Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."
- Rush

I will only vote for RFK, Jr. if he makes it. If not, I will write in his name.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The SEC voters won’t be impressed.

By "SEC voters" do you mean conservative White men? Because plenty of voters in SEC states will be impressed.

Citation?

Video of Kamala Harris' rally in Atlanta.

You think Walz is going to have appeal throughout the US?

Absolutely. I myself am a Midwestern dad and that personality plays everywhere.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird how magas keep posting shit from Joey Mannarino, the guy who got caught pretending to be a black woman on Twitter because he was too stupid to switch accounts.

This is who you have telling you what to think?

lol-is that who he is? That guy is dumb as rocks. If that’s the conservative thought leader, the GOP is in even more trouble than I thought

Well, he's no Ben Shapiro

Have you ever listened to Ben Shapiro? You may not like what he has to say, but he’s very bright. And quite sharp.

He's a dumb person's idea of a smart person. Also, he looks funny. Head down, constantly bobbing.

I think Harvard Law probably disagrees with you. As would UCLA and Phi Beta Kappa. Where did you go to school?

Like Walz, I went to a state college. I'm all for a good education, but book learning isn't everything.

NP. It's always funny to see the party that decries elitism constantly fall back in Ivy credentials, like Harvard has never produced a dumb person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz looks like obese Chris Farley in the “van down by the river skit”.

The left has been negging Trump for his weight but think Walz is charming.

he's skinnier than Trump.

Walz hovers around 250. Trump through the second half of his term in office up until around that 2022 photo was hovering around 300.

It's pretty clear that in 2024, he's probably been on one of the semaglutides (Ozempic, Wegovy, Zepbound, etc). Look at the sagginess in the face and the double chin. Probably handlers thought he would do better if he lost weight. Since there was a lot or argument about fitness between Trump and Biden. Looks like he's lost about 40ish lbs, so they're probably close in weight now, with Trump still slightly heavier.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Fake news...

Uh, there was video. Line was 6 blocks long this morning. The arena is totally packed.

This. And Shapiro is giving an awesome speech. For all you “homeless independents” - you should listen for yourselves to the “extreme” ideas he’s touting. They’re quite uplifting and optimistic. Much better than downer Debby Trump/Vance.

He is. He's got a very Obama way of delivering his address.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there was any question about the far left controlling a Kamala Harris White House, she just erased any doubt with this choice.

There is no doubt she will be controlled by the far left.

This. Feeling politically homeless right now. I can’t bring myself to vote for either extreme so will probably sit this one out.

I don't believe you are what you say you are. But, even if you view this as a "lesser evil" situation (it's not, Harris/Walz is a good option); but even if you viewed it as a "lesser evil" situation, the moral thing to do is to vote in a way that helps protect your friends and neighbors from the greater evil.

Anonymous wrote:Live Rally:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird how magas keep posting shit from Joey Mannarino, the guy who got caught pretending to be a black woman on Twitter because he was too stupid to switch accounts.

This is who you have telling you what to think?

lol-is that who he is? That guy is dumb as rocks. If that’s the conservative thought leader, the GOP is in even more trouble than I thought

Well, he's no Ben Shapiro

Have you ever listened to Ben Shapiro? You may not like what he has to say, but he’s very bright. And quite sharp.

He's a dumb person's idea of a smart person. Also, he looks funny. Head down, constantly bobbing.

I think Harvard Law probably disagrees with you. As would UCLA and Phi Beta Kappa. Where did you go to school?

Like Walz, I went to a state college. I'm all for a good education, but book learning isn't everything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tim Walz always puts the toilet seat down.

This makes MAGAs mad because Ben Shapiro tells them that putting the toilet seat down is misandry.

why?

Because real men pee standing up. And being expected to cater to women by putting the seat down afterward is oppression. Evidence that the alpha male is being turned into a beta, exploited by hypergamous women for his resources.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The SEC voters won’t be impressed.

By "SEC voters" do you mean conservative White men? Because plenty of voters in SEC states will be impressed.

Citation?

Video of Kamala Harris' rally in Atlanta.

You think Walz is going to have appeal throughout the US?

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The SEC voters won’t be impressed.

By "SEC voters" do you mean conservative White men? Because plenty of voters in SEC states will be impressed.

Citation?

Video of Kamala Harris' rally in Atlanta.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Fake news...

Uh, there was video. Line was 6 blocks long this morning. The arena is totally packed.

This. And Shapiro is giving an awesome speech. For all you “homeless independents” - you should listen for yourselves to the “extreme” ideas he’s touting. They’re quite uplifting and optimistic. Much better than downer Debby Trump/Vance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tim Walz brought a hot dish to the party and said you can return the dish whenever.

He left the onions out because he knows that you’re allergic

Typical liberal.

You seem to be the type to hide allergens in food to "prove" to the person that their allergy is "all in their head". I've known people like you who have sent friends who have anaphylactic allergies to the ER. Anti-social jerks.