Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speculation here but money wasn’t the motive, it’s just a distraction. Odds are she’s no longer alive.
If you believe money wasn’t the motive then you basically are saying it’s the family. Otherwise the only other motive is money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not if she was dismembered or acid was used to degrade the body. Terrible I know. Whoever did this needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
OK thank you sadly that makes more sense.
That makes more sense? On what planet?
It makes more sense that she would’ve been dismembered instead of them, throwing a fat 84-year-old into a small drywell.
Why do you keep posting she’s fat? 5’5" and 150 is not that big b
I suspect she was heavier than that.
Based on?
I’m not the person you are responding to, but I tend to agree that she looks heavier than 150lbs (which I don’t think is “fat” for someone her age either, by the way). Her weight is only relevant in the context of how difficult it might be to carry her, or where her body (god forbid) could potentially fit.
I think she was heavier in earlier photos and lighter and frailer in more recent ones. That’s not surprising at her age.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speculation here but money wasn’t the motive, it’s just a distraction. Odds are she’s no longer alive.
If you believe money wasn’t the motive then you basically are saying it’s the family. Otherwise the only other motive is money.
It’s also possible the perpetrator acted due to mental illness, a grievance, an obsession, or factors we don’t understand yet.
Or someone is after Savannah. I’m starting to think that’s it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not if she was dismembered or acid was used to degrade the body. Terrible I know. Whoever did this needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
OK thank you sadly that makes more sense.
That makes more sense? On what planet?
It makes more sense that she would’ve been dismembered instead of them, throwing a fat 84-year-old into a small drywell.
Why do you keep posting she’s fat? 5’5" and 150 is not that big b
I suspect she was heavier than that.
Based on?
I’m not the person you are responding to, but I tend to agree that she looks heavier than 150lbs (which I don’t think is “fat” for someone her age either, by the way). Her weight is only relevant in the context of how difficult it might be to carry her, or where her body (god forbid) could potentially fit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not if she was dismembered or acid was used to degrade the body. Terrible I know. Whoever did this needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
OK thank you sadly that makes more sense.
That makes more sense? On what planet?
It makes more sense that she would’ve been dismembered instead of them, throwing a fat 84-year-old into a small drywell.
Why do you keep posting she’s fat? 5’5" and 150 is not that big b
I suspect she was heavier than that.
Based on?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not if she was dismembered or acid was used to degrade the body. Terrible I know. Whoever did this needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
OK thank you sadly that makes more sense.
That makes more sense? On what planet?
It makes more sense that she would’ve been dismembered instead of them, throwing a fat 84-year-old into a small drywell.
Why do you keep posting she’s fat? 5’5" and 150 is not that big b
I suspect she was heavier than that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not if she was dismembered or acid was used to degrade the body. Terrible I know. Whoever did this needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
OK thank you sadly that makes more sense.
That makes more sense? On what planet?
It makes more sense that she would’ve been dismembered instead of them, throwing a fat 84-year-old into a small drywell.
Why do you keep posting she’s fat? 5’5" and 150 is not that big b
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not if she was dismembered or acid was used to degrade the body. Terrible I know. Whoever did this needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
OK thank you sadly that makes more sense.
That makes more sense? On what planet?
It makes more sense that she would’ve been dismembered instead of them, throwing a fat 84-year-old into a small drywell.
Why do you keep posting she’s fat? 5’5" and 150 is not that big b
Because DCUM hates any woman that isn't the perfect weight.
I think a lot of DCUM posters are younger and unrealistic about the physical and cognitive efffects of aging.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not if she was dismembered or acid was used to degrade the body. Terrible I know. Whoever did this needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
OK thank you sadly that makes more sense.
That makes more sense? On what planet?
It makes more sense that she would’ve been dismembered instead of them, throwing a fat 84-year-old into a small drywell.
Why do you keep posting she’s fat? 5’5" and 150 is not that big b
Because DCUM hates any woman that isn't the perfect weight.
I think a lot of DCUM posters are younger and unrealistic about the physical and cognitive efffects of aging.
What does that have to do with this? No one said she should be slimmer. The discussion is about how hard it would be to fit a 150lb woman down a small drywell. She's not a tiny 100lb skin and bones elderly person.
Anonymous wrote:Weird. What Trump said didn't come to fruition. Just wanted to be part of it. SMH.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not if she was dismembered or acid was used to degrade the body. Terrible I know. Whoever did this needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
OK thank you sadly that makes more sense.
That makes more sense? On what planet?
It makes more sense that she would’ve been dismembered instead of them, throwing a fat 84-year-old into a small drywell.
Why do you keep posting she’s fat? 5’5" and 150 is not that big b
Because DCUM hates any woman that isn't the perfect weight.
I think a lot of DCUM posters are younger and unrealistic about the physical and cognitive efffects of aging.
What does that have to do with this? No one said she should be slimmer. The discussion is about how hard it would be to fit a 150lb woman down a small drywell. She's not a tiny 100lb skin and bones elderly person.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not if she was dismembered or acid was used to degrade the body. Terrible I know. Whoever did this needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law
OK thank you sadly that makes more sense.
That makes more sense? On what planet?
It makes more sense that she would’ve been dismembered instead of them, throwing a fat 84-year-old into a small drywell.
Why do you keep posting she’s fat? 5’5" and 150 is not that big b
Because DCUM hates any woman that isn't the perfect weight.
I think a lot of DCUM posters are younger and unrealistic about the physical and cognitive efffects of aging.