Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.

I’m not a neutral poster, I’ve been saying I’m pro-Lively here for quite some time. Really, in anti-Freedman, but whatevs. I even offered to meet people in person, which I’m pretty sure a PR rep wouldn’t do, but nobody from the Baldoni team was up for that lol. Then you guys started asking for all sorts of personal info and wanted Lively supporters to post under logins. Wut? No. I owe you nothing.

I’m a pro Lively DMV area lawyer who has been right about a lot more than any of the Baldoni people have. I’m not a shill and I’m not being paid by anyone. Sorry if I can’t take it too seriously when I’m lectured on this by a supporter of the creepy dude who hired Amber Heard’s crisis PR team.

By ‘neutral’ I meant not paid. You’re obviously pro lively and will twist and turn any facts to get there.

If you’d like to meet, why don’t you take a first step and just start posting under a screen name here? Can still be anonymous. No one asked you for ‘all sorts of personal info’ in any real way. People are just tired of how obvious your PR push is and want you to stop droning on with nonsense.

As far as you being a lawyer, who knows? Who cares? I’m sure failed lawyers can become low level PR shills too. As many people on here have noted, for all your hours and hours just ‘randomly’ reading and listening to court documents and arguments, your analytical skills are not great, and you often write like an unintelligent and mean teen girl with your ‘lols’ of yourself and ‘sorry not sorry’ style.

I don't know which Lively poster is which but the Lively posters have generally predicted more legal outcomes correctly, so their analysis is fine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.

I’m not a neutral poster, I’ve been saying I’m pro-Lively here for quite some time. Really, in anti-Freedman, but whatevs. I even offered to meet people in person, which I’m pretty sure a PR rep wouldn’t do, but nobody from the Baldoni team was up for that lol. Then you guys started asking for all sorts of personal info and wanted Lively supporters to post under logins. Wut? No. I owe you nothing.

I’m a pro Lively DMV area lawyer who has been right about a lot more than any of the Baldoni people have. I’m not a shill and I’m not being paid by anyone. Sorry if I can’t take it too seriously when I’m lectured on this by a supporter of the creepy dude who hired Amber Heard’s crisis PR team.

By ‘neutral’ I meant not paid. You’re obviously pro lively and will twist and turn any facts to get there.

If you’d like to meet, why don’t you take a first step and just start posting under a screen name here? Can still be anonymous. No one asked you for ‘all sorts of personal info’ in any real way. People are just tired of how obvious your PR push is and want you to stop droning on with nonsense.

As far as you being a lawyer, who knows? Who cares? I’m sure failed lawyers can become low level PR shills too. As many people on here have noted, for all your hours and hours just ‘randomly’ reading and listening to court documents and arguments, your analytical skills are not great, and you often write like an unintelligent and mean teen girl with your ‘lols’ of yourself and ‘sorry not sorry’ style.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.

I’m not a neutral poster, I’ve been saying I’m pro-Lively here for quite some time. Really, in anti-Freedman, but whatevs. I even offered to meet people in person, which I’m pretty sure a PR rep wouldn’t do, but nobody from the Baldoni team was up for that lol. Then you guys started asking for all sorts of personal info and wanted Lively supporters to post under logins. Wut? No. I owe you nothing.

I’m a pro Lively DMV area lawyer who has been right about a lot more than any of the Baldoni people have. I’m not a shill and I’m not being paid by anyone. Sorry if I can’t take it too seriously when I’m lectured on this by a supporter of the creepy dude who hired Amber Heard’s crisis PR team.

By ‘neutral’ I meant not paid. You’re obviously pro lively and will twist and turn any facts to get there.

If you’d like to meet, why don’t you take a first step and just start posting under a screen name here? Can still be anonymous. No one asked you for ‘all sorts of personal info’ in any real way. People are just tired of how obvious your PR push is and want you to stop droning on with nonsense.

