Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it Ironic that the "swamp" is behind getting rid of Moore. The growing conservative base in the Senate with Lee, Cruz and Rubio is causing trouble for the establishment on both sides of the aisle. McCain's credibility has long been suspicious in my mind and this is a concerted effort of the establishment politics.

Ironic? Lee is a 'Never Trumper'.

Lee is a Constitutional Conservative. McCain is a never Trumper... get your facts right junior.

Your party is tearing itself apart and the worst of them are winning. Congratulations!

Says the person who's party fell apart long ago with "rigged" primaries and the past 8 years of ignoring the Constitution with EO after EO. Lol!

Defender of traitors and pedophiles says what?

Anonymous wrote:Again, why suddenly now? This man has been a career politician his entire life.

Are the stakes for another Democrat lost election too great this time?

Let's be honest here.

Ever try coherence?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it Ironic that the "swamp" is behind getting rid of Moore. The growing conservative base in the Senate with Lee, Cruz and Rubio is causing trouble for the establishment on both sides of the aisle. McCain's credibility has long been suspicious in my mind and this is a concerted effort of the establishment politics.

Ironic? Lee is a 'Never Trumper'.

Lee is a Constitutional Conservative. McCain is a never Trumper... get your facts right junior.

Your party is tearing itself apart and the worst of them are winning. Congratulations!

Says the person who's party fell apart long ago with "rigged" primaries and the past 8 years of ignoring the Constitution with EO after EO. Lol!

Again, why suddenly now? This man has been a career politician his entire life.

Are the stakes for another Democrat lost election too great this time?

Let's be honest here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In a court of law, sure. But this is politics. The stories are as airtight as they could be with plenty of 3rd party verification.

Politics should be treated the same. As should the workplace. As should a college environment. Unless you are advocating for a banana republic, trash anyone you want for whatever you want?

Let me guess: You think Jerry Sandusky was framed?

Anonymous wrote:Also, JFC - I realize you are a bunch of Trump loving partisan idiot trolls here defending this disgusting man. But were you in a coma while your definitely not old and fat hero Donald Trump was shouting to lock Hillary Clinton up - and you were all creaming your pants over it? Now you're worried about rule of law and banana republicans?

I'm sure you can twist your tiny, addled brains into explaining how that was *totally* different.

Well aren't you charming? You must get all the girls!

I believe Trump was speaking of locking her up if, in fact, she committed crimes. I believe we who support him are speaking of due process and the fact that the Clintons seem to be above the law. These women are simply to be believed but the women who came forward about Bill Clinton? Nope.

It's not just about timing. Look the heading of this thread. Already tried and convicted a pedophile in your minds. If this thread started with .... Bin Ali, the pedophile, or Bill Clinton, the pedophile, Jeff would have deleted it, stating that there was no evidence either was a pedophile or changed the title to 'alleged'. And we have lots of people on this thread stating 'all's fair in politics' and 'due process is not necessary in politics', and advocating for a dishonest press.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand that way of thinking. I've always been a cynical person and perhaps I am simply wired to question everything, especially conveniently timed stories, where one of the accusers is a democratic activist who's worked for Biden and Clinton. And about an election that is very important to Democrats regarding the balance of the Senate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Absent any new and credible information coming out, Moore will win and do so decisively ......... and liberals will fume away like they have been doing about Trump's victory.

You go ahead and celebrate electing a self-righteous pedophile to Congress. Seems about right given the conservative track record.

Seriously - anti-immigrant but pro-pedophilia! What a party!

Anonymous wrote:Absent any new and credible information coming out, Moore will win and do so decisively ......... and liberals will fume away like they have been doing about Trump's victory.

You go ahead and celebrate electing a self-righteous pedophile to Congress. Seems about right given the conservative track record.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it Ironic that the "swamp" is behind getting rid of Moore. The growing conservative base in the Senate with Lee, Cruz and Rubio is causing trouble for the establishment on both sides of the aisle. McCain's credibility has long been suspicious in my mind and this is a concerted effort of the establishment politics.

Ironic? Lee is a 'Never Trumper'.

Lee is a Constitutional Conservative. McCain is a never Trumper... get your facts right junior.

Your party is tearing itself apart and the worst of them are winning. Congratulations!

^ Banana republics, not banana republicans. But Banana republicans would be accurate, too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it Ironic that the "swamp" is behind getting rid of Moore. The growing conservative base in the Senate with Lee, Cruz and Rubio is causing trouble for the establishment on both sides of the aisle. McCain's credibility has long been suspicious in my mind and this is a concerted effort of the establishment politics.

Ironic? Lee is a 'Never Trumper'.

Lee is a Constitutional Conservative. McCain is a never Trumper... get your facts right junior.

Also, JFC - I realize you are a bunch of Trump loving partisan idiot trolls here defending this disgusting man. But were you in a coma while your definitely not old and fat hero Donald Trump was shouting to lock Hillary Clinton up - and you were all creaming your pants over it? Now you're worried about rule of law and banana republicans?

I'm sure you can twist your tiny, addled brains into explaining how that was *totally* different.

He was always going to win, unless Republicans change the election date and get him off the ballot. And even then he might win.

It sickens me, and yet I also can't help but feel that the Republicans party is finally just out there showing its true colors. No need for a mask anymore, or to pretend to be anything other than what it is.

This isn't going to hurt the Democrats. This has nothing to do with Democrats, frankly. This is all you, Republicans.

Anonymous wrote:In a court of law, sure. But this is politics. The stories are as airtight as they could be with plenty of 3rd party verification.

Politics should be treated the same. As should the workplace. As should a college environment. Unless you are advocating for a banana republic, trash anyone you want for whatever you want?

Anonymous wrote:I find it Ironic that the "swamp" is behind getting rid of Moore. The growing conservative base in the Senate with Lee, Cruz and Rubio is causing trouble for the establishment on both sides of the aisle. McCain's credibility has long been suspicious in my mind and this is a concerted effort of the establishment politics.

Ironic? Lee is a 'Never Trumper'.