Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clubs mean much more on the recruiting circuit for you kid to get noticed. However, College coaches do like the fact a kid goes to private school. Parents are already use to paying a tuition. And are more than likely able to pay going forward.

That is the most ridiculous, pretentious and privileged comment I have seen in awhile. You obviously have no clue how anything works. I agree about the club lacrosse helping tremendously with recruiting. But everything else you said is so wrong, and adds to the stigma of those that go to private schools, are just self indulged, isolated, and stuck up.

It had to be said.

Yeah but it is still true and the numbers don’t lie.

What? It is not true at all. "College coaches like the fact that parent are already use to paying tuition, and that makes them more likely to be able to pay going forward". That is ridiculous. I wouldn't want my kids going to school with anyone that thinks that way.

10% of American HS students attend a private HS. Look at any lacrosse roster. Probably 75-80% private schools.

That has nothing to do with whether or not a college coach thinks a recruited player can pay for tuition or not. I hope this is just a misinformed high school student posting..

He's not misinformed. College rosters are anywhere from 45-55 players. After the first 20, the player better have excellent grades and the family the ability to pay the tuition. Our stellar public school system is less likely to produce a player with both excellent grades and the ability to pay. College coaches save a lot of time by taking the path of least resistance.

Keep justifying to yourself why you spend 40k a year to send your kid to a private school. You are so wrong it actually worries me that all private school parents think this way. Go ahead a look at those rosters. I think you would be surprised with how many public school kids on on there. And for the record, our public school system is the best in the world. Those teachers and coaches do something you would never be able to do.

If your paying 40k or more for private HS your kid simply isn’t good enough. Plenty of players are going to privates on lax money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get back to Schedules and Commentary please please!

Scrimmages coming up soon.

Friday, Feb 23
Landon at McDonogh

Sat Feb 24
Bullis at Severn
PVI at Prep

Tue Feb 27
Bullis vs PVI

Thanks for sharing this.

Has anyone seen a Prep schedule posted online?

Fri Mar 1
Bullis vs McDonogh
PVI vs Madison (VA Public)
Landon vs Boys Latin

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clubs mean much more on the recruiting circuit for you kid to get noticed. However, College coaches do like the fact a kid goes to private school. Parents are already use to paying a tuition. And are more than likely able to pay going forward.

That is the most ridiculous, pretentious and privileged comment I have seen in awhile. You obviously have no clue how anything works. I agree about the club lacrosse helping tremendously with recruiting. But everything else you said is so wrong, and adds to the stigma of those that go to private schools, are just self indulged, isolated, and stuck up.

It had to be said.

Yeah but it is still true and the numbers don’t lie.

What? It is not true at all. "College coaches like the fact that parent are already use to paying tuition, and that makes them more likely to be able to pay going forward". That is ridiculous. I wouldn't want my kids going to school with anyone that thinks that way.

10% of American HS students attend a private HS. Look at any lacrosse roster. Probably 75-80% private schools.

That has nothing to do with whether or not a college coach thinks a recruited player can pay for tuition or not. I hope this is just a misinformed high school student posting..

He's not misinformed. College rosters are anywhere from 45-55 players. After the first 20, the player better have excellent grades and the family the ability to pay the tuition. Our stellar public school system is less likely to produce a player with both excellent grades and the ability to pay. College coaches save a lot of time by taking the path of least resistance.

Keep justifying to yourself why you spend 40k a year to send your kid to a private school. You are so wrong it actually worries me that all private school parents think this way. Go ahead a look at those rosters. I think you would be surprised with how many public school kids on on there. And for the record, our public school system is the best in the world. Those teachers and coaches do something you would never be able to do.

Anonymous wrote:Public vs Private.

DMV --Private schools produce the most talent at the college level.
Baltimore--Private schools rule
NY--Publics play at a higher level (Except St Anthony's & Chaminade)
Philly--Privates lead the way
New England--Private boarding schools are king
Texas/California, Northwest is a mix.

There are over 350 schools that play D1, 2, & 3 lacrosse--that is at least 14,000 players.
The NY and CT public school systems fill a large % of lacrosse players.

As a parent decide what works for you.

Time to move on to the season.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clubs mean much more on the recruiting circuit for you kid to get noticed. However, College coaches do like the fact a kid goes to private school. Parents are already use to paying a tuition. And are more than likely able to pay going forward.

That is the most ridiculous, pretentious and privileged comment I have seen in awhile. You obviously have no clue how anything works. I agree about the club lacrosse helping tremendously with recruiting. But everything else you said is so wrong, and adds to the stigma of those that go to private schools, are just self indulged, isolated, and stuck up.

It had to be said.

Yeah but it is still true and the numbers don’t lie.

What? It is not true at all. "College coaches like the fact that parent are already use to paying tuition, and that makes them more likely to be able to pay going forward". That is ridiculous. I wouldn't want my kids going to school with anyone that thinks that way.

10% of American HS students attend a private HS. Look at any lacrosse roster. Probably 75-80% private schools.

That has nothing to do with whether or not a college coach thinks a recruited player can pay for tuition or not. I hope this is just a misinformed high school student posting..

He's not misinformed. College rosters are anywhere from 45-55 players. After the first 20, the player better have excellent grades and the family the ability to pay the tuition. Our stellar public school system is less likely to produce a player with both excellent grades and the ability to pay. College coaches save a lot of time by taking the path of least resistance.

Keep justifying to yourself why you spend 40k a year to send your kid to a private school. You are so wrong it actually worries me that all private school parents think this way. Go ahead a look at those rosters. I think you would be surprised with how many public school kids on on there. And for the record, our public school system is the best in the world. Those teachers and coaches do something you would never be able to do.

Anonymous wrote:Get back to Schedules and Commentary please please!

Scrimmages coming up soon.

Friday, Feb 23
Landon at McDonogh

Sat Feb 24
Bullis at Severn
PVI at Prep

Tue Feb 27
Bullis vs PVI

Thanks for sharing this.

Has anyone seen a Prep schedule posted online?

Fri Mar 1
Bullis vs McDonogh
PVI vs Madison (VA Public)
Landon vs Boys Latin

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got a few more to add for your information…
Luke Rhoa-Syracuse Maddie played freshman year
Riley Fig- Syracuse starter defenseman
Mac Haley- Navy starting attack
Gavin Kelly- Drexel

Add

Blake Boyd - Starting DM at AF
Trujillo - #2 DM at Syracuse
Whitty - Starting attack at the Mount

Also some very strong 2023 players on that 2022 team that will have impact this season.

I believe Fyock will get his first start this week at Ohio State.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got a few more to add for your information…
Luke Rhoa-Syracuse Maddie played freshman year
Riley Fig- Syracuse starter defenseman
Mac Haley- Navy starting attack
Gavin Kelly- Drexel

Add

Blake Boyd - Starting DM at AF
Trujillo - #2 DM at Syracuse
Whitty - Starting attack at the Mount

Also some very strong 2023 players on that 2022 team that will have impact this season.