The LS head mentioned more than once at the open house that they are "waiting for someone" to write a multimillion dollar check to fund new athletic fields. I thought it was pretty tacky.
College placement is too important to STA for them to waste too many spots on average or weak academic performers, no matter how rich and generous the parents are. The reputation is too important.
College placement is too important to STA for them to waste too many spots on average or weak academic performers, no matter how rich and generous the parents are. The reputation is too important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. Those are your thoughts. You have no evidence to suggest the child will struggle at STA. A SSAT score less than 99.9 percentile doesn't mean a student will struggle academically, does it? You do not have to be the sharpest tool in the shed to get the job done. What are your thoughts about all the students at STA that are in the bottom quartile of performers? Someone will be in the bottom quartile ... even at STA. Are any of these students "struggling"? How many? How do you assess "struggling"? By definition, are all passing students in the bottom quartile struggling?
No one said anything about this child scoring anywhere near the 99.9% level, in fact, I believe it said he was not a strong student at his current school. There are lots of options for underachieving and average students. I wouldn't think STA would be one of them. You seem very defensive. Are you a big donor with high hopes?
No one said anything about this child scoring anywhere near the 99.9% level, in fact, I believe it said he was not a strong student at his current school. There are lots of options for underachieving and average students. I wouldn't think STA would be one of them. You seem very defensive. Are you a big donor with high hopes?
No one said anything about this child scoring anywhere near the 99.9% level, in fact, I believe it said he was not a strong student at his current school. There are lots of options for underachieving and average students. I wouldn't think STA would be one of them. You seem very defensive. Are you a big donor with high hopes?
Anonymous wrote:No. Those are your thoughts. You have no evidence to suggest the child will struggle at STA. A SSAT score less than 99.9 percentile doesn't mean a student will struggle academically, does it? You do not have to be the sharpest tool in the shed to get the job done. What are your thoughts about all the students at STA that are in the bottom quartile of performers? Someone will be in the bottom quartile ... even at STA. Are any of these students "struggling"? How many? How do you assess "struggling"? By definition, are all passing students in the bottom quartile struggling?
Also, being incredibly rich doesn't guarantee a spot at STA. I know of a very nice, bright boy whose parents are among the richest in the area who was rejected for 4th grade.
Anonymous wrote:If these are big time donors and the kid can walk, talk and chew gum at the same time he is a shoo in. Good as gold. The kid doesn't need to be an academic or athletic superstar -- a ATM superstar is an acceptable hook. All other things being equal, any private school would be foolish not to accept the child of a heavy financial hitter. Everyone in a class can't graduate at #1. Since when was average performance considered a failure.