Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Yeah and Daventry had a low number too when they petitioned to move from Lewis to WSHS. SB approved it and school age population in the area shot up. Which is one reason why WSHS is crowded now. They shouldn’t move anyone else into WSHS boundary if there moving other kids out. Also it’s not fair to Lewis.

You absolutely cannot compare Daventry and that cluster of townhomes with 20 kids.

Sorry, I don't mean to sound difficult, but how can they move only 20 kids from Rolling to WS and the rest to Saratoga? Those numbers seem off to me.

They are rezoning almkst 300 townhouses to WSHS from Lewis.

The fcps math ain't mathin'

I'm missing the sense in this. Why would Sandy have pushed for this with all their purported goals?

Scenario 4 for this area ticked two boxes. Reduced overcrowding and removed split feeder. It didn’t check all their boxes but it did check two.

The Robinson Pyramid kept all four of their split feeders. Clearly fixing split feeders was not the larger FCPS priority.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Yeah and Daventry had a low number too when they petitioned to move from Lewis to WSHS. SB approved it and school age population in the area shot up. Which is one reason why WSHS is crowded now. They shouldn’t move anyone else into WSHS boundary if there moving other kids out. Also it’s not fair to Lewis.

You absolutely cannot compare Daventry and that cluster of townhomes with 20 kids.

Sorry, I don't mean to sound difficult, but how can they move only 20 kids from Rolling to WS and the rest to Saratoga? Those numbers seem off to me.

They are rezoning almkst 300 townhouses to WSHS from Lewis.

The fcps math ain't mathin'

I'm missing the sense in this. Why would Sandy have pushed for this with all their purported goals?

Scenario 4 for this area ticked two boxes. Reduced overcrowding and removed split feeder. It didn’t check all their boxes but it did check two.

Anonymous wrote:No - they’re getting rid of the current RV split feeder in scenario 4. From the existing split feeder - the townhomes north of the parkway would be RV/Irving/WS, and the portion of the existing split feeder south of the parkway would be Saratoga/Key/Lewis.

They were all currently RV/Key/Lewis.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Yeah and Daventry had a low number too when they petitioned to move from Lewis to WSHS. SB approved it and school age population in the area shot up. Which is one reason why WSHS is crowded now. They shouldn’t move anyone else into WSHS boundary if there moving other kids out. Also it’s not fair to Lewis.

You absolutely cannot compare Daventry and that cluster of townhomes with 20 kids.

Sorry, I don't mean to sound difficult, but how can they move only 20 kids from Rolling to WS and the rest to Saratoga? Those numbers seem off to me.

They are rezoning almkst 300 townhouses to WSHS from Lewis.

The fcps math ain't mathin'

I'm missing the sense in this. Why would Sandy have pushed for this with all their purported goals?

That is what Sangster, Hunt Valley and most of the WS neighborhoods have been asking for over a year now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Yeah and Daventry had a low number too when they petitioned to move from Lewis to WSHS. SB approved it and school age population in the area shot up. Which is one reason why WSHS is crowded now. They shouldn’t move anyone else into WSHS boundary if there moving other kids out. Also it’s not fair to Lewis.

You absolutely cannot compare Daventry and that cluster of townhomes with 20 kids.

Sorry, I don't mean to sound difficult, but how can they move only 20 kids from Rolling to WS and the rest to Saratoga? Those numbers seem off to me.

They are rezoning almkst 300 townhouses to WSHS from Lewis.

The fcps math ain't mathin'

I'm missing the sense in this. Why would Sandy have pushed for this with all their purported goals?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Are you saying there are no new areas?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Pearls=clutched

Ok, I'm trying to get this all straight. They are moving 99 kids from West Orange Hunt (Sangster) to LB, they bring in 20 kids from Rolling Valley (that seems weirdly low to me that they would have ever had a split feeder with only 20 kids, but let's go with it). So that reduces WS by 79 kids. Where's the rest of the reduction comes from?

The Keene Mill Island to White Oaks. Also, only Rolling Valley north of the parkway is going to WSHS. The rest is moving to Saratoga.

So only 20 kids at Rolling will go to WS and the rest to Saratoga?

It is going to be closer to 100 kids when all the teenagers living in that Rolling Valley neighborhood come back from the schools they pupil placed into and the Catholic high schools.

And now suddenly those neighborhoods are more attractive to people looking to buy in the area as well. Seriously they should have known this would happen with what happened in the past with Daventry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Pearls=clutched

Ok, I'm trying to get this all straight. They are moving 99 kids from West Orange Hunt (Sangster) to LB, they bring in 20 kids from Rolling Valley (that seems weirdly low to me that they would have ever had a split feeder with only 20 kids, but let's go with it). So that reduces WS by 79 kids. Where's the rest of the reduction comes from?

The Keene Mill Island to White Oaks. Also, only Rolling Valley north of the parkway is going to WSHS. The rest is moving to Saratoga.

So only 20 kids at Rolling will go to WS and the rest to Saratoga?

That doesn't sound right to me. It would create a worse split feeder. But I don't know that area at all

There won’t be a split feeder anymore - the areas that are mostly TH’s north of the parkway will go RV - Irving - WSHS like the rest of Rolling Valley, and the homes south of the parkway will go out of RVES to Saratoga. And they were nominally at Key-Lewis anyway.

I think I'm still missing something. At RVES there will be literally only 20 students going to Irving/WSHS and all the rest go to Saratoga?

