Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GZ @ SJC. This Thursday at 4PM. Hopefully SJC streams game.
They posted 2 parents per player. You think the Gonzaga mob will show up to another school and violate Covid rules?
Anonymous wrote:GZ @ SJC. This Thursday at 4PM. Hopefully SJC streams game.
Anonymous wrote:seems odd to me that some parents are willing to pay 5 years of HS ball to chase a $10 - 20K (at max) scholarship to play D1 lacrosse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bullis handled Episcopal once they figured out the zone. It was 7-7 in 3rd but the wheels came off for 14-8 final. Funny listening to Corrigan gush about 33 and 7 on Episcopal as sophomores. My 22 played against both of them for years, including his Freshman year in 2019 when 33 was at Landon and 7 was at SSSAS. Is there an 8 semester rule in the IAC? No way those kids can play their "Senior" year at Episcopal. 7 had a nice game whether you consider him a 22 or 23.
Don't be a jack*** lax dad throwing shade on individual players - no one cares about this history and it is inappropriate.
Re: the game itself, pretty entertaining and competitive into the fourth quarter. Hello, if you give players time and room to set their feet they will beat a zone. Episcopal had problems clearing all day, but they do have more talent than I thought before tuning in for the game - everyone of their goals was legit. Bullis played very physical and was more athletic in space and their goalie stole 2-3 goals.
I just think it’s funny. Corrigan going nuts about 7 being such as savvy player as a sophomore when it’s his 3rd year of HS. I don’t care otherwise. He’s a good player either way. Holding back to pay $50k for a non full ride sport is funny. ROI on that is terrible. At least the 19 year olds playing WCAC hoops and football get full rides. But it’s a free country. Episcopal still sucks, no d at all. I’d take Riverside.
Anonymous wrote:Don’t think Episcopal cares. They have a D pole who use to be a 20’ and played his freshman year at a Loudoun County school. This would obviously be his 5th year since entering HS. Not sure how the IAC lets that fly
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stiil don’t believe PVI wins 4 out of 10 against GZ.
Neutral observer here: PVI athletically was bigger, faster and stronger than GZ in the live stream I watched a few weeks ago.
I have never thought PVI was well coached so YES I do think GZ would win a few games ver them.
I was at game. PVI did seem bigger and more athletic. But the SJC defense was on point. I know the SJC middies get a lot of love but the attack is who dominated. The freshman who will be a college placekicker is really good. 1 and 9 were forcing it a little bit. SJC looks like they can beat anyone when they are executing but they seem vulnerable on an off day as they seem a little small. Last year Landon almost got them because they couldn't stop the big lefty and it's the same crew of poles.
Not the same close poles and the best one was covering Harvard commit. Landon will have to find another way to score if they play this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares about goal advantage? All these moms whining about hwo their sons will have to face in the tournament.
Prep is the most talented team. They will cruise to the finals and then choke against Bullis.
Didn't Bullis lose at home on Senior Night to St. Stephen's? That is the definition of choke....and frankly embarrassing after all the self promotion of the Senior Class - 6 "pre-season All Americans" The leading scorer is a Junior transfer. Give me a break!
Anonymous wrote:Who cares about goal advantage? All these moms whining about hwo their sons will have to face in the tournament.
Prep is the most talented team. They will cruise to the finals and then choke against Bullis.
Anonymous wrote:seriously is the GZ - SJC game back on for this week?
I could care less if GZ is playing Riverside tomorrow (Gonzaga will win and shut up the public vs private debate)
In all seriousness if the GZ - SJC is not rescheduled, that is an all time low for Casey Oneil
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stiil don’t believe PVI wins 4 out of 10 against GZ.
Neutral observer here: PVI athletically was bigger, faster and stronger than GZ in the live stream I watched a few weeks ago.
I have never thought PVI was well coached so YES I do think GZ would win a few games ver them.
I was at game. PVI did seem bigger and more athletic. But the SJC defense was on point. I know the SJC middies get a lot of love but the attack is who dominated. The freshman who will be a college placekicker is really good. 1 and 9 were forcing it a little bit. SJC looks like they can beat anyone when they are executing but they seem vulnerable on an off day as they seem a little small. Last year Landon almost got them because they couldn't stop the big lefty and it's the same crew of poles.