Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m sure nobody cares, but as a Magruder Mom I find the bickering about snacks to be poor form.
I agree. Do you have any sense of why the lockdown continued for 3 hours after the arrest?
Making sure no others were involved.
Fully collect evidence before students move around.
Investigate the room the shooter was in an interview/support witnesses.
Securing buses.
Having support personnel/admin to handle student issues.
Creating a plan to move students room by room phalanxed by cops and sorted into groups of bus riders, car riders, and walkers/bike riders.
It was quite complicated. The biggest problem was learning more from twitter/news than from school admin. They weren’t allowed to say much to anyone once police took over.
-Magruder teacher who thankfully had great kids and no problems.
You were inside the school and had no idea that the buses were lined up for over two hours outside the school. It was all on the continuing news coverage. Enough with that fake excuse.
It was a school dismissal. Does it take 3 1/2 hours every day to "sort" students? Of course not.
Anonymous wrote:Insider here:
The press conference timing had nothing to do with releasing the kids.
The press conference was to provide information to the public. The police and school administration were accounting for everyone else, searching for further evidence, and determining an order of release. It doesn't get wrapped up neatly like a one hour police drama.
Anonymous wrote:Insider here:
The press conference timing had nothing to do with releasing the kids.
The press conference was to provide information to the public. The police and school administration were accounting for everyone else, searching for further evidence, and determining an order of release. It doesn't get wrapped up neatly like a one hour police drama.
Anonymous wrote:Thank you to the Macgruder parent and teacher who gave an explanation of the dismissal process. I was worried the kids were jn the lockdown for the whole 5 hours worried thr gunman was still at large. It sounds like that was t the case and I’m glad. I can’t imagine being afraid for your life like that for five slow hours.
Anonymous wrote:Any news on how the victim is doing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child was in a shooter lockdown in California for 3 hours.
Often it's a case of not knowing if there are more shooters, weapons, plans, and consequently = vulnerable children.
He was 6 years old and hid behind a chair with a friend. They all took turns peeing in the industrial sink in the classroom as that was the only option.
Really I think worrying about peeing and snacks is just, well, so disconnected from reality that it's disturbing.
Really? What is disturbing is that students were still in a lockdown while elected officials held a press conference outside to talk about themselves.
The press conference shouldn't have been held until the event was over and it wasn't over.
And if they didn’t give an update you’d be complaining that it took so long to have your elected officials tell you what was going on.
+1
They didn’t give an update. They publicly congratulated themselves and McKnight walked off without answering a single question.
So I'm just wondering - what is it exactly, that you want? you want that there was no shooting - yes, we all agree on that, but what else? A faster emergency response? No shooter kid in the classroom with the regular kids? Please enlighten us. Otherwise this just is yet another generalized anti-MCPS rant. And that's a waste of time.
I want them for once to put the kids first. Without the kids they wouldn’t have jobs in the first place.
What does that mean in the Magruder context?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child was in a shooter lockdown in California for 3 hours.
Often it's a case of not knowing if there are more shooters, weapons, plans, and consequently = vulnerable children.
He was 6 years old and hid behind a chair with a friend. They all took turns peeing in the industrial sink in the classroom as that was the only option.
Really I think worrying about peeing and snacks is just, well, so disconnected from reality that it's disturbing.
Really? What is disturbing is that students were still in a lockdown while elected officials held a press conference outside to talk about themselves.
The press conference shouldn't have been held until the event was over and it wasn't over.
And if they didn’t give an update you’d be complaining that it took so long to have your elected officials tell you what was going on.
+1
They didn’t give an update. They publicly congratulated themselves and McKnight walked off without answering a single question.
So I'm just wondering - what is it exactly, that you want? you want that there was no shooting - yes, we all agree on that, but what else? A faster emergency response? No shooter kid in the classroom with the regular kids? Please enlighten us. Otherwise this just is yet another generalized anti-MCPS rant. And that's a waste of time.
I want them for once to put the kids first. Without the kids they wouldn’t have jobs in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child was in a shooter lockdown in California for 3 hours.
Often it's a case of not knowing if there are more shooters, weapons, plans, and consequently = vulnerable children.
He was 6 years old and hid behind a chair with a friend. They all took turns peeing in the industrial sink in the classroom as that was the only option.
Really I think worrying about peeing and snacks is just, well, so disconnected from reality that it's disturbing.
Really? What is disturbing is that students were still in a lockdown while elected officials held a press conference outside to talk about themselves.
The press conference shouldn't have been held until the event was over and it wasn't over.
And if they didn’t give an update you’d be complaining that it took so long to have your elected officials tell you what was going on.
+1
They didn’t give an update. They publicly congratulated themselves and McKnight walked off without answering a single question.
So I'm just wondering - what is it exactly, that you want? you want that there was no shooting - yes, we all agree on that, but what else? A faster emergency response? No shooter kid in the classroom with the regular kids? Please enlighten us. Otherwise this just is yet another generalized anti-MCPS rant. And that's a waste of time.
I want them for once to put the kids first. Without the kids they wouldn’t have jobs in the first place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child was in a shooter lockdown in California for 3 hours.
Often it's a case of not knowing if there are more shooters, weapons, plans, and consequently = vulnerable children.
He was 6 years old and hid behind a chair with a friend. They all took turns peeing in the industrial sink in the classroom as that was the only option.
Really I think worrying about peeing and snacks is just, well, so disconnected from reality that it's disturbing.
Really? What is disturbing is that students were still in a lockdown while elected officials held a press conference outside to talk about themselves.
The press conference shouldn't have been held until the event was over and it wasn't over.
And if they didn’t give an update you’d be complaining that it took so long to have your elected officials tell you what was going on.
+1
They didn’t give an update. They publicly congratulated themselves and McKnight walked off without answering a single question.
So I'm just wondering - what is it exactly, that you want? you want that there was no shooting - yes, we all agree on that, but what else? A faster emergency response? No shooter kid in the classroom with the regular kids? Please enlighten us. Otherwise this just is yet another generalized anti-MCPS rant. And that's a waste of time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child was in a shooter lockdown in California for 3 hours.
Often it's a case of not knowing if there are more shooters, weapons, plans, and consequently = vulnerable children.
He was 6 years old and hid behind a chair with a friend. They all took turns peeing in the industrial sink in the classroom as that was the only option.
Really I think worrying about peeing and snacks is just, well, so disconnected from reality that it's disturbing.
Really? What is disturbing is that students were still in a lockdown while elected officials held a press conference outside to talk about themselves.
The press conference shouldn't have been held until the event was over and it wasn't over.
And if they didn’t give an update you’d be complaining that it took so long to have your elected officials tell you what was going on.
+1
They didn’t give an update. They publicly congratulated themselves and McKnight walked off without answering a single question.