Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.
There is no advantage to economy.
It beats getting stuck in traffic.
Not really.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.
There is no advantage to economy.
It beats getting stuck in traffic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.
There is no advantage to economy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.
There is no advantage to economy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
You must be bummed that you're not wealthy enough to fly private and have to share your aluminum tube with the unwashed masses. Sad!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
I only fly business or first class and have never gotten a note from the crew. What do they say in the note?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
I only fly business or first class and have never gotten a note from the crew. What do they say in the note?
“When the revolution comes, you will be among the first eaten.”
You just try it. There are 400,000,000 guns in the U.S. at the ready.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
I only fly business or first class and have never gotten a note from the crew. What do they say in the note?
“When the revolution comes, you will be among the first eaten.”
You just try it. There are 400,000,000 guns in the U.S. at the ready.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
I only fly business or first class and have never gotten a note from the crew. What do they say in the note?
“When the revolution comes, you will be among the first eaten.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.
I only fly business or first class and have never gotten a note from the crew. What do they say in the note?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.
Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!
Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.
I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.
I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.
Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.
What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?
Game on.
Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.
I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.
You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.
Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.
When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.
You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.
I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.