Anonymous wrote:The Dems should just give $5 billion for the wall. Keeping the government shut over this isn't worth it.
Anonymous wrote:The Dems should just give $5 billion for the wall. Keeping the government shut over this isn't worth it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An additional concession on each side, and it's settled:
1) Trump agrees to extend DACA protections by six years, meaning he would be out of the WH and the next president would decide.
2) Pelosi delivers legislation that illegals cannot sneak into to this country, knowing that if they're caught they can still stay by claiming asylum.
(And of course the $5 billion for the wall.)
A temporary DACA extension is worthless. All it does is kick the can down the road, it doesn’t solve anything.
Yes it does. It moves it into the next president's court, and thus the people decide via their votes.
And besides, Democrats can't hold out for the "ideal" - they need to settle for a big improvement. If they keep the govt shut down if it comes down to the DACA issue, they'll look like they have their priorities upside down (like last time).
You are missing the Dems’ real point, which is that this isn’t how any kind of deal should be done. Funding the government is supposed to be a simple administrative process that happens without much fanfare to then let the government do the actual work of debating things like walls and DACA. Holding the government hostage to get something you couldn’t otherwise get through the standard legislative process because you don’t have enough support is an abuse of the process and of our system of government. That’s what the Dems are taking a hard line on, not DACA. Reopen the government, let it function the way it’s supposed to, and then negotiate the wall the proper way.[u]
For the back rows
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An additional concession on each side, and it's settled:
1) Trump agrees to extend DACA protections by six years, meaning he would be out of the WH and the next president would decide.
2) Pelosi delivers legislation that illegals cannot sneak into to this country, knowing that if they're caught they can still stay by claiming asylum.
(And of course the $5 billion for the wall.)
A temporary DACA extension is worthless. All it does is kick the can down the road, it doesn’t solve anything.
Yes it does. It moves it into the next president's court, and thus the people decide via their votes.
And besides, Democrats can't hold out for the "ideal" - they need to settle for a big improvement. If they keep the govt shut down if it comes down to the DACA issue, they'll look like they have their priorities upside down (like last time).
You are missing the Dems’ real point, which is that this isn’t how any kind of deal should be done. Funding the government is supposed to be a simple administrative process that happens without much fanfare to then let the government do the actual work of debating things like walls and DACA. Holding the government hostage to get something you couldn’t otherwise get through the standard legislative process because you don’t have enough support is an abuse of the process and of our system of government. That’s what the Dems are taking a hard line on, not DACA. Reopen the government, let it function the way it’s supposed to, and then negotiate the wall the proper way.[u]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Where’s McConnell?
He is following the will of his party.
Anonymous wrote:
Where’s McConnell?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An additional concession on each side, and it's settled:
1) Trump agrees to extend DACA protections by six years, meaning he would be out of the WH and the next president would decide.
2) Pelosi delivers legislation that illegals cannot sneak into to this country, knowing that if they're caught they can still stay by claiming asylum.
(And of course the $5 billion for the wall.)
A temporary DACA extension is worthless. All it does is kick the can down the road, it doesn’t solve anything.
Yes it does. It moves it into the next president's court, and thus the people decide via their votes.
And besides, Democrats can't hold out for the "ideal" - they need to settle for a big improvement. If they keep the govt shut down if it comes down to the DACA issue, they'll look like they have their priorities upside down (like last time).
You are missing the Dems’ real point, which is that this isn’t how any kind of deal should be done. Funding the government is supposed to be a simple administrative process that happens without much fanfare to then let the government do the actual work of debating things like walls and DACA. Holding the government hostage to get something you couldn’t otherwise get through the standard legislative process because you don’t have enough support is an abuse of the process and of our system of government. That’s what the Dems are taking a hard line on, not DACA. Reopen the government, let it function the way it’s supposed to, and then negotiate the wall the proper way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An additional concession on each side, and it's settled:
1) Trump agrees to extend DACA protections by six years, meaning he would be out of the WH and the next president would decide.
2) Pelosi delivers legislation that illegals cannot sneak into to this country, knowing that if they're caught they can still stay by claiming asylum.
(And of course the $5 billion for the wall.)
A temporary DACA extension is worthless. All it does is kick the can down the road, it doesn’t solve anything.
Yes it does. It moves it into the next president's court, and thus the people decide via their votes.
And besides, Democrats can't hold out for the "ideal" - they need to settle for a big improvement. If they keep the govt shut down if it comes down to the DACA issue, they'll look like they have their priorities upside down (like last time).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An additional concession on each side, and it's settled:
1) Trump agrees to extend DACA protections by six years, meaning he would be out of the WH and the next president would decide.
2) Pelosi delivers legislation that illegals cannot sneak into to this country, knowing that if they're caught they can still stay by claiming asylum.
(And of course the $5 billion for the wall.)
A temporary DACA extension is worthless. All it does is kick the can down the road, it doesn’t solve anything.
Yes it does. It moves it into the next president's court, and thus the people decide via their votes.
And besides, Democrats can't hold out for the "ideal" - they need to settle for a big improvement. If they keep the govt shut down if it comes down to the DACA issue, they'll look like they have their priorities upside down (like last time).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We *had* a Central American Minors refugee program so that minors could be processed in their home countries and the Trump administration terminated it.
Who created the crisis?
Obama created it with his DACA program in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An additional concession on each side, and it's settled:
1) Trump agrees to extend DACA protections by six years, meaning he would be out of the WH and the next president would decide.
2) Pelosi delivers legislation that illegals cannot sneak into to this country, knowing that if they're caught they can still stay by claiming asylum.
(And of course the $5 billion for the wall.)
The courts have handled DACA. Does Trump even know that?
Has the Supreme Court “handled” it yet? If so, please provide a citation. TIA!