Anonymous
06/25/2022 14:15
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Violating a friend's medical privacy for social media likes is "too good" and makes you "happy"? You and this woman are classless trash. And I say that as someone who despises Ivanka and her closeted husband.
Friends are not bound to medical privacy. I guess she should have known better, shouldn't she.
Your post is a bit right isn't it, when you're then trying to "out" her husband.
Anonymous
06/25/2022 14:13
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Oh, yes, as Mississippi AG Fitch says women just need color-calendars to get their lives together. She also lived on a quail farm, and claims she had six women helping her -- women presumably all with successful careers and full families of their own. They must all have all gotten similar color-coded calendars. https://www.thelily.com/the-woman-who-could-bring-down-roe-v-wade/?utm_campaign=wp_thelily&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
Do you hear yourself? Tell me how many women CEO's of Fortune-500 there are right now? Why are women still working for pay equality? And, I'm sure you don't want to think about non-white women.
Are you always this willfully obtuse.
Anonymous
06/25/2022 14:10
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:I thought the left was against slut shaming? But somehow it becomes okay and viral worthy to out a then underage teenager’s sex life and abortion.
No one said she was a slut. She’s a filthy hypocrite. Much worse.
Anonymous
06/25/2022 14:09
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
I thought the left was against slut shaming? But somehow it becomes okay and viral worthy to out a then underage teenager’s sex life and abortion.
Anonymous
06/25/2022 14:00
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Let’s reflect on the fact that all that happened is power is returned to the people through their states!
Different strokes for different folks.
You can have abortion on demand in California or Massachusetts. We can respectfully restrict it here in the Deep South.
We all win.
Right, because poor women in the south can easily pop over to California. They’ll just take the shifts off work, book the plane ticket for them and their children, and pay for a hotel room. Then they’ll pay for the procedure in cash. Right? All so simple! And what about women who find out that their fetus is incompatible with life at the 20 week anatomy scan? They should put their own health and their sanity on the back burner so you can pretend you’re saving someone? Your feelings do not supersede anyone else’s right to obtain medical care. Period.
We now have 4D scans that are used for glamour photos of the baby. Our technology has far surpassed the 20 week scan, to the point where fetal surgery can be done to correct a lot of defects in utero.
I had a baby last year. The doctor specifically told me that they were looking for defects that could not be fixed. You can’t do a thing for a child who has missing or malformed organs. There are many women who find out at the anatomy scan that their child will not survive, no matter the medical intervention. I know some of them. They don’t deserve to be put through legal hell in what is certainly the worst week of their life. You are a terrible person.
I understand BUT they can do these scans much earlier now. They wait until 20 weeks for convenience. By 12 weeks, all organs are already there. There are genetic tests that can be done as early as 6-8 weeks. The states will further refine the laws.
This is good for Democrats as states use the popular vote, not electoral. So if you don’t like a governor, etc, you can vote them out via the popular vote. That’s why Virginia is usually decided by Fairfax and Loudoun.
None. Of. This. Matters.
All of this will be decided by legislatures and women have no rights to contest the most restrictive laws. Total bans. Just own what you’ve done.
DP. There are enough democrats who think this way. The PP could be one of them. Why are you pushing them away? Must we always be on DINO hunt?
Anonymous
06/25/2022 13:59
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Violating a friend's medical privacy for social media likes is "too good" and makes you "happy"? You and this woman are classless trash. And I say that as someone who despises Ivanka and her closeted husband.
Whose privacy was violated?
Anonymous
06/25/2022 13:58
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Violating a friend's medical privacy for social media likes is "too good" and makes you "happy"? You and this woman are classless trash. And I say that as someone who despises Ivanka and her closeted husband.
Normally I would agree with you, but Ivanka was the defacto First Lady and given a powerful position because of nepotism. She is no longer entitled to privacy as you or I would know it.
Anonymous
06/25/2022 13:57
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Well, six unelected judges just told women yo go f*ck themselves if they become pregnant because, as informed by their own religious beliefs, the Constitutions says they no longer have autonomy to make their own medical decisions, whether in consultation with a spouse or partner, or in their own. They become mere incubators because of Catholic orthodoxy about the magicsl act of fertilization.
Anonymous
06/25/2022 13:52
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
How arrogant to suggest that women have abortions because they have been lied to.
Anonymous
06/25/2022 13:48
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Violating a friend's medical privacy for social media likes is "too good" and makes you "happy"? You and this woman are classless trash. And I say that as someone who despises Ivanka and her closeted husband.
She was part of a regime that violated and erased the fundamental rights of every woman in this country. She doesn’t get to keep her secrets.
Anonymous
06/25/2022 13:34
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Violating a friend's medical privacy for social media likes is "too good" and makes you "happy"? You and this woman are classless trash. And I say that as someone who despises Ivanka and her closeted husband.
The SCOTUS struck down the right to privacy. Keep up.
Anonymous
06/25/2022 13:26
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Violating a friend's medical privacy for social media likes is "too good" and makes you "happy"? You and this woman are classless trash. And I say that as someone who despises Ivanka and her closeted husband.
Anonymous
Anonymous
06/25/2022 13:19
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Let’s reflect on the fact that all that happened is power is returned to the people through their states!
