Anonymous wrote:My kids did pee wee soccer in preschool, then lost interest. I've never regretted that. So much time lost on weekends to sports when you can relax with your kids, or go to the zoo. I just never saw the point of wasting all that time. I guess the time is more important to me than the money, although that is excessive, too. No regrets.
Anonymous wrote:It is difficult for a person who has invested a lot of resources (time, energy, money) in an activity to admit that the resources were not well-spent. A person will defend their decisions so as to avoid the hit to their ego. It’s a very human reaction to criticism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My story is very similar to OP but zero regrets.
I'd rather have my kids playing sports (which they still love) learning discipline, commitment, being active and around other kids that love the sport, than all day at home doing nothing.
If only those weren’t the only two options. Oh, wait. They aren’t!
This. There are lots of ways for kids to play sports and be active, even at high levels, without being on travel sports teams that dominate and disrupt the entire family. Travel sports are, honestly, a scam. Kids can play in local leagues and school leagues. If they are talented and you have the means, you can invest in private training. You don’t need to be spending every weekend in hotels for your kid to develop skills and a love for the sport. You definitely don’t need to do this to help your kid be active!
The worst part is that often siblings of the kid on a travel team are stuck doing nothing on these trips while their sibling is playing. How is that any different than sitting around at home all day? You think being in a car and then sitting around hotel rooms and athletic complexes are better for these kids than being home? No.
Sports are great. Travel sports are dumb investments for sucker parents who are too insecure, obsessive, and competitive to see that they are a waste of time and money. When I meet a kid in travel sports, I lose respect for their parents. Maybe one in a thousand, or one in ten thousand, of these kids is so talented and invested in that sport it’s worth it. But otherwise? What a dumb thing to spend money and precious family years on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My story is very similar to OP but zero regrets.
I'd rather have my kids playing sports (which they still love) learning discipline, commitment, being active and around other kids that love the sport, than all day at home doing nothing.
If only those weren’t the only two options. Oh, wait. They aren’t!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I look at high school athletics from the perspective that it keeps them BUSY. No time for playing endless video games or getting into trouble. Often, a busy athlete is a better student because they learn to organize their academic life. Bonus: they stay in shape too. Think positive OP.
It's funny that this is so many people's attitudes. I was not a busy kid (teen). But, I also wasn't a trouble maker or a couch potato.
100%. The only thing that kept me off drugs in HS was that I had soccer practice. No joke, sports saved me. I have a curious and mischievous mind.
I'm glad to see you went down a better path, but what did sports do? To me, I would think if a kid wants to experiment with drugs they're going to no matter if they are busy or not.
Not true. Ever heard the saying "An idle mind is the devil's workshop"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you are overthinkiing things. I ask my son what he wants to do, accept the spot or not. He is old enough to make a decision about what he wants to do. If he wants to put his time and energy towards travel soccer, great. We have only one kid and earn decent salaries, so why not? If he wanted to drop it and do something else, that would be ok too.
This "My other kids have had to keep some of their activities to a minimum because of the oldest. I don't blame anyone but myself for this, though."![]()
I know you blame yourself for this, but why would you slight your other kids so the oldest can fulfill his desire to play soccer?
OP Here!
Thanks for the question! Essentially they let me know what activities they wanted to get into, specifically DD who is 7yo. Her dance/ballet classes she wanted directly conflicted with the days my son's travel team practiced. I thought about leaving my son at practice early, he is 15yo btw, but the two locations were about 10 mi apart so I would spend 3 of 5 weekdays traveling back and forth after work, hoping I didn't crash and nothing happened to my oldest at practice. I chose not to have that headache and my 7yo DD is currently doing rec soccer at the same club my oldest plays at.
You've changed your DDs age by two years. And I cannot roll my eyes hard enough at "hoping I didn't crash."
But whatever, go ahead and sink your relationship with what I sincerely hope is your imaginary son.
No, she didn’t. She has at least three kids. Reading is fundamental.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for all the comments! I actually didn't mean to put down any colleges, we are looking to stay in Virginia for college though, so that was my mindset and I didn't mention it in the post.
For deciding for my child, I think at this point I still have that authority. What will happen is my DD will now not have to choose her ballet or softball and other activities around her older brothers soccer practice schedule. We said no to her this year because the activities she wanted were exactly on the days my oldest practiced. Can't split myself in two so she joined rec soccer on the days my oldest practiced. Not a terrible outcome, but it wasn't what she wanted. My youngest is 5 yo and is glad to be out and spending time with other kids, so he is fine for now.
While I don't regret having spent time with my DS at practices or games, if you honestly look at it, I really wasn't spending time with him. He was at practice and I was on the sidelines. I have had a chance to go for runs so I'm not just sitting, but I could do that in my neighborhood park after actually having spent time with my children. To be clear, the fact that we wouldn't do travel soccer doesn't mean I would not spend time with them, in fact we would spend more time together.
Sure you have the authority. Obviously you do. But after nine years of pushing a kid, it is a toxic approach to ending his soccer career for him. You made that choice for him when he was little, he invested time and energy because of you, and now you are going to pull the rug from out under him? Are you trying to destroy your relationship? Make him resent his sibling, who is too young to even remember any activities?
He is a junior. He isn't a little kid. Involve him in the decision. Maybe he will find a way to get to practice on his own. Maybe he can drive. Your unilateral approach is terrible.
The DD who didn’t get to do dance or the things she wanted to do for years of her childhood isn’t “too young to remember any activities.” The 5 year old is a younger son.
God, you obsessive sports parents are gross,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you are overthinkiing things. I ask my son what he wants to do, accept the spot or not. He is old enough to make a decision about what he wants to do. If he wants to put his time and energy towards travel soccer, great. We have only one kid and earn decent salaries, so why not? If he wanted to drop it and do something else, that would be ok too.
This "My other kids have had to keep some of their activities to a minimum because of the oldest. I don't blame anyone but myself for this, though."![]()
I know you blame yourself for this, but why would you slight your other kids so the oldest can fulfill his desire to play soccer?
OP Here!
Thanks for the question! Essentially they let me know what activities they wanted to get into, specifically DD who is 7yo. Her dance/ballet classes she wanted directly conflicted with the days my son's travel team practiced. I thought about leaving my son at practice early, he is 15yo btw, but the two locations were about 10 mi apart so I would spend 3 of 5 weekdays traveling back and forth after work, hoping I didn't crash and nothing happened to my oldest at practice. I chose not to have that headache and my 7yo DD is currently doing rec soccer at the same club my oldest plays at.
You've changed your DDs age by two years. And I cannot roll my eyes hard enough at "hoping I didn't crash."
But whatever, go ahead and sink your relationship with what I sincerely hope is your imaginary son.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I look at high school athletics from the perspective that it keeps them BUSY. No time for playing endless video games or getting into trouble. Often, a busy athlete is a better student because they learn to organize their academic life. Bonus: they stay in shape too. Think positive OP.
It's funny that this is so many people's attitudes. I was not a busy kid (teen). But, I also wasn't a trouble maker or a couch potato.
100%. The only thing that kept me off drugs in HS was that I had soccer practice. No joke, sports saved me. I have a curious and mischievous mind.
I'm glad to see you went down a better path, but what did sports do? To me, I would think if a kid wants to experiment with drugs they're going to no matter if they are busy or not.
Not true. Ever heard the saying "An idle mind is the devil's workshop"?
Anonymous wrote:My story is very similar to OP but zero regrets.
I'd rather have my kids playing sports (which they still love) learning discipline, commitment, being active and around other kids that love the sport, than all day at home doing nothing.