And it made sitting at the "adult table" a fun milestone especially with a glass of red wine with dinner. Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. They've always eaten what we make/give them. Never had any food issues. I don't expect them to sample one of everything over holidays. They eat, and stop once they're full.
My question is whether you're choosing what they eat at the holidays, or you're making an exception and allowing them to choose.
I'm asking because I have a family member who believes this -- that kids should eat what's put in front of them, which I understand in her home, but she's not an adventurous cook, so he kids are used to food being familiar. As we plan Christmas dinner, she keeps objecting to foods because she thinks her kids won't like it and she feels like it's mean to expect them to have to eat food they don't like at Christmas.
I'm trying to find a middle ground between unhappy kids, and the rest of us not having to eat foods that are "little kid friendly".
If you’re hosting the meal and cooking then ask your relative to bring something that her kids will eat.
We'll have a ton of things her kids will eat.
The issue is that she thinks that we should only have things her kids will eat. For example, there has been discussion of Beef Wellington. Her kids don't like mushrooms. But we'll also have ham, which they like, and mac and cheese which they love and turkey which they're OK with. So, the kids will not be protein deprived. Same with every food group.
Can you bill some things as the "main meal" and others as "bonus dishes" and convince her the kids only need to eat the main meal?
I'm hesitant to change how I talk to my own kids. So, for my kids, I don't want to tell them that the beef Wellington they helped prepare isn't part of the meal. If she wants to tell her kids that, I guess that's fine. I feel like if the goal is to eventually end up with kids who like a variety of foods including beef Wellington, that's not really gonna help. I think it's also going to invite comments if my kids don't eat something that has been declared the "main meal". Stating "look we have these delicious protein foods, you can pick one or more. I'm going to have beef Wellington and some turkey." is more likely to work.
I wrote the OP thinking that perhaps there was some feeding expert who advises this style of feeding, and that someone would say "Oh, I feed my kids that way too. I got it from X book" and I could go read X book, and then understand it and be able to problem solve. It really does seem, however, that that is not the case. Which makes me think that there is some dynamic I am overlooking. Without understanding that, I don't think I'm going to get anywhere with thinking up a compromise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. They've always eaten what we make/give them. Never had any food issues. I don't expect them to sample one of everything over holidays. They eat, and stop once they're full.
My question is whether you're choosing what they eat at the holidays, or you're making an exception and allowing them to choose.
I'm asking because I have a family member who believes this -- that kids should eat what's put in front of them, which I understand in her home, but she's not an adventurous cook, so he kids are used to food being familiar. As we plan Christmas dinner, she keeps objecting to foods because she thinks her kids won't like it and she feels like it's mean to expect them to have to eat food they don't like at Christmas.
I'm trying to find a middle ground between unhappy kids, and the rest of us not having to eat foods that are "little kid friendly".
If you’re hosting the meal and cooking then ask your relative to bring something that her kids will eat.
We'll have a ton of things her kids will eat.
The issue is that she thinks that we should only have things her kids will eat. For example, there has been discussion of Beef Wellington. Her kids don't like mushrooms. But we'll also have ham, which they like, and mac and cheese which they love and turkey which they're OK with. So, the kids will not be protein deprived. Same with every food group.
Can you bill some things as the "main meal" and others as "bonus dishes" and convince her the kids only need to eat the main meal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. They've always eaten what we make/give them. Never had any food issues. I don't expect them to sample one of everything over holidays. They eat, and stop once they're full.
My question is whether you're choosing what they eat at the holidays, or you're making an exception and allowing them to choose.
I'm asking because I have a family member who believes this -- that kids should eat what's put in front of them, which I understand in her home, but she's not an adventurous cook, so he kids are used to food being familiar. As we plan Christmas dinner, she keeps objecting to foods because she thinks her kids won't like it and she feels like it's mean to expect them to have to eat food they don't like at Christmas.
I'm trying to find a middle ground between unhappy kids, and the rest of us not having to eat foods that are "little kid friendly".
If you’re hosting the meal and cooking then ask your relative to bring something that her kids will eat.
We'll have a ton of things her kids will eat.
The issue is that she thinks that we should only have things her kids will eat. For example, there has been discussion of Beef Wellington. Her kids don't like mushrooms. But we'll also have ham, which they like, and mac and cheese which they love and turkey which they're OK with. So, the kids will not be protein deprived. Same with every food group.
Can you bill some things as the "main meal" and others as "bonus dishes" and convince her the kids only need to eat the main meal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No idea if this would work for your family but perhaps having the meal buffet style with a separate childrens' table? Seems less likely that the adults will notice what the kids are eating.
OP here,
Am I the only one who really hates the children's table? I'd rather serve all "kid friendly food" then banish my children from the table.
Np I always sat at the “kids table” during large family gatherings. I had the absolute best time with my cousins. We played lots of games and I really enjoyed eating with them. I have about 10 cousins my age. And when we all started having kids in our 30s, we started the youngest generation table. There’s nothing wrong with a kid table. I had to eat with my parents every night.
The kids aren't eating with their own parents, they're eating with grandparents, great grandparents, aunts, uncles, whoever they choose. I'm not saying that other people shouldn't do a kids' table. I would like to figure out a solution that doesn't take away the things my children like, whether those are certain foods, or sitting next to a relative they don't get to see very often.
I guess we spent the entire day with our extended relatives. Our Thanksgivings had 60+ people at them, so it was pretty obvious there were "nicer" tables and then folding tables with not as nice china. The oldest generation got to sit at the best tables and youngest sat at the worst. We usually moved to new tables for dessert too. Still, eating with cousins is very special. I know my parents enjoyed eating with their siblings/cousins/aunts too. I think kids tables are great because then the kids can go play games while the adults chat much, much longer over coffee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. They've always eaten what we make/give them. Never had any food issues. I don't expect them to sample one of everything over holidays. They eat, and stop once they're full.
My question is whether you're choosing what they eat at the holidays, or you're making an exception and allowing them to choose.
I'm asking because I have a family member who believes this -- that kids should eat what's put in front of them, which I understand in her home, but she's not an adventurous cook, so he kids are used to food being familiar. As we plan Christmas dinner, she keeps objecting to foods because she thinks her kids won't like it and she feels like it's mean to expect them to have to eat food they don't like at Christmas.
I'm trying to find a middle ground between unhappy kids, and the rest of us not having to eat foods that are "little kid friendly".
If you’re hosting the meal and cooking then ask your relative to bring something that her kids will eat.
We'll have a ton of things her kids will eat.
The issue is that she thinks that we should only have things her kids will eat. For example, there has been discussion of Beef Wellington. Her kids don't like mushrooms. But we'll also have ham, which they like, and mac and cheese which they love and turkey which they're OK with. So, the kids will not be protein deprived. Same with every food group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No idea if this would work for your family but perhaps having the meal buffet style with a separate childrens' table? Seems less likely that the adults will notice what the kids are eating.
OP here,
Am I the only one who really hates the children's table? I'd rather serve all "kid friendly food" then banish my children from the table.
Np I always sat at the “kids table” during large family gatherings. I had the absolute best time with my cousins. We played lots of games and I really enjoyed eating with them. I have about 10 cousins my age. And when we all started having kids in our 30s, we started the youngest generation table. There’s nothing wrong with a kid table. I had to eat with my parents every night.
The kids aren't eating with their own parents, they're eating with grandparents, great grandparents, aunts, uncles, whoever they choose. I'm not saying that other people shouldn't do a kids' table. I would like to figure out a solution that doesn't take away the things my children like, whether those are certain foods, or sitting next to a relative they don't get to see very often.