Anonymous
12/14/2021 11:19
Subject: RW vs LW news
It is one thing to be covering news with a slant. It is another entirely to do what Fox and OAN did in terms of outright propaganda and gaslighting.
Anonymous
Anonymous
12/13/2021 17:04
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't like it, it doesn't just become left wing or liberal. Where are the lies? The propaganda? The ridiculous out of context examples that apply to nothing? Sensationalizing material as more important at times, maybe, but nothing is untrue. You'll have to give examples. I really haven't seen any.
RW media...yes, lies, propaganda, and cherry picking. All the time, and getting worse.
At some point the right wing decided it was OK to automatically and immediately label any news that was contrary to their narratives and worldview as "fake news."
It's disturbing. Some of us are old enough to remember when the right wing didn't do that - Reagan, for example, famously said "trust, but verify." Today's right wing verifies nothing, they automatically trust their "trusted" sources and automatically and immediately label anything contrary as "fake" and "leftist."
It's a retreat into delusional fantasy bubbles and echo chambers and allow bad actors to distort, lie and propagandize completely unchecked in any way whatsoever.
How do we fix the broken right wing?
Understand why they no longer have social trust? I take issue with lying by omission, which the media in general tends to do a lot of.
Anonymous
12/12/2021 10:10
Subject: RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:LOL, see the tweet above, there is inflation, but it isn't "runaway" inflation. You are a sucker for fake news. You are buying into the narrative.
So, highest in how many years, and still rising?
Anonymous
12/12/2021 09:27
Subject: RW vs LW news
LOL, see the tweet above, there is inflation, but it isn't "runaway" inflation. You are a sucker for fake news. You are buying into the narrative.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
12/10/2021 18:07
Subject: RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:We heard nothing but "her emails" for 6 years.
We have a 38 page Coup powerpoint and the media has already moved on.
If that doesn't tell you everything you need to know that the main stream media isn't "liberal" I don't know what will.
+1 And Mark Meadows was using private email for government business as well.
Anonymous
12/10/2021 17:59
Subject: RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:We heard nothing but "her emails" for 6 years.
We have a 38 page Coup powerpoint and the media has already moved on.
If that doesn't tell you everything you need to know that the main stream media isn't "liberal" I don't know what will.
There are still those who will argue with the point, but I agree. It’s obvious.
Anonymous
12/10/2021 17:46
Subject: RW vs LW news
We heard nothing but "her emails" for 6 years.
We have a 38 page Coup powerpoint and the media has already moved on.
If that doesn't tell you everything you need to know that the main stream media isn't "liberal" I don't know what will.
We have a 38 page Coup powerpoint and the media has already moved on.
If that doesn't tell you everything you need to know that the main stream media isn't "liberal" I don't know what will.
Anonymous
12/10/2021 11:22
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't like it, it doesn't just become left wing or liberal. Where are the lies? The propaganda? The ridiculous out of context examples that apply to nothing? Sensationalizing material as more important at times, maybe, but nothing is untrue. You'll have to give examples. I really haven't seen any.
RW media...yes, lies, propaganda, and cherry picking. All the time, and getting worse.
At some point the right wing decided it was OK to automatically and immediately label any news that was contrary to their narratives and worldview as "fake news."
It's disturbing. Some of us are old enough to remember when the right wing didn't do that - Reagan, for example, famously said "trust, but verify." Today's right wing verifies nothing, they automatically trust their "trusted" sources and automatically and immediately label anything contrary as "fake" and "leftist."
It's a retreat into delusional fantasy bubbles and echo chambers and allow bad actors to distort, lie and propagandize completely unchecked in any way whatsoever.
How do we fix the broken right wing?
Ironically, Reagan was the cause and/or beginning of so much right wing craziness.
Anonymous
Anonymous
12/10/2021 08:43
Subject: Re:RW vs LW news
Anonymous wrote:Just because you don't like it, it doesn't just become left wing or liberal. Where are the lies? The propaganda? The ridiculous out of context examples that apply to nothing? Sensationalizing material as more important at times, maybe, but nothing is untrue. You'll have to give examples. I really haven't seen any.
RW media...yes, lies, propaganda, and cherry picking. All the time, and getting worse.
At some point the right wing decided it was OK to automatically and immediately label any news that was contrary to their narratives and worldview as "fake news."
It's disturbing. Some of us are old enough to remember when the right wing didn't do that - Reagan, for example, famously said "trust, but verify." Today's right wing verifies nothing, they automatically trust their "trusted" sources and automatically and immediately label anything contrary as "fake" and "leftist."
It's a retreat into delusional fantasy bubbles and echo chambers and allow bad actors to distort, lie and propagandize completely unchecked in any way whatsoever.
How do we fix the broken right wing?