Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m actually surprised the right wing press hasn’t picked up on Option 3 yet. It would be so easy to bash progressive DEI with it.

You are overestimating how much the rest of the country cares about your property values.

You are underestimating how much the right wing press likes to bash DEI and crazy progressives.

It doesn't make for the types of headlines they like. What will it say? "White kids potentially forced to endure 40 minute instead of 30 minute bus rides to lower income schools with Black and Hispanic kids"?

I mean, it’s walkers they are trying to bus 45 minutes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m actually surprised the right wing press hasn’t picked up on Option 3 yet. It would be so easy to bash progressive DEI with it.

You are overestimating how much the rest of the country cares about your property values.

You are underestimating how much the right wing press likes to bash DEI and crazy progressives.

It doesn't make for the types of headlines they like. What will it say? "White kids potentially forced to endure 40 minute instead of 30 minute bus rides to lower income schools with Black and Hispanic kids"?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m resigning myself mentally to option 3. It will be fine, the bussing crowd will be happy, and kids with long bus rides will move or go to private.

Are you personally impacted by option 3?

Yes, but there are so many other things to worry about, like the crushing blows to Science in the US. There’s just too much going on.

There is little science at some MCPS schools. We have no ap science. It’s sad what’s going on.

Can you share what MCPS high school has no AP science? I am surprised to hear that and not sure it’s accurate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m actually surprised the right wing press hasn’t picked up on Option 3 yet. It would be so easy to bash progressive DEI with it.

You are overestimating how much the rest of the country cares about your property values.

You are underestimating how much the right wing press likes to bash DEI and crazy progressives.

Anonymous wrote:https://wjla.com/news/local/school-boundary-study-map-plans-for-montgomery-county-maryland-schools-mcps-generates-concerns-charles-w-woodward-high-crown-high-school-damascus-public-engagement-sessions#

Attracting attention from ABC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m resigning myself mentally to option 3. It will be fine, the bussing crowd will be happy, and kids with long bus rides will move or go to private.

Are you personally impacted by option 3?

Yes, but there are so many other things to worry about, like the crushing blows to Science in the US. There’s just too much going on.

There is little science at some MCPS schools. We have no ap science. It’s sad what’s going on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m actually surprised the right wing press hasn’t picked up on Option 3 yet. It would be so easy to bash progressive DEI with it.

You are overestimating how much the rest of the country cares about your property values.

They care as the higher it is, the more taxes they get.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the FARMS rate isn't a great idea as Focus and Title One schools get (or used to) get additional gov't funding.

That’s a good point. I know it’s a big deal in DC if a school loses Title I status. Is the same true in MD?

Yes, it is a big deal as a lot of funding is lost, from extra staff to school lunches.

And that funding is federal, correct?

State and federal. But it really helps lower income kids lower schools. Most funding comes from the county when you look at the overall budget but when you hear about lower class sizes, everyone on free breakfast and lunches, that’s how it gets paid.

Anonymous wrote:I’m actually surprised the right wing press hasn’t picked up on Option 3 yet. It would be so easy to bash progressive DEI with it.

You are overestimating how much the rest of the country cares about your property values.

I’m actually surprised the right wing press hasn’t picked up on Option 3 yet. It would be so easy to bash progressive DEI with it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the FARMS rate isn't a great idea as Focus and Title One schools get (or used to) get additional gov't funding.

That’s a good point. I know it’s a big deal in DC if a school loses Title I status. Is the same true in MD?

Yes, it is a big deal as a lot of funding is lost, from extra staff to school lunches.

And that funding is federal, correct?

I try to keep up, but isn’t a lot of that being reduced and/or cancelled (or potentially cancelled) anyways?

Not yet at any rate. Pretty sure you need a law change for that. (Not just eliminating Dept of Education)

To add: option 3 would almost certainly incur the administration’s ire given now beyond the pale it is. So option 3 might just result in a withholding of Title 1 funding.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the FARMS rate isn't a great idea as Focus and Title One schools get (or used to) get additional gov't funding.

That’s a good point. I know it’s a big deal in DC if a school loses Title I status. Is the same true in MD?

Yes, it is a big deal as a lot of funding is lost, from extra staff to school lunches.

And that funding is federal, correct?

I try to keep up, but isn’t a lot of that being reduced and/or cancelled (or potentially cancelled) anyways?

Not yet at any rate. Pretty sure you need a law change for that. (Not just eliminating Dept of Education)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the FARMS rate isn't a great idea as Focus and Title One schools get (or used to) get additional gov't funding.

That’s a good point. I know it’s a big deal in DC if a school loses Title I status. Is the same true in MD?

Yes, it is a big deal as a lot of funding is lost, from extra staff to school lunches.

And that funding is federal, correct?

I try to keep up, but isn’t a lot of that being reduced and/or cancelled (or potentially cancelled) anyways?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Changing the FARMS rate isn't a great idea as Focus and Title One schools get (or used to) get additional gov't funding.

That’s a good point. I know it’s a big deal in DC if a school loses Title I status. Is the same true in MD?

Yes, it is a big deal as a lot of funding is lost, from extra staff to school lunches.

And that funding is federal, correct?