Anonymous
Post 06/25/2023 14:36     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The President cannot be above the law.


Ex FBI does not have declassification powers.

Ex Presidents don’t either.
Anonymous
Post 06/25/2023 14:18     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The President cannot be above the law.


Ex FBI does not have declassification powers.
Anonymous
Post 06/25/2023 14:12     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


This is fantastic info. Thanks for posting. She has a lot of good info

You’re welcome! I knew August sounded optimistically soon given the national security issues.
Anonymous
Post 06/25/2023 13:45     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:


This is fantastic info. Thanks for posting. She has a lot of good info
Anonymous
Post 06/23/2023 20:12     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous
Post 06/23/2023 20:12     Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.



The WSJ news part has always been fine. It’s their Op-ed pages where the nut jobs come out.

That doesn’t make it better, and while I don’t have the energy to go run down a bunch of links you won’t read, I’m pretty sure that WSJ’s coverage is as slanted as all right wing media is. There’s a reason that all Republicans have all the same talking points down to the weird term or new person’s name no one outside the wingnutsphere has ever heard of.

A friend of mine worked for the WSJ for years. The rightward lurch has definitely lost them some very good reporters.
Anonymous
Post 06/23/2023 19:33     Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.



The WSJ news part has always been fine. It’s their Op-ed pages where the nut jobs come out.

That doesn’t make it better, and while I don’t have the energy to go run down a bunch of links you won’t read, I’m pretty sure that WSJ’s coverage is as slanted as all right wing media is. There’s a reason that all Republicans have all the same talking points down to the weird term or new person’s name no one outside the wingnutsphere has ever heard of.
Anonymous
Post 06/23/2023 17:03     Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.



The WSJ news part has always been fine. It’s their Op-ed pages where the nut jobs come out.

+1
Anonymous
Post 06/23/2023 17:00     Subject: Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:

Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.



The WSJ news part has always been fine. It’s their Op-ed pages where the nut jobs come out.
Anonymous
Post 06/23/2023 12:34     Subject: Lock him up indictment FL


Nice to see a hint of reason from the right-leaning, previously pro-Trump WSJ.


Anonymous
Post 06/23/2023 11:47     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Trump Prosecutors Struggled Over Motives. Then They Heard the Tape.

Anonymous
Post 06/22/2023 20:35     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:


The President cannot be above the law.
Anonymous
Post 06/22/2023 20:34     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous
Post 06/22/2023 20:02     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL

Anonymous
Post 06/21/2023 18:21     Subject: Re:Lock him up indictment FL
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Video here:

Hahahahahahaha Trumpbots noticed that Trump is out there with Bret Baier incriminating himself.

He incriminated himself dozens of times during his presidency***. I can’t believe they’re still feeling betrayed.