Wouldn't this be a split feeder where like 2% of the student population goes to WS? That makes zero sense

No. Stop. You’re really confused. In both scenarios RVES would no longer be a split feeder 100% would go to WSHS. The students that previously went to RVES that were zoned to Lewis would move to Saratoga.

Not all the RV students

Nearly 300 RV homes that are currently zoned to Lewis are getting rezoned to WSHS.

Only a few RV houses are getting mived to Saratoga

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Pearls=clutched

Ok, I'm trying to get this all straight. They are moving 99 kids from West Orange Hunt (Sangster) to LB, they bring in 20 kids from Rolling Valley (that seems weirdly low to me that they would have ever had a split feeder with only 20 kids, but let's go with it). So that reduces WS by 79 kids. Where's the rest of the reduction comes from?

The Keene Mill Island to White Oaks. Also, only Rolling Valley north of the parkway is going to WSHS. The rest is moving to Saratoga.

So only 20 kids at Rolling will go to WS and the rest to Saratoga?

That doesn't sound right to me. It would create a worse split feeder. But I don't know that area at all

There won’t be a split feeder anymore - the areas that are mostly TH’s north of the parkway will go RV - Irving - WSHS like the rest of Rolling Valley, and the homes south of the parkway will go out of RVES to Saratoga. And they were nominally at Key-Lewis anyway.

I think I'm still missing something. At RVES there will be literally only 20 students going to Irving/WSHS and all the rest go to Saratoga?

Wouldn't this be a split feeder where like 2% of the student population goes to WS? That makes zero sense

No. Stop. You’re really confused. In both scenarios RVES would no longer be a split feeder 100% would go to WSHS. The students that previously went to RVES that were zoned to Lewis would move to Saratoga.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Yeah and Daventry had a low number too when they petitioned to move from Lewis to WSHS. SB approved it and school age population in the area shot up. Which is one reason why WSHS is crowded now. They shouldn’t move anyone else into WSHS boundary if there moving other kids out. Also it’s not fair to Lewis.

You absolutely cannot compare Daventry and that cluster of townhomes with 20 kids.

Sorry, I don't mean to sound difficult, but how can they move only 20 kids from Rolling to WS and the rest to Saratoga? Those numbers seem off to me.

They are rezoning almkst 300 townhouses to WSHS from Lewis.

The fcps math ain't mathin'

I'm missing the sense in this. Why would Sandy have pushed for this with all their purported goals?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Pearls=clutched

Ok, I'm trying to get this all straight. They are moving 99 kids from West Orange Hunt (Sangster) to LB, they bring in 20 kids from Rolling Valley (that seems weirdly low to me that they would have ever had a split feeder with only 20 kids, but let's go with it). So that reduces WS by 79 kids. Where's the rest of the reduction comes from?

The Keene Mill Island to White Oaks. Also, only Rolling Valley north of the parkway is going to WSHS. The rest is moving to Saratoga.

So only 20 kids at Rolling will go to WS and the rest to Saratoga?

That doesn't sound right to me. It would create a worse split feeder. But I don't know that area at all

There won’t be a split feeder anymore - the areas that are mostly TH’s north of the parkway will go RV - Irving - WSHS like the rest of Rolling Valley, and the homes south of the parkway will go out of RVES to Saratoga. And they were nominally at Key-Lewis anyway.

I think I'm still missing something. At RVES there will be literally only 20 students going to Irving/WSHS and all the rest go to Saratoga?

Wouldn't this be a split feeder where like 2% of the student population goes to WS? That makes zero sense

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Yeah and Daventry had a low number too when they petitioned to move from Lewis to WSHS. SB approved it and school age population in the area shot up. Which is one reason why WSHS is crowded now. They shouldn’t move anyone else into WSHS boundary if there moving other kids out. Also it’s not fair to Lewis.

You absolutely cannot compare Daventry and that cluster of townhomes with 20 kids.

Sorry, I don't mean to sound difficult, but how can they move only 20 kids from Rolling to WS and the rest to Saratoga? Those numbers seem off to me.

They are rezoning almkst 300 townhouses to WSHS from Lewis.

The fcps math ain't mathin'

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.

Can you please get your facts straight? "Homes" are not students. Many people who live in 'homes' don't have kids. What I want to know is exactly how many 'students' they are actually moving from Lewis at Rolling Valley to West Springfield?

If you look at the delta in Lewis enrollment for scenario 4, the answer is 20.

Pearls=clutched

Ok, I'm trying to get this all straight. They are moving 99 kids from West Orange Hunt (Sangster) to LB, they bring in 20 kids from Rolling Valley (that seems weirdly low to me that they would have ever had a split feeder with only 20 kids, but let's go with it). So that reduces WS by 79 kids. Where's the rest of the reduction comes from?

The Keene Mill Island to White Oaks. Also, only Rolling Valley north of the parkway is going to WSHS. The rest is moving to Saratoga.

So only 20 kids at Rolling will go to WS and the rest to Saratoga?

That doesn't sound right to me. It would create a worse split feeder. But I don't know that area at all

There won’t be a split feeder anymore - the areas that are mostly TH’s north of the parkway will go RV - Irving - WSHS like the rest of Rolling Valley, and the homes south of the parkway will go out of RVES to Saratoga. And they were nominally at Key-Lewis anyway.

I think I'm still missing something. At RVES there will be literally only 20 students going to Irving/WSHS and all the rest go to Saratoga?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why bring new areas to WSHS, better keep areas which are already there to minimize disruption, if overcrowding is suddenly not an issue. How does this make any sense?

WSHS LOST over 250 homes. Stop this nonsense you are trying. Same poster. Over and over again talking to yourself.