Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Bub, I'm going to clue you in to something, because clearly nobody else in your life is. It's obvious from your posts that you get your news from Fox News, Drudge, Newsmax, and the Washington Times. You are being hoodwinked. Taken for a fool. Deluded because you lack the sophistication to spot obvious distortions, half-truths, or outright lies.
Those of us living in the real world - consuming news from a wide variety of sources, produced by actual journalists and not partisan hacks pretending to be - know that Republicans are incredibly unlikely to prevail.
Weird because you sound like what politicos euphemistically refer to a "low-information voter."
Every Republican accusation is a confession. I hope you escape from your echo chamber someday.
You sound very Trump-y, the way you ignore substantive arguments and just call people names and repeat moronic bumper sticker slogans you read somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Bub, I'm going to clue you in to something, because clearly nobody else in your life is. It's obvious from your posts that you get your news from Fox News, Drudge, Newsmax, and the Washington Times. You are being hoodwinked. Taken for a fool. Deluded because you lack the sophistication to spot obvious distortions, half-truths, or outright lies.
Those of us living in the real world - consuming news from a wide variety of sources, produced by actual journalists and not partisan hacks pretending to be - know that Republicans are incredibly unlikely to prevail.
Weird because you sound like what politicos euphemistically refer to a "low-information voter."
Every Republican accusation is a confession. I hope you escape from your echo chamber someday.
You sound very Trump-y, the way you ignore substantive arguments and just call people names and repeat moronic bumper sticker slogans you read somewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Bub, I'm going to clue you in to something, because clearly nobody else in your life is. It's obvious from your posts that you get your news from Fox News, Drudge, Newsmax, and the Washington Times. You are being hoodwinked. Taken for a fool. Deluded because you lack the sophistication to spot obvious distortions, half-truths, or outright lies.
Those of us living in the real world - consuming news from a wide variety of sources, produced by actual journalists and not partisan hacks pretending to be - know that Republicans are incredibly unlikely to prevail.
Weird because you sound like what politicos euphemistically refer to a "low-information voter."
Every Republican accusation is a confession. I hope you escape from your echo chamber someday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Bub, I'm going to clue you in to something, because clearly nobody else in your life is. It's obvious from your posts that you get your news from Fox News, Drudge, Newsmax, and the Washington Times. You are being hoodwinked. Taken for a fool. Deluded because you lack the sophistication to spot obvious distortions, half-truths, or outright lies.
Those of us living in the real world - consuming news from a wide variety of sources, produced by actual journalists and not partisan hacks pretending to be - know that Republicans are incredibly unlikely to prevail.
Weird because you sound like what politicos euphemistically refer to a "low-information voter."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Hm. Perhaps if Republicans spent less time banning books and more time reading them, they could acquire greater fluency with the language.
Here's the language:
“Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?”
A normal person is not going to know what "restore fairness" means. It also doesn't mention that redistricting in the middle of a decade is very unusual. It's also misleading because it refers to "the upcoming elections" but this initiative actually covers the next two election cycles.
You can't leave shit out or try to hide the ball about what you're really doing.
Of course a "normal" person is going to understand these things.
Even dumbass MAGA knows what the language is talking about.
Even you, who is particularly moronic, know exactly what it refers to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Bub, I'm going to clue you in to something, because clearly nobody else in your life is. It's obvious from your posts that you get your news from Fox News, Drudge, Newsmax, and the Washington Times. You are being hoodwinked. Taken for a fool. Deluded because you lack the sophistication to spot obvious distortions, half-truths, or outright lies.
Those of us living in the real world - consuming news from a wide variety of sources, produced by actual journalists and not partisan hacks pretending to be - know that Republicans are incredibly unlikely to prevail.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
They'll never take away anyone's right to vote because that would be too obvious. Instead, they'll do things to make your vote completely meaningless. That is how you disenfranchise people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Hm. Perhaps if Republicans spent less time banning books and more time reading them, they could acquire greater fluency with the language.
Here's the language:
“Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to allow the General Assembly to temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections, while ensuring Virginia's standard redistricting process resumes for all future redistricting after the 2030 census?”
A normal person is not going to know what "restore fairness" means. It also doesn't mention that redistricting in the middle of a decade is very unusual. It's also misleading because it refers to "the upcoming elections" but this initiative actually covers the next two election cycles.
You can't leave shit out or try to hide the ball about what you're really doing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We had a ban on gerrymandering.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Ok. If you don’t like that then push the GOP to ban gerrymandering.
Why? So you can do a popular vote and remove representation.
Why? To end gerrymandering.
Are you ok with gerrymandering or not?
Not nationally.
Are you ok with gerrymandering or not?
it is a state issue ban it in va
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Hm. Perhaps if Republicans spent less time banning books and more time reading them, they could acquire greater fluency with the language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else think the Republican whining is a bit…unseemly? I can’t help but thinking about the little pipsqeak on the playground who bullies the big kid for years, then cries bloody murder when the big kid punches him back once and knocks him flat on his back.
AOC said it best when she said, “Wah wah wah.” I can’t help but see children every time I see Republican white men whining about injustice.
This is going to result in Democrats winning 10 of Virginia's 11 House districts. Reminder: Virginia is purple state. That's completely ridiculous. Why don't you just ban Republicans from voting altogether?
If 48.5% of Virginians vote repuplican but maps reduce them to just 1 of 11 seats (9.1%), then nearly half the state has been compressed into only 9% representation.
That means they lost about 81% of their political voice when seats are allocated.
Maybe if Republicans has conducted themselves differently in the past few years, more than 48.5% would have voted against this measure.
+1. The voters have spoken. That is how we are supposed to settle things here.
Is that a joke? People didn't even understand what they were voting for. It was just "if you hate Trump vote this way." That's what ballot initiatives always do. They do something sleazy and then they sell it to the public by saying "vote yes if you love puppies."
https://www.npr.org/2026/04/20/nx-s1-5790809/virginia-redistricting-election-trump-gerrymandering
https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2026/04/21/virginia-redistricting-election-voter-confusion
https://wtop.com/virginia/2026/04/why-some-virginia-voters-find-redistricting-ballot-question-confusing/
https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/virginia-congressional-map-ballot-measure-b12f9b2a
Are you saying Republicans were too stupid to understand the language on the initiative? Hilarious self-own.
You sound like a bratty teenager. Maybe you should listen to the adults who say this is obviously going to be struck down by the courts because the language used on the ballot was plainly deceptive. If there's one thing you absolutely cannot do with these things, it's use misleading language on the ballot. You have to be extremely clear about what is being proposed.
Hm. Perhaps if Republicans spent less time banning books and more time reading them, they could acquire greater fluency with the language.