Anonymous wrote:
I sure hope it’s beyond party loyalty, because so far zero Republicans have shown any loyalty to the US over their party identity. Not a single Republican has left the GOP, nor have there been any consequences for any Republican within the party who has worked with Russia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”
Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).
You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?
"Made up Moscow novel" - 75%-80% of which was independently corroborated, remainder either with minor nonsubstantive errors, or unproven, but also not disproven (i.e. the pee tape).
It's wild how the MAGAs run around pretending as if the Steele Dossier was somehow disproven or proven to be completely false, when no such concrete disproving of it never actually happened - and when so much of it actually did turn out to be true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”
Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).
You mean John Podesta stated under oath that Hillary and the DNC each paid 50% for a made up Moscow novel?
Anonymous wrote:For those who (still) don’t believe in the Steele Dossier: “There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.”
Oh, it’s real alright. Though none of us knows what it is (I have my theories).
Anonymous wrote:This guy shows up in the weirdest of places too!
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/russian-oligarch-keeps-showing-most-inconvenient-places
Anonymous wrote:Very telling where we are as a country that this is not a nuclear bomb of a story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Connect the dots...
Trump -> Manafort - Derispaka
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/manafort-had-10-million-loan-from-russian-oligarch-court-filing-idUSKBN1JN2YF
Guiliani had ties to the FBI field office because he is the one who cleared out the Italian mob to make way for the russian mob.
This guy from the FBI field office gets money from the Russian oligarch and then goes to work at a shaday real estate front.
There are no coincidences.
Wasn't this the guy who also declared that there was no Russian connection to the Trump campaign? I can't wait to see what other rot this exposes.