Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to live in a country where an armed guard is necessary for my kids to go to school safely. Moreover one armed guard isn’t sufficient. Should we arm the kids next??? This is insanity. It’s guns. It’s choosing to live in a state of warfare vs. peace.
Read the second amendment. “Well regulated” are words that do not mean anything goes.
The disconnect is unreal. It’s the I assume it will not matter to me, take NRA money, look the other way, move on. It’s just 21 families I don’t know and don’t care about.
Why isn't one armed guard not sufficient?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can states require that ammunition/bullets be prohibitively expensive with no shipment to other states? Is there stuff that can be done by some states to try and protect? It’s obviously not a fleshed out idea. I just feel like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks at this point.
Of course they can. Check out gas and cigarette taxes.
However, if you make it "prohibitively expensive", it would not be constitutional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can states require that ammunition/bullets be prohibitively expensive with no shipment to other states? Is there stuff that can be done by some states to try and protect? It’s obviously not a fleshed out idea. I just feel like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks at this point.
Of course they can. Check out gas and cigarette taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can states require that ammunition/bullets be prohibitively expensive with no shipment to other states? Is there stuff that can be done by some states to try and protect? It’s obviously not a fleshed out idea. I just feel like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks at this point.
Of course they can. Check out gas and cigarette taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can states require that ammunition/bullets be prohibitively expensive with no shipment to other states? Is there stuff that can be done by some states to try and protect? It’s obviously not a fleshed out idea. I just feel like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks at this point.
Of course they can. Check out gas and cigarette taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Can states require that ammunition/bullets be prohibitively expensive with no shipment to other states? Is there stuff that can be done by some states to try and protect? It’s obviously not a fleshed out idea. I just feel like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only upside is this and Buffalo should hopefully put an end to that “good guy with a gun” bull$hit.
What exactly are you talking about?
“The only thing that will stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”
Both Buffalo and this school had “good guys with guns” and they did not stop the bad guy with the gun. So I don’t want to hear that anymore as a retort to calls for gun control.
What might happen if we had more good guys with guns?
Question:
Why do you think these raging boys target schools?
Answer:
They know it’s a “gun free zone”.
They ain’t dumb. They want to finally do something big that EVERYONE will notice and remember. High time to get effective help for struggling teens, especially if they’re from broken homes like most killers are.
It wasn’t a gun free zone, idiot. The teachers could carry and the security guard was armed.
There was no armed security guard. That was initially reported, but later corrected.
I just posted on previous page that a new timeline was released tonight showing that he shot OUTSIDE for 12 minutes.
It’s almost like a cry for help, and nobody answered. It’s clear there was fail, after fail, after fail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Schools now HAVE 211 Billion unspent covid dollars. Let’s see if some of that can be used to get a highly trained armed guard in every public school that wants one. It could even be a veteran or retired cop. Why not?
Is there some company on here that is in the biz of supplying school guards? We want to get rid of the guns...not bring more of them into our schools. How many times do we need to say the same thing. Learn to read.
Anonymous wrote:
Schools now HAVE 211 Billion unspent covid dollars. Let’s see if some of that can be used to get a highly trained armed guard in every public school that wants one. It could even be a veteran or retired cop. Why not?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only upside is this and Buffalo should hopefully put an end to that “good guy with a gun” bull$hit.
What exactly are you talking about?
“The only thing that will stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”
Both Buffalo and this school had “good guys with guns” and they did not stop the bad guy with the gun. So I don’t want to hear that anymore as a retort to calls for gun control.
What might happen if we had more good guys with guns?
Question:
Why do you think these raging boys target schools?
Answer:
They know it’s a “gun free zone”.
They ain’t dumb. They want to finally do something big that EVERYONE will notice and remember. High time to get effective help for struggling teens, especially if they’re from broken homes like most killers are.
It wasn’t a gun free zone, idiot. The teachers could carry and the security guard was armed.
There was no armed security guard. That was initially reported, but later corrected.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to live in a country where an armed guard is necessary for my kids to go to school safely. Moreover one armed guard isn’t sufficient. Should we arm the kids next??? This is insanity. It’s guns. It’s choosing to live in a state of warfare vs. peace.
Read the second amendment. “Well regulated” are words that do not mean anything goes.
The disconnect is unreal. It’s the I assume it will not matter to me, take NRA money, look the other way, move on. It’s just 21 families I don’t know and don’t care about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um, criminals will ALWAYS get a way to commit “mass” murder. They do NOT obey laws.
No, they actually don’t. That’s why other countries don’t have these mass murder problems. Because they are stopped.
Criminals in other countries actually get serious consequences. American criminals these days are largely protected from harsh consequences. How about you address that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um, criminals will ALWAYS get a way to commit “mass” murder. They do NOT obey laws.
So we have to get rid of guns and ammunition.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um, criminals will ALWAYS get a way to commit “mass” murder. They do NOT obey laws.
No, they actually don’t. That’s why other countries don’t have these mass murder problems. Because they are stopped.