Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Jesus would teach a person who is able to support themselves not to be on welfare their whole lives, unlike the intergenerational welfare we have now.
You are not "owed".
I believe his primary commandment was to love.
Not making people who are perfectly capable of independence, dependent on others is love. Tough love, but love nonetheless.
The majority of people receiving SNAP benefits are NOT “capable of independence”, fool. That’s WHY they receive SNAP benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Jesus would teach a person who is able to support themselves not to be on welfare their whole lives, unlike the intergenerational welfare we have now.
You are not "owed".
I believe his primary commandment was to love.
Not making people who are perfectly capable of independence, dependent on others is love. Tough love, but love nonetheless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Jesus would teach a person who is able to support themselves not to be on welfare their whole lives, unlike the intergenerational welfare we have now.
You are not "owed".
I believe his primary commandment was to love.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Jesus would teach a person who is able to support themselves not to be on welfare their whole lives, unlike the intergenerational welfare we have now.
You are not "owed".
Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Anonymous wrote:
You can’t use contingency funds unless the program is running. Democrats voted no, so the program stopped running. Therefore you also can’t use contingency funds until they vote yes. It’s a simple concept but Dems don’t seem to be getting it. Go look it up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Jesus would teach a person who is able to support themselves not to be on welfare their whole lives, unlike the intergenerational welfare we have now.
You are not "owed".
Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Jesus would teach a person who is able to support themselves not to be on welfare their whole lives, unlike the intergenerational welfare we have now.
You are not "owed".
Anonymous wrote:What I love is how the Republicans proclaim to be Christian but cut food aid to the poor. Is that what Jesus would do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump asked the judge to tell him how to fund SNAP legally. The judge appears to have ordered 'find the money'.
Trump needs something a little more explicit so he can deliver the funds, and then use the same reasoning to deliver funds to other programs.
It is the president’s job to lawfully execute the laws congress has passed. The funds are legally available.
If Russ Vought has suddenly forgotten how to apportion legally available funds then he needs to be fired. They can also
Lawfully transfer tariff revenues to snap just as they did for WIC and plan to do for farmer bailouts.
The amount of law breaking they are doing to fund military salaries and other things they WANT to do but have far less legal basis while playing dumb on SNAP is insane.
Vought is incompetent and demonstrates daily his lack of knowledge, skills and ability to manage a budget. He needs to be RIF’ed and go back to stewing in his own filth at the Heritage Foundation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump asked the judge to tell him how to fund SNAP legally. The judge appears to have ordered 'find the money'.
Trump needs something a little more explicit so he can deliver the funds, and then use the same reasoning to deliver funds to other programs.
It is the president’s job to lawfully execute the laws congress has passed. The funds are legally available.
If Russ Vought has suddenly forgotten how to apportion legally available funds then he needs to be fired. They can also
Lawfully transfer tariff revenues to snap just as they did for WIC and plan to do for farmer bailouts.
The amount of law breaking they are doing to fund military salaries and other things they WANT to do but have far less legal basis while playing dumb on SNAP is insane.