Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, six unelected judges just told women yo go f*ck themselves if they become pregnant because, as informed by their own religious beliefs, the Constitutions says they no longer have autonomy to make their own medical decisions, whether in consultation with a spouse or partner, or in their own. They become mere incubators because of Catholic orthodoxy about the magicsl act of fertilization.
That's not what they said ... but you are too dumb to get legal decisions vs. moral ones. All the did was put it back to the federal and state and local legislatures to address it as clear laws vs. a murky interpretation of the constitution. Now, go lobby and vote and get your legislators to pass the law you want. It is now in your hands.
Again, for those in the back who can't hear:
Why should basic, fundamental right to one's own health care decisions be up to vote by fellow citizens with extremist positions?
Do you think that's what should have happened before the Civil War in regards to slavery? Just let the citizens of a state decide if some people can be enslaved or not?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So eloquently and perfectly stated. I have yet to meet a woman able to claim immaculate conception. Be accountable for your actions, whether a burden to your lifestyle of want or not.
F#$k Off! You and your right-wing, MAGA friend are evertything wrong with the US. Almost every abortion that happens is because result of a$$holes like you lying stealing and taking advantage of innocent women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, six unelected judges just told women yo go f*ck themselves if they become pregnant because, as informed by their own religious beliefs, the Constitutions says they no longer have autonomy to make their own medical decisions, whether in consultation with a spouse or partner, or in their own. They become mere incubators because of Catholic orthodoxy about the magicsl act of fertilization.
That's not what they said ... but you are too dumb to get legal decisions vs. moral ones. All the did was put it back to the federal and state and local legislatures to address it as clear laws vs. a murky interpretation of the constitution. Now, go lobby and vote and get your legislators to pass the law you want. It is now in your hands.
Again, for those in the back who can't hear:
Why should basic, fundamental right to one's own health care decisions be up to vote by fellow citizens with extremist positions?
Do you think that's what should have happened before the Civil War in regards to slavery? Just let the citizens of a state decide if some people can be enslaved or not?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well, six unelected judges just told women yo go f*ck themselves if they become pregnant because, as informed by their own religious beliefs, the Constitutions says they no longer have autonomy to make their own medical decisions, whether in consultation with a spouse or partner, or in their own. They become mere incubators because of Catholic orthodoxy about the magicsl act of fertilization.
That's not what they said ... but you are too dumb to get legal decisions vs. moral ones. All the did was put it back to the federal and state and local legislatures to address it as clear laws vs. a murky interpretation of the constitution. Now, go lobby and vote and get your legislators to pass the law you want. It is now in your hands.
Anonymous wrote:
Well, six unelected judges just told women yo go f*ck themselves if they become pregnant because, as informed by their own religious beliefs, the Constitutions says they no longer have autonomy to make their own medical decisions, whether in consultation with a spouse or partner, or in their own. They become mere incubators because of Catholic orthodoxy about the magicsl act of fertilization.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judism recognizes life at birth, not conception.
So why are Christian beliefs being given preferential treatment over my beliefs?
This ruling goes against religious freedom and is thus unconstitutional.
I think there need to be criminal referrals for perjury made to DoJ for Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett because THEY ALL LIED UNDER OATH. There should be immediate impeachment hearings started against them - Clinton was impeached for less. They need to be removed from SCOTUS and any decisions that they drove the majority on should be considered illegitimate as their nominations were illegitimate.
I agree with the broader sentiment, but "what is Constitutional" is what the SCOTUS says.
So...we have a legitimacy issue which is a constitutional crisis.
Yes, we are in a constitutional crisis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judism recognizes life at birth, not conception.
So why are Christian beliefs being given preferential treatment over my beliefs?
This ruling goes against religious freedom and is thus unconstitutional.
I think there need to be criminal referrals for perjury made to DoJ for Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett because THEY ALL LIED UNDER OATH. There should be immediate impeachment hearings started against them - Clinton was impeached for less. They need to be removed from SCOTUS and any decisions that they drove the majority on should be considered illegitimate as their nominations were illegitimate.
I agree with the broader sentiment, but "what is Constitutional" is what the SCOTUS says.
So...we have a legitimacy issue which is a constitutional crisis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The last few years have been so deliciously enlightening.
We’ve witnessed the extent to which the liberal left will propagate mass hysteria to motivate universal mask mandates; this, under the guise of protecting the vulnerable amongst us but, in truth, a selfishly ignorant attempt by Democrats and liberals solely to protect themselves. How else can one explain the abandoning of noble principles so quickly in the face of abortion? We’re pro-life when it comes to protecting an older immunocompromised life but pro-choice when it comes to eliminating a younger immunocompromised life?!? Impossible, of course; the only life being considered in both scenarios is that of the mask-wearing, child-bearing narcissist maximizing their own comfort and pleasure at the expense of all else…while vehemently and deceitfully professing the exact opposite, of course!
We’ve seen Robinhood-using, reddit-reading, retail-investing SAHMs – and other unemployables – wreak havoc on the stock market with their unbridled liberal greed. So quick to find the means necessary to manipulate the market, but so slow to realize that abortion has not suddenly been made illegal. Only the constitutional pro-choice mandate has been eliminated. We’ve done nothing more than empower states to make individual decisions regarding the matter. I thought pro-choice was good and that underrepresented lives mattered?!?!?!? You can always take that meme stock profit and stimulus check money and use it to travel to California, New York, or some other unethical state to have your immoral abortion there.
We’ve witnessed student loan forgiveness for the indolent and avaricious amongst us, those that made imprudent choices and foolish commitments and then later decided to not honor the same. Those too unintelligent to enroll in STEM fields or too shiftless to push their careers to material levels of success. Now, these very same liberal and licentious individuals are refusing to be held accountable for their iniquitous lifestyles and promiscuous behavior. It takes effort to conceive a child and it certainly doesn’t happen unwittingly. This is much worse than the liberal elite wanting to have their cake and eat it too. This constitutes a veritable eating of your neighbor’s cake as well and then defecating the remains to deliver as tithe against a soulless future.
My body, my choice? Exactly, says the fetus whose developing body is being raped and murdered by an egregiously devious strumpet.
So eloquently and perfectly stated. I have yet to meet a woman able to claim immaculate conception. Be accountable for your actions, whether a burden to your lifestyle of want or not.
Anonymous wrote:So eloquently and perfectly stated. I have yet to meet a woman able to claim immaculate conception. Be accountable for your actions, whether a burden to your lifestyle of want or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Judism recognizes life at birth, not conception.
So why are Christian beliefs being given preferential treatment over my beliefs?
This ruling goes against religious freedom and is thus unconstitutional.
I think there need to be criminal referrals for perjury made to DoJ for Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett because THEY ALL LIED UNDER OATH. There should be immediate impeachment hearings started against them - Clinton was impeached for less. They need to be removed from SCOTUS and any decisions that they drove the majority on should be considered illegitimate as their nominations were illegitimate.
I agree with the broader sentiment, but "what is Constitutional" is what the SCOTUS says.
So...we have a legitimacy issue which is a constitutional crisis.