Anonymous wrote:PP qualifying a sexual advancement has nothing to do with politics. Kinda like Steve Sculley (who interned for Biden) being fair during the second debate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wife of Boston Marathon hero comes out on the inappropriate behavior of Biden

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/wife-of-boston-marathon-hero-said-biden-touched-her-in-an-inappropriate-and-uncomfortable-way

Another "Joe being Joe" moment that won't be covered by the complicit media.

Anonymous wrote:Wife of Boston Marathon hero comes out on the inappropriate behavior of Biden

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/wife-of-boston-marathon-hero-said-biden-touched-her-in-an-inappropriate-and-uncomfortable-way

Anonymous wrote:Wife of Boston Marathon hero comes out on the inappropriate behavior of Biden

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/wife-of-boston-marathon-hero-said-biden-touched-her-in-an-inappropriate-and-uncomfortable-way

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tara Reade is making a fool out of herself and more and more info comes out ... it looks like a typical maga- trump paid set up. I’m not even sure Biden ever met this woman. Tara Reade reminds me of the Lady in Tiger King series who owned big cats.
Reade is also trying to take down the MeToo movement. She is a Russian-trump asset paid money to murky up the waters surrounding Biden. This creates doubt in our minds. The thing is Trump did the same thing with Obama calling him a Kenyan then a terrorist and nothing was true. Then he said HRC was involved with “pizzagate” scandal that was false. The emails were nothing too. Benghazi was nothing too. Now he got stars Reade to fake a story. This is nothing too. These racist repubs will do anything to win they can harm, lie and kill.

It's highly possible Biden never met Reade. Somebody from his office at that time said people in Tara's position had an office down the hall from Biden's own office, separated by an entire different Senator's office. But, I suspect it's possible Biden had a hand-shake line-up ceremony of sorts for interns and lower-level staff, much like what happened when I was on the Hill.

It's laughable Cons dropped the Eva Murry allegation after only 2-3 days. That one was totally indefensible. Biden wasn't at the first even Murry claimed. So she claimed a second event--and turns out Biden wasn't at that one, either.

Don't know about money. But you're right, keeping this scandal front and center does keep it in peoples' minds.

Anonymous wrote:Tara Reade is making a fool out of herself and more and more info comes out ... it looks like a typical maga- trump paid set up. I’m not even sure Biden ever met this woman. Tara Reade reminds me of the Lady in Tiger King series who owned big cats.
Reade is also trying to take down the MeToo movement. She is a Russian-trump asset paid money to murky up the waters surrounding Biden. This creates doubt in our minds. The thing is Trump did the same thing with Obama calling him a Kenyan then a terrorist and nothing was true. Then he said HRC was involved with “pizzagate” scandal that was false. The emails were nothing too. Benghazi was nothing too. Now he got stars Reade to fake a story. This is nothing too. These racist repubs will do anything to win they can harm, lie and kill.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what "historically disadvantaged" or "under-represented" community she belongs to. Did she claim that she is "historically disadvantaged" by way of being a "victim" of domestic abuse?

The more we find out, the more she seems like a person who has been lying ALL of her life to take advantage of other people's sympathies. And because it is considered inappropriate to question someone who says they are a victim of domestic violence, she's has been able to get away with it.

Sickening.

Well she was a victim of domestic abuse that had a court ordered restraining order against her ex. She fled, becoming a divorced mother of a child and changed her name to protect herself and her child. Being a single parent and a survivor of domestic abuse that was living under an assumed name for protection seems like an historically disadvantaged situation. There are many such single mothers who need a second chance to get their life restarted. And that is certainly one type of situation that special programs like the Access Admission Program were designed to cover.

I'm not saying this as a Reade supporter, since I for one don't believe her allegations, but I certainly think that her history at that point was the type of story that special admissions programs would take into account.

No. She SAYS she experienced abuse. Her ex denies it.

See the pattern here?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what "historically disadvantaged" or "under-represented" community she belongs to. Did she claim that she is "historically disadvantaged" by way of being a "victim" of domestic abuse?

The more we find out, the more she seems like a person who has been lying ALL of her life to take advantage of other people's sympathies. And because it is considered inappropriate to question someone who says they are a victim of domestic violence, she's has been able to get away with it.

Sickening.

Well she was a victim of domestic abuse that had a court ordered restraining order against her ex. She fled, becoming a divorced mother of a child and changed her name to protect herself and her child. Being a single parent and a survivor of domestic abuse that was living under an assumed name for protection seems like an historically disadvantaged situation. There are many such single mothers who need a second chance to get their life restarted. And that is certainly one type of situation that special programs like the Access Admission Program were designed to cover.

I'm not saying this as a Reade supporter, since I for one don't believe her allegations, but I certainly think that her history at that point was the type of story that special admissions programs would take into account.

No. She SAYS she experienced abuse. Her ex denies it.

See the pattern here?

Not entirely.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/19/politics/tara-reade-biden-allegation/index.html

While he acknowledged that he was violent with Reade in February 1996 and said he apologized for that, he did not acknowledge other violent incidents Reade mentioned in her own testimony.

The incident that he acknowledged and which left her physically harmed (bruised), was the one for which she was granted the restraining order for and why she fled with their daughter. And while he did not acknowledge the other violent incidents, his word is just as suspect as hers is. Physical abuse that leaves marks is rarely an isolated incident. Most of the incidents that are one time only, are not so serious as to cause that amount of physical damage (I did a lot of research when my sister was seriously hurt by my a$$hole ex-BIL). This is very unlikely to be a one-time only offense.

But why, if she was in a protection program, did she go on the radio and publish articles with her picture, while living so close to him?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder what "historically disadvantaged" or "under-represented" community she belongs to. Did she claim that she is "historically disadvantaged" by way of being a "victim" of domestic abuse?

The more we find out, the more she seems like a person who has been lying ALL of her life to take advantage of other people's sympathies. And because it is considered inappropriate to question someone who says they are a victim of domestic violence, she's has been able to get away with it.

Sickening.

Well she was a victim of domestic abuse that had a court ordered restraining order against her ex. She fled, becoming a divorced mother of a child and changed her name to protect herself and her child. Being a single parent and a survivor of domestic abuse that was living under an assumed name for protection seems like an historically disadvantaged situation. There are many such single mothers who need a second chance to get their life restarted. And that is certainly one type of situation that special programs like the Access Admission Program were designed to cover.

I'm not saying this as a Reade supporter, since I for one don't believe her allegations, but I certainly think that her history at that point was the type of story that special admissions programs would take into account.

No. She SAYS she experienced abuse. Her ex denies it.

See the pattern here?

Not entirely.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/19/politics/tara-reade-biden-allegation/index.html

While he acknowledged that he was violent with Reade in February 1996 and said he apologized for that, he did not acknowledge other violent incidents Reade mentioned in her own testimony.

The incident that he acknowledged and which left her physically harmed (bruised), was the one for which she was granted the restraining order for and why she fled with their daughter. And while he did not acknowledge the other violent incidents, his word is just as suspect as hers is. Physical abuse that leaves marks is rarely an isolated incident. Most of the incidents that are one time only, are not so serious as to cause that amount of physical damage (I did a lot of research when my sister was seriously hurt by my a$$hole ex-BIL). This is very unlikely to be a one-time only offense.