Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for the FBI to raid a certain Chicago home looking for the 30 million documents promised to be digitized.
This is such a galactically stupid post. So much so that I imagine it'll be worked into this weekend's talking points.
It's already been out there. I saw it on Facebook on Wednesday.
His failure to digitize the documents is not illegal because he had all of the right permissions to take them.
Oh! if you saw it on Facebook then it must be true!![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still waiting for the FBI to raid a certain Chicago home looking for the 30 million documents promised to be digitized.
This is such a galactically stupid post. So much so that I imagine it'll be worked into this weekend's talking points.
It's already been out there. I saw it on Facebook on Wednesday.
His failure to digitize the documents is not illegal because he had all of the right permissions to take them.
Anonymous wrote:Riddle me this... why did Merrick Garland approve this search warrant but not for the Unibomber?
https://www.foxnews.com/media/merrick-garland-recommend-approval-ag-search-warrant-unabombers-cabin-former-fbi-official
Lawyers defending Unabomber suspect Theodore Kaczynski accused FBI agents Friday of lying to convince a judge last year to permit them to search Kaczynski’s Montana cabin.
The charge prompted a prosecutor to angrily reply that agents needed to move quickly to protect public safety.
With Kaczynski seated at the defense table, the former UC Berkeley math professor’s lawyers cited several instances when they say agents either lied or misled U.S. District Judge Charles Lovell of Montana last April when they persuaded him to issue the search warrant.
Defense lawyers Quin Denvir and Judy Clarke made the comments in an effort to convince U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell, the Sacramento judge who is presiding over Kaczynski’s case, to throw out the guts of the prosecution’s case--evidence seized from the cabin.
Prosecutors acknowledge there may have been misstatements in the massive search warrant affidavit, and that some passages may have been unclear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love the smell of Trumper’s sweet salty tears in the morning.
Trumper tears should be a coffee brand.
Cofeve!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:who thinks the nuclear weapons angle was leaked to WaPo by Trump so that whatever is released tomorrow will seem less urgent in comparison. something seems off about all this. in any event, i will sleep a lot better if it's NOT about nuclear weapons.
It’s about nuclear weapons.
Any of our resident Trump apologists want to please explain why Trump would want to have documents on nuclear weapons?
How do you know that’s what he has? Because a leaker told the WaPo? I’m a bit more skeptical I guess than most - I like to see hard evidence.