Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ certainly not within 2-3 generations

I imagine you are product of these find public schools. Unprecedented doesn't mean the last two or three generations.

The covid pandemic was unprecedented in terms of scale.

In 1918-19, this area was mostly rural farmland. It wasn’t affected like urban areas of the time.

Our schools boards have never dealt with something like this before. And they were cautious. So some parents got angry. And then they acted irrationally.

So you can't learn anything from history, because this area was farmlands? That's your argument? Urban areas aren't a uniquely modern invention of the last 10 years.

Like I said...our schools boards have never dealt with something like this on this scale before. And they were cautious. So some parents got angry. And then those parents acted irrationally.

As long as the FCDC and its proxies keep claiming that parents acted "irrationally," Democrats will keep losing contests in Virginia. I'd expect a big turnover on the FCPS School Board in 2023. The current members are widely despised for their incompetence and hypocrisy.

Interestingly, the more progressive Democrats have wasted little time in savaging McAuliffe for the campaign he ran. At least they admit their candidate was terrible, even if their solution - to nominate candidates further to the left - may not prove successful. The School Board proxies in the Democratic ranks, on the other hand, just keep burying their heads further into the sand.

LOL. You equate random anonymous posters on the interwebs with... elected officials or political organizations?

I'm starting to understand the "reasoning" that would lead someone to vote for Youngkin.

You're going to have to get much better at gaslighting. Pretending the FCDC proxies who post their opinions (and FCDC propaganda) constantly on Twitter don't also post on sites like DCUM is asking too much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am so disappointed in Virginia voters falling for lies and killing our schools. One year closed because of an over cautious response to a novel, global pandemic can be forgiven. Uneducated voters falling for propaganda and a modern Southern strategy voting in an administration that aims to kill public schools and a full education in favor of book banning and religious charter schools cannot. Not only will our kids and our schools suffer under this DeVos approach but so will our property values.

THis x1000. So many ignorant, knee-jerk, short sighted voters who fled to Youngkin. They are going to be so sadly disappointed. Stupid people. The "best" part is how self righteous they are about it. I just SMDH at how smart they think they are, when in reality that are ignorant as f@*&.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am so disappointed in Virginia voters falling for lies and killing our schools. One year closed because of an over cautious response to a novel, global pandemic can be forgiven. Uneducated voters falling for propaganda and a modern Southern strategy voting in an administration that aims to kill public schools and a full education in favor of book banning and religious charter schools cannot. Not only will our kids and our schools suffer under this DeVos approach but so will our property values.

THis x1000. So many ignorant, knee-jerk, short sighted voters who fled to Youngkin. They are going to be so sadly disappointed. Stupid people. The "best" part is how self righteous they are about it. I just SMDH at how smart they think they are, when in reality that are ignorant as f@*&.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ certainly not within 2-3 generations

I imagine you are product of these find public schools. Unprecedented doesn't mean the last two or three generations.

The covid pandemic was unprecedented in terms of scale.

In 1918-19, this area was mostly rural farmland. It wasn’t affected like urban areas of the time.

Our schools boards have never dealt with something like this before. And they were cautious. So some parents got angry. And then they acted irrationally.

So you can't learn anything from history, because this area was farmlands? That's your argument? Urban areas aren't a uniquely modern invention of the last 10 years.

Like I said...our schools boards have never dealt with something like this on this scale before. And they were cautious. So some parents got angry. And then those parents acted irrationally.

As long as the FCDC and its proxies keep claiming that parents acted "irrationally," Democrats will keep losing contests in Virginia. I'd expect a big turnover on the FCPS School Board in 2023. The current members are widely despised for their incompetence and hypocrisy.

Interestingly, the more progressive Democrats have wasted little time in savaging McAuliffe for the campaign he ran. At least they admit their candidate was terrible, even if their solution - to nominate candidates further to the left - may not prove successful. The School Board proxies in the Democratic ranks, on the other hand, just keep burying their heads further into the sand.

LOL. You equate random anonymous posters on the interwebs with... elected officials or political organizations?

I'm starting to understand the "reasoning" that would lead someone to vote for Youngkin.

You're going to have to get much better at gaslighting. Pretending the FCDC proxies who post their opinions (and FCDC propaganda) constantly on Twitter don't also post on sites like DCUM is asking too much.

Anonymous wrote:Just search "anti bias racism" for a treasure trove of board docs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ certainly not within 2-3 generations

I imagine you are product of these find public schools. Unprecedented doesn't mean the last two or three generations.

The covid pandemic was unprecedented in terms of scale.

In 1918-19, this area was mostly rural farmland. It wasn’t affected like urban areas of the time.

Our schools boards have never dealt with something like this before. And they were cautious. So some parents got angry. And then they acted irrationally.

So you can't learn anything from history, because this area was farmlands? That's your argument? Urban areas aren't a uniquely modern invention of the last 10 years.

Like I said...our schools boards have never dealt with something like this on this scale before. And they were cautious. So some parents got angry. And then those parents acted irrationally.

As long as the FCDC and its proxies keep claiming that parents acted "irrationally," Democrats will keep losing contests in Virginia. I'd expect a big turnover on the FCPS School Board in 2023. The current members are widely despised for their incompetence and hypocrisy.