As far as you being a lawyer, who knows? Who cares? I’m sure failed lawyers can become low level PR shills too. As many people on here have noted, for all your hours and hours just ‘randomly’ reading and listening to court documents and arguments, your analytical skills are not great, and you often write like an unintelligent and mean teen girl with your ‘lols’ of yourself and ‘sorry not sorry’ style.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.

I’m not a neutral poster, I’ve been saying I’m pro-Lively here for quite some time. Really, in anti-Freedman, but whatevs. I even offered to meet people in person, which I’m pretty sure a PR rep wouldn’t do, but nobody from the Baldoni team was up for that lol. Then you guys started asking for all sorts of personal info and wanted Lively supporters to post under logins. Wut? No. I owe you nothing.

I’m a pro Lively DMV area lawyer who has been right about a lot more than any of the Baldoni people have. I’m not a shill and I’m not being paid by anyone. Sorry if I can’t take it too seriously when I’m lectured on this by a supporter of the creepy dude who hired Amber Heard’s crisis PR team.

By ‘neutral’ I meant not paid. You’re obviously pro lively and will twist and turn any facts to get there.

If you’d like to meet, why don’t you take a first step and just start posting under a screen name here? Can still be anonymous. No one asked you for ‘all sorts of personal info’ in any real way. People are just tired of how obvious your PR push is and want you to stop droning on with nonsense.

As far as you being a lawyer, who knows? Who cares? I’m sure failed lawyers can become low level PR shills too. As many people on here have noted, for all your hours and hours just ‘randomly’ reading and listening to court documents and arguments, your analytical skills are not great, and you often write like an unintelligent and mean teen girl with your ‘lols’ of yourself and ‘sorry not sorry’ style.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also noting that some previously pro-Baldoni posters on that sub have definitely turned somewhat, and are now at least anti-Freedman and arguing that Garofalo should take over/be more involved. That seems to be real and not any kind of purchased advocacy. They still support Baldoni.

"some previously pro-Baldoni posters" and it's literally one crazy person named after an automobile, you absolute liar.

Anonymous wrote:I can criticize Freedman here or there without being anti-Freedman. On the whole, he's done a fantastic job saving Baldoni's reputation. Blake, on the other hand, while successful getting rid of damages claims against her, continues to do worse on the pr front.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.

I’m not a neutral poster, I’ve been saying I’m pro-Lively here for quite some time. Really, in anti-Freedman, but whatevs. I even offered to meet people in person, which I’m pretty sure a PR rep wouldn’t do, but nobody from the Baldoni team was up for that lol. Then you guys started asking for all sorts of personal info and wanted Lively supporters to post under logins. Wut? No. I owe you nothing.

I’m a pro Lively DMV area lawyer who has been right about a lot more than any of the Baldoni people have. I’m not a shill and I’m not being paid by anyone. Sorry if I can’t take it too seriously when I’m lectured on this by a supporter of the creepy dude who hired Amber Heard’s crisis PR team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.

Agree, either absolutely nothing to do in her real life, or (hopefully) paid, because that makes it less pathetic.

But of course, the Baldoni supporters who comment on every post they make, are cool people with lives.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.

Agree, either absolutely nothing to do in her real life, or (hopefully) paid, because that makes it less pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.

I’m not a neutral poster, I’ve been saying I’m pro-Lively here for quite some time. Really, in anti-Freedman, but whatevs. I even offered to meet people in person, which I’m pretty sure a PR rep wouldn’t do, but nobody from the Baldoni team was up for that lol. Then you guys started asking for all sorts of personal info and wanted Lively supporters to post under logins. Wut? No. I owe you nothing.

I’m a pro Lively DMV area lawyer who has been right about a lot more than any of the Baldoni people have. I’m not a shill and I’m not being paid by anyone. Sorry if I can’t take it too seriously when I’m lectured on this by a supporter of the creepy dude who hired Amber Heard’s crisis PR team.

Anonymous wrote:Also noting that some previously pro-Baldoni posters on that sub have definitely turned somewhat, and are now at least anti-Freedman and arguing that Garofalo should take over/be more involved. That seems to be real and not any kind of purchased advocacy. They still support Baldoni.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.