Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
06/27/2023 11:18
Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The leaking of the tape is prosecutor misconduct.
What’s your evidence that the leak came from the prosecutor?
DP.
So now we’re going to have people hyperventilating about a leak instead of the tape…again. When it turns out TFG leaked it himself, no one will remember. Tale as old as time.
The leaker is unimportant. Unless he’s going to claim it’s a fake tape, it’s evidence of his willful retention of classified documents. How he escapes conviction is beyond me. Seems like they are trying to muddy the waters on this by having everyone focus on leaks and the substance of the conversation.
+1
This is how the whole administration ran between 2017-2021 and how authoritarians control the drip drip drip to desensitize the public to just how horrible they are.
+2
Anyone still whining about “the leaks,” ignoring the substance and then when it’s revealed that the leaker is probably Trump himself is not a good person.
Anonymous
06/27/2023 11:05
Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous
06/27/2023 10:54
Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else amused at the Olympic level projection, with the staffer accusing Hillary Clinton of always printing these documents out as they are shuffling through the top secret documents that they have printed out (and stolen and massively mishandled).
Always Be Whatabouting.
Anonymous
06/27/2023 09:03
Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The leaking of the tape is prosecutor misconduct.
What’s your evidence that the leak came from the prosecutor?
DP.
So now we’re going to have people hyperventilating about a leak instead of the tape…again. When it turns out TFG leaked it himself, no one will remember. Tale as old as time.
The leaker is unimportant. Unless he’s going to claim it’s a fake tape, it’s evidence of his willful retention of classified documents. How he escapes conviction is beyond me. Seems like they are trying to muddy the waters on this by having everyone focus on leaks and the substance of the conversation.
+1
This is how the whole administration ran between 2017-2021 and how authoritarians control the drip drip drip to desensitize the public to just how horrible they are.
Anonymous
06/27/2023 09:01
Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:The leaking of the tape is prosecutor misconduct.
The prosecutors likely are not the source here. It is Trump who wants to make it so there are no jurors possible to hear his case.
Anonymous
06/27/2023 08:41
Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The leaking of the tape is prosecutor misconduct.
What’s your evidence that the leak came from the prosecutor?
DP.
So now we’re going to have people hyperventilating about a leak instead of the tape…again. When it turns out TFG leaked it himself, no one will remember. Tale as old as time.
The leaker is unimportant. Unless he’s going to claim it’s a fake tape, it’s evidence of his willful retention of classified documents. How he escapes conviction is beyond me. Seems like they are trying to muddy the waters on this by having everyone focus on leaks and the substance of the conversation.
Anonymous
06/27/2023 08:36
Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else amused at the Olympic level projection, with the staffer accusing Hillary Clinton of always printing these documents out as they are shuffling through the top secret documents that they have printed out (and stolen and massively mishandled).
Cartoon villains.
Anonymous
06/27/2023 08:32
Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:The leaking of the tape is prosecutor misconduct.
What’s your evidence that the leak came from the prosecutor?
Anonymous
06/27/2023 08:02
Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:
Why is the prosecution asking for this delay for the defense? Shouldn't the defense be asking for the delay, since they are the ones who need it to acquire the clearance necessary to review the classified documents?
Because the prosecution has to hand over documents and they (the DoJ) are also the ones responsible for getting defense counsel cleared. Would you prefer the judge keep to the schedule and then the case get tossed when the prosecution can't give the defense files that it is constitutionally required to provide?
Anonymous
06/27/2023 07:59
Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anyone else amused at the Olympic level projection, with the staffer accusing Hillary Clinton of always printing these documents out as they are shuffling through the top secret documents that they have printed out (and stolen and massively mishandled).
Anonymous
06/27/2023 07:51
Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Why is the prosecution asking for this delay for the defense? Shouldn't the defense be asking for the delay, since they are the ones who need it to acquire the clearance necessary to review the classified documents?
Anonymous
06/27/2023 07:44
Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:The leaking of the tape is prosecutor misconduct.
That is pentagon papers level gold. The country deserves to hear that.
Anonymous
06/27/2023 07:27
Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
The leaking of the tape is prosecutor misconduct.