Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope. 1 team will go GA, the other will go GA2 next year. No one is going to voluntarily go GA2 if they can go GA. When the “alliance” ended, they should have ended NVA, and this wouldn’t be an issue. But since one club now had NVA considered the top team and LS, the kids will head to what is marketed as the top team. Whether it is or not.

Stop it…NVA/LS will continue to field 2 teams in GA1 next year. Up to a player to decide where the best fit is. Coaching does matter…

Is that why Roberto was fired despite the club telling families he was an asset? Lols

2 average teams in GA1. Or one average (NVA) and the other is mediocre (loudoun). Should have kept RP. Management mess.

RP laughing it up over at ARL now. He couldn’t get out of there fast enough.

I still remember him asking for $90k for two teams when interviewing with NE at VRSC a few years ago lmao

You know what I do when I don’t want a job? I give a big number that I know they won’t match.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope. 1 team will go GA, the other will go GA2 next year. No one is going to voluntarily go GA2 if they can go GA. When the “alliance” ended, they should have ended NVA, and this wouldn’t be an issue. But since one club now had NVA considered the top team and LS, the kids will head to what is marketed as the top team. Whether it is or not.

Stop it…NVA/LS will continue to field 2 teams in GA1 next year. Up to a player to decide where the best fit is. Coaching does matter…

Is that why Roberto was fired despite the club telling families he was an asset? Lols

2 average teams in GA1. Or one average (NVA) and the other is mediocre (loudoun). Should have kept RP. Management mess.

RP laughing it up over at ARL now. He couldn’t get out of there fast enough.

I still remember him asking for $90k for two teams when interviewing with NE at VRSC a few years ago lmao

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope. 1 team will go GA, the other will go GA2 next year. No one is going to voluntarily go GA2 if they can go GA. When the “alliance” ended, they should have ended NVA, and this wouldn’t be an issue. But since one club now had NVA considered the top team and LS, the kids will head to what is marketed as the top team. Whether it is or not.

Stop it…NVA/LS will continue to field 2 teams in GA1 next year. Up to a player to decide where the best fit is. Coaching does matter…

Is that why Roberto was fired despite the club telling families he was an asset? Lols

2 average teams in GA1. Or one average (NVA) and the other is mediocre (loudoun). Should have kept RP. Management mess.

RP laughing it up over at ARL now. He couldn’t get out of there fast enough.

Who cares!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope. 1 team will go GA, the other will go GA2 next year. No one is going to voluntarily go GA2 if they can go GA. When the “alliance” ended, they should have ended NVA, and this wouldn’t be an issue. But since one club now had NVA considered the top team and LS, the kids will head to what is marketed as the top team. Whether it is or not.

Stop it…NVA/LS will continue to field 2 teams in GA1 next year. Up to a player to decide where the best fit is. Coaching does matter…

Is that why Roberto was fired despite the club telling families he was an asset? Lols

2 average teams in GA1. Or one average (NVA) and the other is mediocre (loudoun). Should have kept RP. Management mess.

RP laughing it up over at ARL now. He couldn’t get out of there fast enough.

From the NVA website

NVA GA and Loudoun GA will coexist in the GA National League as part of the same overall Girls Academy platform. NVA GA is the marquee and 1st-tier program within the structure, offering the highest level of competition and exposure. This structure mirrors successful multi-club models seen in other top leagues and allows for strong internal competition while maximizing player development and exposure.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope. 1 team will go GA, the other will go GA2 next year. No one is going to voluntarily go GA2 if they can go GA. When the “alliance” ended, they should have ended NVA, and this wouldn’t be an issue. But since one club now had NVA considered the top team and LS, the kids will head to what is marketed as the top team. Whether it is or not.

Stop it…NVA/LS will continue to field 2 teams in GA1 next year. Up to a player to decide where the best fit is. Coaching does matter…

Is that why Roberto was fired despite the club telling families he was an asset? Lols

2 average teams in GA1. Or one average (NVA) and the other is mediocre (loudoun). Should have kept RP. Management mess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope. 1 team will go GA, the other will go GA2 next year. No one is going to voluntarily go GA2 if they can go GA. When the “alliance” ended, they should have ended NVA, and this wouldn’t be an issue. But since one club now had NVA considered the top team and LS, the kids will head to what is marketed as the top team. Whether it is or not.

Stop it…NVA/LS will continue to field 2 teams in GA1 next year. Up to a player to decide where the best fit is. Coaching does matter…

Is that why Roberto was fired despite the club telling families he was an asset? Lols

Anonymous wrote:Nope. 1 team will go GA, the other will go GA2 next year. No one is going to voluntarily go GA2 if they can go GA. When the “alliance” ended, they should have ended NVA, and this wouldn’t be an issue. But since one club now had NVA considered the top team and LS, the kids will head to what is marketed as the top team. Whether it is or not.

Stop it…NVA/LS will continue to field 2 teams in GA1 next year. Up to a player to decide where the best fit is. Coaching does matter…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LS girls also doing mid season IDs.
Half of one age group of current NVA have been spotted at my childs training over the last month

Half of NVA have been at LS IDs?

With the anticipated age group changes this would make sense IYKYK

Anonymous wrote:LS girls also doing mid season IDs.
Half of one age group of current NVA have been spotted at my childs training over the last month

Half of NVA have been at LS IDs?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LS girls also doing mid season IDs.
Half of one age group of current NVA have been spotted at my childs training over the last month

Are the season ID to join team now or is this a tryout for next season? Seems early for next season!

Teams may need players now. Depends on the age group.

Anonymous wrote:LS girls also doing mid season IDs.
Half of one age group of current NVA have been spotted at my childs training over the last month

Are the season ID to join team now or is this a tryout for next season? Seems early for next season!

LS girls also doing mid season IDs.
Half of one age group of current NVA have been spotted at my childs training over the last month

Anonymous wrote:Nope. 1 team will go GA, the other will go GA2 next year. No one is going to voluntarily go GA2 if they can go GA. When the “alliance” ended, they should have ended NVA, and this wouldn’t be an issue. But since one club now had NVA considered the top team and LS, the kids will head to what is marketed as the top team. Whether it is or not.

This is correct and also why they created NVA. They can claim two "top teams" within one organization.

Nope. 1 team will go GA, the other will go GA2 next year. No one is going to voluntarily go GA2 if they can go GA. When the “alliance” ended, they should have ended NVA, and this wouldn’t be an issue. But since one club now had NVA considered the top team and LS, the kids will head to what is marketed as the top team. Whether it is or not.