Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:34
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
It was priority 7 from Region 6.
So they ignored priorities 1-6 and went with this one? Wow, okay.
No. I’m pretty sure they incorporated those too.
This was recommendation number 6: "Adjust boundaries to increase enrollment at Lewis to address overcrowding. Community members pointed out that Lewis is
underutilized and suggested that boundaries be adjusted to better utilize Lewis and increase socioeconomic diversity."
Lewis families must be furious
Yes. Lewis was systematically ignored.
It needs to be closed
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:31
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
It was priority 7 from Region 6.
So they ignored priorities 1-6 and went with this one? Wow, okay.
No. I’m pretty sure they incorporated those too.
This was recommendation number 6: "Adjust boundaries to increase enrollment at Lewis to address overcrowding. Community members pointed out that Lewis is
underutilized and suggested that boundaries be adjusted to better utilize Lewis and increase socioeconomic diversity."
Lewis families must be furious
Yes. Lewis was systematically ignored.
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:29
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
It was priority 7 from Region 6.
So they ignored priorities 1-6 and went with this one? Wow, okay.
No. I’m pretty sure they incorporated those too.
This was recommendation number 6: "Adjust boundaries to increase enrollment at Lewis to address overcrowding. Community members pointed out that Lewis is
underutilized and suggested that boundaries be adjusted to better utilize Lewis and increase socioeconomic diversity."
Lewis families must be furious
Especially the Rolling Valley houses getting sent to Saratoga, while the other group gets sent to WSHS
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:28
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
It was priority 7 from Region 6.
So they ignored priorities 1-6 and went with this one? Wow, okay.
No. I’m pretty sure they incorporated those too.
This was recommendation number 6: "Adjust boundaries to increase enrollment at Lewis to address overcrowding. Community members pointed out that Lewis is
underutilized and suggested that boundaries be adjusted to better utilize Lewis and increase socioeconomic diversity."
Lewis families must be furious
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:28
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
It was priority 7 from Region 6.
So they ignored priorities 1-6 and went with this one? Wow, okay.
No. I’m pretty sure they incorporated those too.
This was recommendation number 6: "Adjust boundaries to increase enrollment at Lewis to address overcrowding. Community members pointed out that Lewis is
underutilized and suggested that boundaries be adjusted to better utilize Lewis and increase socioeconomic diversity."
Apologies, they seemed to have incorporated all of the specific changes. If Lewis had listed specific neighborhoods they wanted, THRU probably would have given them to them.
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:23
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
It was priority 7 from Region 6.
So they ignored priorities 1-6 and went with this one? Wow, okay.
No. I’m pretty sure they incorporated those too.
This was recommendation number 6: "Adjust boundaries to increase enrollment at Lewis to address overcrowding. Community members pointed out that Lewis is
underutilized and suggested that boundaries be adjusted to better utilize Lewis and increase socioeconomic diversity."
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:19
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
It was priority 7 from Region 6.
So they ignored priorities 1-6 and went with this one? Wow, okay.
No. I’m pretty sure they incorporated those too.
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:17
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
It was priority 7 from Region 6.
So they ignored priorities 1-6 and went with this one? Wow, okay.
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:15
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
That was a special request from the Springfield school board rep.
She has been talking about swapping Rolling Valley with one of the other WSHS neighborhoods since the boundary process began.
It was a BRAC request from Lewis: https://www.fcps.edu/system/files/forms/2025-09/advisory_priority_analysis_-_region_6_9-8_update_epg1_0.pdf
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:14
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
It was priority 7 from Region 6.
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:12
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
That was a special request from the Springfield school board rep.
She has been talking about swapping Rolling Valley with one of the other WSHS neighborhoods since the boundary process began.
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:10
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:They already have a plan. This is all for show.
It does sound like Scenario 4 is just a map that represents feedback from the BRAC. It doesn't represent the views of FCPS staff. So that's pretty concerning.
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:07
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
The Thru consultant looked annoyed at her and basically blew her off, cause she spitballed a number of kids that could go to WSHS from those 200 townhomes. The consultant didn't answer why they added that neighborhood to WSHS.
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:05
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.
Interesting.
Anonymous
10/13/2025 19:04
Subject: Boundary Review Meetings
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If anyone is watching the phase 2 meeting at Robinson, they had three split feeders...surprise, surprise they kept all three as split feeders in the pyramid.
Ooh.
Dish more please
Right now a parent is railing against adding Rolling Valley to WSHS
...Oh, and add a 4th spilt feeder they did not fix (so they fixed zero split feeders). They did close one attendance island.