Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For long-timers, how do you think the new change in regime (Trump) will affect BVA? Remote work?
From prior experience, we are going to get a new VA Secretary. And he/she will appoint a new Board Chairman.
Personally, I think the current secretary and chairman are awful. (And I mean AWFUL). But then again, the devil you know.
As our standards are set for the year, nothing will happen with that. I don't think admin can change it after its agreed upon.
As to remote work, seeing as we have no offices (basically, 2 floors now), ain't no way to bring 1700+ people to DC. Remote work has been with the Board for years, it's not a Covid thing like many other agencies. I think that is safe (fingers crossed). I would waste so much money and time otherwise. As to Judges, I could foresee them being required to have presence as opposed to attorneys being present. But, that's just a random thought.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For long-timers, how do you think the new change in regime (Trump) will affect BVA? Remote work?
From prior experience, we are going to get a new VA Secretary. And he/she will appoint a new Board Chairman.
Personally, I think the current secretary and chairman are awful. (And I mean AWFUL). But then again, the devil you know.
As our standards are set for the year, nothing will happen with that. I don't think admin can change it after its agreed upon.
As to remote work, seeing as we have no offices (basically, 2 floors now), ain't no way to bring 1700+ people to DC. Remote work has been with the Board for years, it's not a Covid thing like many other agencies. I think that is safe (fingers crossed). I would waste so much money and time otherwise. As to Judges, I could foresee them being required to have presence as opposed to attorneys being present. But, that's just a random thought.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For long-timers, how do you think the new change in regime (Trump) will affect BVA? Remote work?
From prior experience, we are going to get a new VA Secretary. And he/she will appoint a new Board Chairman.
Personally, I think the current secretary and chairman are awful. (And I mean AWFUL). But then again, the devil you know.
As our standards are set for the year, nothing will happen with that. I don't think admin can change it after its agreed upon.
As to remote work, seeing as we have no offices (basically, 2 floors now), ain't no way to bring 1700+ people to DC. Remote work has been with the Board for years, it's not a Covid thing like many other agencies. I think that is safe (fingers crossed). I would waste so much money and time otherwise. As to Judges, I could foresee them being required to have presence as opposed to attorneys being present. But, that's just a random thought.
Anonymous wrote:For long-timers, how do you think the new change in regime (Trump) will affect BVA? Remote work?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone know/hear anything about if they’re continuing the quarterly incentive program?
To the best of my understanding, all incentive and overtime is on hold until Congress passes a budget. These continuing resolutions put agencies, such as VA, in a holding pattern. So, we expect the worst.
Weren’t incentives like the quarterly bonus program and overtime available last year when there was a CR?
I think so. But this year, being an election year, we are all preparing for the worst if republicans win control.
What is the definition of the worst? Quartely incentive awards were a new invention in the last year. I would not be surprised if that goes away because quaertely incentives weree never a thing at the Board until last year.
Overtime has always been limited during periods of continuing resolution. The Board has never experienced a significant shutdown during my time there under both Democrats and Republicans. The last time the government shut down several years ago the VA continued operations. I remember one time in 2014 or 2015 when we had to attend an all staff meeting about a potential shutdown but no shutdown occurred.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone know/hear anything about if they’re continuing the quarterly incentive program?
To the best of my understanding, all incentive and overtime is on hold until Congress passes a budget. These continuing resolutions put agencies, such as VA, in a holding pattern. So, we expect the worst.
Weren’t incentives like the quarterly bonus program and overtime available last year when there was a CR?
I think so. But this year, being an election year, we are all preparing for the worst if republicans win control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone know/hear anything about if they’re continuing the quarterly incentive program?
To the best of my understanding, all incentive and overtime is on hold until Congress passes a budget. These continuing resolutions put agencies, such as VA, in a holding pattern. So, we expect the worst.
Weren’t incentives like the quarterly bonus program and overtime available last year when there was a CR?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone know/hear anything about if they’re continuing the quarterly incentive program?
To the best of my understanding, all incentive and overtime is on hold until Congress passes a budget. These continuing resolutions put agencies, such as VA, in a holding pattern. So, we expect the worst.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone know/hear anything about if they’re continuing the quarterly incentive program?
Anonymous wrote:Hey all. I’m a new attorney (GS-11) and I work with some non-supervisory GS-14s who have been at the Board for years. I am realizing that the Board screwed AAs over a few years ago by downgrading the GS track to top out at GS-13. What are my options at the Board to get to a GS-14 level? If I top out at GS-13, how will my caseload differ from a GS-14s? Will I just be doing the same level of work for less pay because I didn’t get grandfathered in to the older track? By work, I mean case difficulty . I understand that 3/week is the standard for production right now.
Any for anylne interested in starting at the Board in the future, I like it a lot so far. The work requires you to be self-motivated, detail-oriented, adaptable, and open to critique, so I can see how it isn’t for everyone.
Anonymous wrote:Hey all. I’m a new attorney (GS-11) and I work with some non-supervisory GS-14s who have been at the Board for years. I am realizing that the Board screwed AAs over a few years ago by downgrading the GS track to top out at GS-13. What are my options at the Board to get to a GS-14 level? If I top out at GS-13, how will my caseload differ from a GS-14s? Will I just be doing the same level of work for less pay because I didn’t get grandfathered in to the older track? By work, I mean case difficulty . I understand that 3/week is the standard for production right now.
Any for anylne interested in starting at the Board in the future, I like it a lot so far. The work requires you to be self-motivated, detail-oriented, adaptable, and open to critique, so I can see how it isn’t for everyone.
Anonymous wrote:Hey all. I’m a new attorney (GS-11) and I work with some non-supervisory GS-14s who have been at the Board for years. I am realizing that the Board screwed AAs over a few years ago by downgrading the GS track to top out at GS-13. What are my options at the Board to get to a GS-14 level? If I top out at GS-13, how will my caseload differ from a GS-14s? Will I just be doing the same level of work for less pay because I didn’t get grandfathered in to the older track? By work, I mean case difficulty . I understand that 3/week is the standard for production right now.
Any for anylne interested in starting at the Board in the future, I like it a lot so far. The work requires you to be self-motivated, detail-oriented, adaptable, and open to critique, so I can see how it isn’t for everyone.