive levels. At the rate we are going it would take 6 years (assuming a 2% increase each year) for a GS-15 to reach 200k. By then we’d be further behind.
But hey-this is all hypothetical!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This should be federal pay structure:
SES- $200,000 to $260,000
15 - $160,000 to $210,000 (non supervisory cap at $180k)
14 - $110,000 to $170,000 (non supervisory cap at $150k)
13 - $95,000 to $135,000 (non supervisory cap at $120k)
This pay structure would largely align with equivalent jobs in private sector
In what universe would this align with salaries for lawyers and doctors in the private sector?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With this raise, very soon the max of GS-14 is going to be as much as the high of GS-15 in DC and other high income localities. It won't be worth going for a job with more responsibility. The pay system for feds need to be revamped completely.
I would argue we are mostly at the point where switching from a high step 14 to a 15 is absolutely not worth the difference. I’m a 14 step 7. I don’t really see the value of going for a 15, which is so much more responsibility for a 15, step 4 for a less than a $12k increase and be immediately back into 2 years between steps anyway, so it’s not exactly a fast move up the ladder to additional increases. I’m due for my step 8 this year, I’m pretty happy with where I am with compensation versus workload/responsibilities. The 15s seem much more stressed and such.
Anonymous wrote:This should be federal pay structure:
SES- $200,000 to $260,000
15 - $160,000 to $210,000 (non supervisory cap at $180k)
14 - $110,000 to $170,000 (non supervisory cap at $150k)
13 - $95,000 to $135,000 (non supervisory cap at $120k)
This pay structure would largely align with equivalent jobs in private sector
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With this raise, very soon the max of GS-14 is going to be as much as the high of GS-15 in DC and other high income localities. It won't be worth going for a job with more responsibility. The pay system for feds need to be revamped completely.
I would argue we are mostly at the point where switching from a high step 14 to a 15 is absolutely not worth the difference. I’m a 14 step 7. I don’t really see the value of going for a 15, which is so much more responsibility for a 15, step 4 for a less than a $12k increase and be immediately back into 2 years between steps anyway, so it’s not exactly a fast move up the ladder to additional increases. I’m due for my step 8 this year, I’m pretty happy with where I am with compensation versus workload/responsibilities. The 15s seem much more stressed and such.
Anonymous wrote:With this raise, very soon the max of GS-14 is going to be as much as the high of GS-15 in DC and other high income localities. It won't be worth going for a job with more responsibility. The pay system for feds need to be revamped completely.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone know how this works for ses with a performance increase?
You don’t get an automatic increase. Individual SES increase is determined by your performance rating and comparison against other executives in the pool. If you were at the cap of your tier, you can realize your performance based increase up to the new cap of $203,700 (assuming you are level 2). For example, this year I earned a 5 rating (outstanding) and was given a 3.75 percent salary increase. I won’t get the full increase because it would put me over level 2. But I’ll realize 2.6 percent of the 3.75 percent in this situation. Had the cap not increased this year, I would not have realized any of that 3.75 percent performance pay increase.
Yeah, but SES receives their money in the big bonuses.