Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

The nail in the coffin for this theory is the photos on Josh's phone that line up perfectly with the times the CP was being downloaded. The photos are of post-it notes ON that desk where the computer was located that was downloading the CP.

It seems like when the prosecution gets to redirect after cross, they are reiterating that point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

Yeah I'm sure the remote hacker who had the password to his work computer, bank account and family Instagram account just used it to download child porn to a secret partition on his work computer and nothing else.

But the burden is not on him to prove it wasn't his computer. The burden is on the prosecution to prove Josh Duggar was knowingly in possession of this material.

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

Yeah I'm sure the remote hacker who had the password to his work computer, bank account and family Instagram account just used it to download child porn to a secret partition on his work computer and nothing else.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

Well, he was the only one there, so it’s not like they can blame someone else at the car lot. The head of the division that handles this stuff showed the jury how the partition was set up, and how the remote access wasn’t possible. They’re trying to poke holes in the prosecutions evidence, and doing a terrible job, IMO. It isn’t believable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I got an answer, from a journalist. If anyone wants to see her reporting, she can be found here: https://youtube.com/c/ WithoutACrystalBall

The DD video was fragmented, and was not viewable, but after the evidence that came out yesterday, the reporting is going to stop saying “kids as young as 7,” as that is not accurate. If you want to hear why, feel free to watch yesterday’s coverage of what happened in court. He tried to blame two close friends, who weren’t at the dealership when it was downloaded. Also, the feds found Josh’s name and address in the partitioned side of the computer.

I’m fairly confident he will be spending decades in federal prison. His enabling family members can rot in hell. It’s obvious they don’t care about girls.

NP. This hack is NOT a journalist!! Breaking the link in the quote, to not inadvertently drive more clicks to her "reporting".

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

I’m not computer savvy so I don’t understand what I’m about to repeat, but I heard they refuted any possibility of remoting in and were able to prove the downloads were done at a time they have photos of Josh at the computer while they were surveilling him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

I’m not computer savvy so I don’t understand what I’m about to repeat, but I heard they refuted any possibility of remoting in and were able to prove the downloads were done at a time they have photos of Josh at the computer while they were surveilling him.

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

Anonymous wrote:They’re trying to set it up that someone hacked the computer remotely to set Josh up. It’s not a bad defense strategy and could well set up reasonable doubt for some…. The investigators failed to take all the equipment and can’t rule remote access out this far

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Subway sandwich guy got 15 years in prison via a plea deal. But he was facing child pornography AND child sex tourism charges.

I’m still trying to figure out why Josh opted to go to trial. It was a mistake, and he’s going to have decades in prison to think it over.

I'm sure they prayed and prayed on it, and God answered by telling them he wants Josh to be in jail for the maximum amount of time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PLEASE do NOT post details about any of this material. This thread is not marked with a trigger warning. Many people are following who don’t want to know those hellish details.

+10000

PLEASE DO NOT

I think the fact that this is a thread about the trial of a pedophile IS the trigger warning.

It didn’t start that way since the thread started with him in federal custody without knowing what the charges and eventual trial were going to be about. But at this point everyone knows what he’s on trial for and should be well aware of what they’re clicking on. That being said, what good comes from posting the specific details??

Can Jeff lock this thread and start another with a trigger warning in the title?

DP, I don't understand why people would click on this thread if they're easily triggered by this kind of stuff. We all know about Josh Duggar's history, and the charges. They're sickening obviously, but a "trigger warning" isn't necessary. Take some personal accountability and stop reading.