Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So complicated and so much coddling. Everything Reid does is half-assed so why should this be any exception.
This. Instead of solving problems, they are creating them.
I think they will vote to adopt county-wide changes in January but postpone the effective date for any changes for the five pyramids potentially affected by Western. Then they'll deal with Westfield, South Lakes, Chantilly, Oakton, and Centreville boundaries in mid-2026. Meanwhile they'll move forward with their convoluted opt-in scheme to Western. No one knows how many kids Western will have for its first few years, which undercuts the argument that the overcrowding is acute and requires immediate action.
Anonymous wrote:So complicated and so much coddling. Everything Reid does is half-assed so why should this be any exception.
This. Instead of solving problems, they are creating them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The opt out option makes sense to me. People who are worried about programs being available at the school the day that it opens will have the choice to stay at their current school. This allows people worried about sports or the arts and option. If they chose their current school, they stay there for four years.
If kids opt in to the school, they will be allowed to play a sport at their base school if it is not available at the new school. Once the sport becomes available at the new school, they will have to play at the new school. I don't see many people taking advantage of this. Maybe SLHS families who want AP, so they want to attend the new school but play sports at SLHS because the sport is not available at the new school. By Junior year, the sport might be available at the new school, and they might have to switch schools. Just an example that makes sense to me.
If kids opt in to the school and don't care as much about sports and the like then no worries.
Three years from now, there is no opt in option. Sixth graders will have to attend the new school. They can try and pupil place if they want to attend a different school, but parents provide transportation.
The only thing that makes no sense to me is the lack of boundaries by January. This push to wait until June is ridiculous.
I thought that in 3 years there is still an opt in option, not no opt out. So if you’re in 6th grade now, and your home is in one of the 5 pyramids but doesn’t end up in boundary, you could choose to opt in (presumably with no transportation). But if you’re a 6th grader whose home is in boundary you can’t opt out.
This is based on that slide with the schools and arrows. Did they say something different last night?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The opt out option makes sense to me. People who are worried about programs being available at the school the day that it opens will have the choice to stay at their current school. This allows people worried about sports or the arts and option. If they chose their current school, they stay there for four years.
If kids opt in to the school, they will be allowed to play a sport at their base school if it is not available at the new school. Once the sport becomes available at the new school, they will have to play at the new school. I don't see many people taking advantage of this. Maybe SLHS families who want AP, so they want to attend the new school but play sports at SLHS because the sport is not available at the new school. By Junior year, the sport might be available at the new school, and they might have to switch schools. Just an example that makes sense to me.
If kids opt in to the school and don't care as much about sports and the like then no worries.
Three years from now, there is no opt in option. Sixth graders will have to attend the new school. They can try and pupil place if they want to attend a different school, but parents provide transportation.
The only thing that makes no sense to me is the lack of boundaries by January. This push to wait until June is ridiculous.
I thought that in 3 years there is still an opt in option, but no opt out. So if you’re in 6th grade now, and your home is in one of the 5 pyramids but doesn’t end up in boundary, you could choose to opt in (presumably with no transportation). But if you’re a 6th grader whose home is in boundary you can’t opt out.
This is based on that slide with the schools and arrows. Did they say something different last night?
Anonymous wrote:The opt out option makes sense to me. People who are worried about programs being available at the school the day that it opens will have the choice to stay at their current school. This allows people worried about sports or the arts and option. If they chose their current school, they stay there for four years.
If kids opt in to the school, they will be allowed to play a sport at their base school if it is not available at the new school. Once the sport becomes available at the new school, they will have to play at the new school. I don't see many people taking advantage of this. Maybe SLHS families who want AP, so they want to attend the new school but play sports at SLHS because the sport is not available at the new school. By Junior year, the sport might be available at the new school, and they might have to switch schools. Just an example that makes sense to me.
If kids opt in to the school and don't care as much about sports and the like then no worries.
Three years from now, there is no opt in option. Sixth graders will have to attend the new school. They can try and pupil place if they want to attend a different school, but parents provide transportation.
The only thing that makes no sense to me is the lack of boundaries by January. This push to wait until June is ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The opt out option makes sense to me. People who are worried about programs being available at the school the day that it opens will have the choice to stay at their current school. This allows people worried about sports or the arts and option. If they chose their current school, they stay there for four years.
If kids opt in to the school, they will be allowed to play a sport at their base school if it is not available at the new school. Once the sport becomes available at the new school, they will have to play at the new school. I don't see many people taking advantage of this. Maybe SLHS families who want AP, so they want to attend the new school but play sports at SLHS because the sport is not available at the new school. By Junior year, the sport might be available at the new school, and they might have to switch schools. Just an example that makes sense to me.
If kids opt in to the school and don't care as much about sports and the like then no worries.
Three years from now, there is no opt in option. Sixth graders will have to attend the new school. They can try and pupil place if they want to attend a different school, but parents provide transportation.
The only thing that makes no sense to me is the lack of boundaries by January. This push to wait until June is ridiculous.
So complicated and so much coddling. Everything Reid does is half-assed so why should this be any exception.
Anonymous wrote:...
The only thing that makes no sense to me is the lack of boundaries by January. This push to wait until June is ridiculous.
So complicated and so much coddling. Everything Reid does is half-assed so why should this be any exception.
Anonymous wrote:The opt out option makes sense to me. People who are worried about programs being available at the school the day that it opens will have the choice to stay at their current school. This allows people worried about sports or the arts and option. If they chose their current school, they stay there for four years.
If kids opt in to the school, they will be allowed to play a sport at their base school if it is not available at the new school. Once the sport becomes available at the new school, they will have to play at the new school. I don't see many people taking advantage of this. Maybe SLHS families who want AP, so they want to attend the new school but play sports at SLHS because the sport is not available at the new school. By Junior year, the sport might be available at the new school, and they might have to switch schools. Just an example that makes sense to me.
If kids opt in to the school and don't care as much about sports and the like then no worries.
Three years from now, there is no opt in option. Sixth graders will have to attend the new school. They can try and pupil place if they want to attend a different school, but parents provide transportation.
The only thing that makes no sense to me is the lack of boundaries by January. This push to wait until June is ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Moon did get clarification that if you opt out for a sport that you will be allowed to continue to go to and play that sport at your chosen school, even if your home later becomes in boundary at the new school. However, if you decide to go to the new school you would have to play your sport there once it is offered.
It seems like anyone who opts out the first year will be allowed to opt out for all 4 years, even if their home becomes part of the boundary for the new school in the future.
This doesn't even make sense. What if they opt out for a spring sport and don't make the team. Too many what ifs and loop holes. This is a shit show. She's also throwing in plans for the the school within a school with AI and aviation tracks
Anonymous wrote:Moon did get clarification that if you opt out for a sport that you will be allowed to continue to go to and play that sport at your chosen school, even if your home later becomes in boundary at the new school. However, if you decide to go to the new school you would have to play your sport there once it is offered.
It seems like anyone who opts out the first year will be allowed to opt out for all 4 years, even if their home becomes part of the boundary for the new school in the future.