Different strokes for different folks.
You can have abortion on demand in California or Massachusetts. We can respectfully restrict it here in the Deep South.
We all win.
Right, because poor women in the south can easily pop over to California. They’ll just take the shifts off work, book the plane ticket for them and their children, and pay for a hotel room. Then they’ll pay for the procedure in cash. Right? All so simple! And what about women who find out that their fetus is incompatible with life at the 20 week anatomy scan? They should put their own health and their sanity on the back burner so you can pretend you’re saving someone? Your feelings do not supersede anyone else’s right to obtain medical care. Period.
We now have 4D scans that are used for glamour photos of the baby. Our technology has far surpassed the 20 week scan, to the point where fetal surgery can be done to correct a lot of defects in utero.
I had a baby last year. The doctor specifically told me that they were looking for defects that could not be fixed. You can’t do a thing for a child who has missing or malformed organs. There are many women who find out at the anatomy scan that their child will not survive, no matter the medical intervention. I know some of them. They don’t deserve to be put through legal hell in what is certainly the worst week of their life. You are a terrible person.
I understand BUT they can do these scans much earlier now. They wait until 20 weeks for convenience. By 12 weeks, all organs are already there. There are genetic tests that can be done as early as 6-8 weeks. The states will further refine the laws.
This is good for Democrats as states use the popular vote, not electoral. So if you don’t like a governor, etc, you can vote them out via the popular vote. That’s why Virginia is usually decided by Fairfax and Loudoun.
You really don’t understand anything at all, do you? Jesus when you get your sexual education and anatomy from Life News, you’re getting propaganda. No, the organs are not all there and looking like they do in an adult. And they’re tiny - the kidneys in a 12 week fetus are 1 cm, scanned through inches of flesh and tissue.
And for most healthy pregnancies, you get an internal scan confirming the pregnancy at your initial OB appointment around 6-8 weeks IIRC, then the 20 week scan. They’re not doing them every time.
And since you sound like you’re about 14, get ready for a real bomb - sometimes they find problems, serious problems, later on. Ultrasound is a magic wand is some senses but it’s not infallible. Water retention, fat, placental placement, how the fetus is lying in the uterus, a ton of other things I as a lay person doesn’t know all affect legibility of a scan.
that's why Democrats cant get anything done. they resort to nastiness, name calling and additional misinformation.
Typical Republican projection. Accuse your opponents before they accuse you.
You little snowflakes couldn’t even wear a f-ing mask in a grocery store for 15 minutes, but you expect women to carry around a baby inside them for 9 months. GROW UP>
Where do you expect women to carry their babies?
Anonymous
06/25/2022 13:16
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Let’s reflect on the fact that all that happened is power is returned to the people through their states!
Different strokes for different folks.
You can have abortion on demand in California or Massachusetts. We can respectfully restrict it here in the Deep South.
We all win.
Right, because poor women in the south can easily pop over to California. They’ll just take the shifts off work, book the plane ticket for them and their children, and pay for a hotel room. Then they’ll pay for the procedure in cash. Right? All so simple! And what about women who find out that their fetus is incompatible with life at the 20 week anatomy scan? They should put their own health and their sanity on the back burner so you can pretend you’re saving someone? Your feelings do not supersede anyone else’s right to obtain medical care. Period.
We now have 4D scans that are used for glamour photos of the baby. Our technology has far surpassed the 20 week scan, to the point where fetal surgery can be done to correct a lot of defects in utero.
I had a baby last year. The doctor specifically told me that they were looking for defects that could not be fixed. You can’t do a thing for a child who has missing or malformed organs. There are many women who find out at the anatomy scan that their child will not survive, no matter the medical intervention. I know some of them. They don’t deserve to be put through legal hell in what is certainly the worst week of their life. You are a terrible person.
I understand BUT they can do these scans much earlier now. They wait until 20 weeks for convenience. By 12 weeks, all organs are already there. There are genetic tests that can be done as early as 6-8 weeks. The states will further refine the laws.
This is good for Democrats as states use the popular vote, not electoral. So if you don’t like a governor, etc, you can vote them out via the popular vote. That’s why Virginia is usually decided by Fairfax and Loudoun.
You really don’t understand anything at all, do you? Jesus when you get your sexual education and anatomy from Life News, you’re getting propaganda. No, the organs are not all there and looking like they do in an adult. And they’re tiny - the kidneys in a 12 week fetus are 1 cm, scanned through inches of flesh and tissue.
And for most healthy pregnancies, you get an internal scan confirming the pregnancy at your initial OB appointment around 6-8 weeks IIRC, then the 20 week scan. They’re not doing them every time.
And since you sound like you’re about 14, get ready for a real bomb - sometimes they find problems, serious problems, later on. Ultrasound is a magic wand is some senses but it’s not infallible. Water retention, fat, placental placement, how the fetus is lying in the uterus, a ton of other things I as a lay person doesn’t know all affect legibility of a scan.
that's why Democrats cant get anything done. they resort to nastiness, name calling and additional misinformation.
Typical Republican projection. Accuse your opponents before they accuse you.
You little snowflakes couldn’t even wear a f-ing mask in a grocery store for 15 minutes, but you expect women to carry around a baby inside them for 9 months. GROW UP>