Interestingly, the more progressive Democrats have wasted little time in savaging McAuliffe for the campaign he ran. At least they admit their candidate was terrible, even if their solution - to nominate candidates further to the left - may not prove successful. The School Board proxies in the Democratic ranks, on the other hand, just keep burying their heads further into the sand.

LOL. You equate random anonymous posters on the interwebs with... elected officials or political organizations?

I'm starting to understand the "reasoning" that would lead someone to vote for Youngkin.

Anonymous wrote:I am so disappointed in Virginia voters falling for lies and killing our schools. One year closed because of an over cautious response to a novel, global pandemic can be forgiven. Uneducated voters falling for propaganda and a modern Southern strategy voting in an administration that aims to kill public schools and a full education in favor of book banning and religious charter schools cannot. Not only will our kids and our schools suffer under this DeVos approach but so will our property values.

Anonymous wrote:Linking a presentation for one work session does not mean FCPS focused “more on social issues than actual education.”

More evidence of the reading and critical thinking skills of Youngkin voters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:School board didn’t follow the science, screwed parents and kids over, and Democrats answer by calling them uninformed and hysterical.

I wonder why Youngkin won?

At least he lost on Fairfax. Gives me some comfort that our voters can think broadly and critically enough to reject Youngkin’s race baiting and propaganda.

Except that MCAULIFFE was the race-baiting and propaganda-pushing candidate. Not Youngkin. All McAuliffe could babble about was "Trump this and Trump that!" Exactly how did Youngkin "race bait"? Oh, right. He didn't. Fail.

Every single time he mentioned CRT.

Pointing out that race-baiting has no place in public schools isn't race-baiting. And he is absolutely correct.

It’s not “race baiting” to say that systemic racism exists.

Focusing more on social issues such as "systemic racism," rather than actual education, is unacceptable.

https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BTFRCZ6CA62E/$file/Final%20Anti-Racism%20Anti-Bias%20Curriculum%20Work%20Session%20Sept%2014%202020.pdf

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is a frightening list. All those mommies who thought voting for Youngkin would stick it to the evil Democrats are going to be in for a shock.

Schultz is just vile. She was a terrible board member.

I’m a mommy who did this. First R vote ever. An good. After t*ts how last year, FCPS proved they should not have a monopoly or free education. If there had been charters and vouchers, FCPS would have had to open— or become defunct. Nothing wrong with making the, compete for students with the private sector.

Bring on charters, vouchers, magnets, smaller more specialized HSs, etc.

+1

Stop with the equity at the center of it all nonsense. The primary job of a school system is education. That should be their #1, #2 and #3 priorities.

Renaming schools, changing admissions to 1 HS, equity dashboards, etc. should be way down the agenda of a school board.

Not a public school board. Public schools are required by law to responsive to all, not cater to upper middle class children of privilege who were born on third and whose parents think they hit a triple.

If you want the things you list, private school is a legitimate option.

As a taxpayer, I am far more concerned that the needs of the underserved are met first and foremost.

Quality schools focused on education are only for those whose parents can pay.
Everyone else gets name changes and lowered standards.

Yay.

Please, the worst HS in FCPS is leaps and bounds above the majority in the US. Ridiculous.

Ahaha! Please keep thinking this. We left NOVA a few years ago and the difference in school quality has been startling. The public schools in our mid-size town are 1000% better than FCPS.

Yup!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:School board didn’t follow the science, screwed parents and kids over, and Democrats answer by calling them uninformed and hysterical.

I wonder why Youngkin won?

At least he lost on Fairfax. Gives me some comfort that our voters can think broadly and critically enough to reject Youngkin’s race baiting and propaganda.

Except that MCAULIFFE was the race-baiting and propaganda-pushing candidate. Not Youngkin. All McAuliffe could babble about was "Trump this and Trump that!" Exactly how did Youngkin "race bait"? Oh, right. He didn't. Fail.

Every single time he mentioned CRT.

Pointing out that race-baiting has no place in public schools isn't race-baiting. And he is absolutely correct.

It’s not “race baiting” to say that systemic racism exists.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ certainly not within 2-3 generations

I imagine you are product of these find public schools. Unprecedented doesn't mean the last two or three generations.

The covid pandemic was unprecedented in terms of scale.

In 1918-19, this area was mostly rural farmland. It wasn’t affected like urban areas of the time.

Our schools boards have never dealt with something like this before. And they were cautious. So some parents got angry. And then they acted irrationally.

So you can't learn anything from history, because this area was farmlands? That's your argument? Urban areas aren't a uniquely modern invention of the last 10 years.

Like I said...our schools boards have never dealt with something like this on this scale before. And they were cautious. So some parents got angry. And then those parents acted irrationally.

As long as the FCDC and its proxies keep claiming that parents acted "irrationally," Democrats will keep losing contests in Virginia. I'd expect a big turnover on the FCPS School Board in 2023. The current members are widely despised for their incompetence and hypocrisy.

Interestingly, the more progressive Democrats have wasted little time in savaging McAuliffe for the campaign he ran. At least they admit their candidate was terrible, even if their solution - to nominate candidates further to the left - may not prove successful. The School Board proxies in the Democratic ranks, on the other hand, just keep burying their heads further into the sand.