Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some EVs include a tax credit for $7500. Did you factor that in?

Also less maintenance -- no oil changes, spark plugs, etc needed.

EVs eat through tires very quickly. Tires can easily be $1,000 for four.

20% faster. So, that’s roughly a $200 penalty or around 1.333 dealer oil changes. In a city, you’re lucky to get full use of your tires before you put a hole in one and need to replace a pair. I don’t think I’ve had worn out treads in 15 years.

No idea what you are talking about. I have only replaced tires due to low treads, and I have lived in many cities.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some EVs include a tax credit for $7500. Did you factor that in?

Also less maintenance -- no oil changes, spark plugs, etc needed.

EVs eat through tires very quickly. Tires can easily be $1,000 for four.

20% faster. So, that’s roughly a $200 penalty or around 1.333 dealer oil changes. In a city, you’re lucky to get full use of your tires before you put a hole in one and need to replace a pair. I don’t think I’ve had worn out treads in 15 years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some EVs include a tax credit for $7500. Did you factor that in?

Also less maintenance -- no oil changes, spark plugs, etc needed.

EVs eat through tires very quickly. Tires can easily be $1,000 for four.

Anonymous wrote:Some EVs include a tax credit for $7500. Did you factor that in?

Also less maintenance -- no oil changes, spark plugs, etc needed.

Anonymous wrote:Depends on where you live. Major city with chargers and you have an at home charger? Yes. If not no it doesn’t and makes life more stressful. I just did a huge road trip that took me through Texas which is the US home of Tesla and outside of Austin and Houston I didn’t see any charging centers. It would have been a pain to do this trip had I had a Tesla.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:EVs are largely a scam. Compared to a hybrid, an EV is worse for the environment (from pollution during battery production and reduced vehicle lifespan even with battery replacements) and costs more money (vehicle price, insurance premiums, cost of electricity, rapid depreciation, etc)

None of this is actually true.

All of it is true. In some areas of the country, depending on gas prices and home electricity prices, charging is more expensive than gas. An ICE vehicle will last 2-3x as long as an EV because replacing the battery on an older EV costs more than the vehicle is worth.

Charging to full is not even close to more expensive than a full tank of gas. In fact, filling my gas tank is 10x more expensive than the rare time I had to charge to full at a rest stop. The one time we did that we stared that number in utter disbelief that anyone would buy a gas car again. But in reality, we programed the car to charge at home in off peak night hours or when our solar is overproducing.

Look at what percentage of new car purchases are EV in the US and then you can suspend your disbelief. It has never broken 10%. Most people wouldn’t consider them a replacement for a gas/hybrid vehicle.

If only the world was as small as the us. Except… it’s not. Over 80% of new cars sold in Norway are ev’s. China will be at 20% by 2025. The us is in deep s&$t if it does not keep up.

And most people did not think a car would be replacement for a horse and cart in the early 1900’s. Enjoy your horse and buggy grandma.

Government subsidies and charging infrastructure vary across the world. You speak like a child. Why exactly is the US in trouble? Because less than 10% of new vehicles sold here are EVs?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, but it sure seems to, though it isn't why we got one. We also have solar, so that lowers the cost of home charging. I say it seems to because the only costs are purchase price and electricity, which is pennies whereas filling the gas tank is $50-$100 2-3 times per month, and gas doesn't last as long. We rarely need to fully charge the EV, and rarely drop below 40% -- usually its around 70%, and we keep it at the recommended 80% expect for longer trips.

The difference in time (and money) spent on "car stuff" is something we hadn't anticipated making a difference to us, but the EV to hybrid car ownership experience for us is like the difference between a native plant in the right place compared to an exotic, fussy, non-native in a less than ideal spot - so much more work for the hybrid. Once we got used to the EV, the time spent on little things for the hybrid, like getting gas, oil changes, inspections, maintenance issues, became extra annoying simply because we never have to do it for the EV. So now we fuss over who has to deal with the "primitive vehicle," lol.

You have solar. That wasn’t free and I’m sure you overpaid. So in other words you paid for all your electricity years in advance. Need to factor that into the costs of charging your EV.

Why are you so sure they over paid?

I’m looking at a solar system now that will be out of pocket about 40k and save me between 300 and 350 on my electric bill per month. This leads to about a 10% return on my cash investment, double what a savings account is paying right now.

I’m not sure I’ll pull the trigger, but I am keen to understand why solar is, by default, over priced?

It's similar to how most people who buy cars think they got a good deal. Most haven't but the salespeople do their jobs well in making you think you got a good deal. Solar panels are no different. IF you install your panels yourself then you have better chance of actually getting a good deal. Most of the profit margin is on the installation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know, but it sure seems to, though it isn't why we got one. We also have solar, so that lowers the cost of home charging. I say it seems to because the only costs are purchase price and electricity, which is pennies whereas filling the gas tank is $50-$100 2-3 times per month, and gas doesn't last as long. We rarely need to fully charge the EV, and rarely drop below 40% -- usually its around 70%, and we keep it at the recommended 80% expect for longer trips.

The difference in time (and money) spent on "car stuff" is something we hadn't anticipated making a difference to us, but the EV to hybrid car ownership experience for us is like the difference between a native plant in the right place compared to an exotic, fussy, non-native in a less than ideal spot - so much more work for the hybrid. Once we got used to the EV, the time spent on little things for the hybrid, like getting gas, oil changes, inspections, maintenance issues, became extra annoying simply because we never have to do it for the EV. So now we fuss over who has to deal with the "primitive vehicle," lol.

You have solar. That wasn’t free and I’m sure you overpaid. So in other words you paid for all your electricity years in advance. Need to factor that into the costs of charging your EV.

Why are you so sure they over paid?

I’m looking at a solar system now that will be out of pocket about 40k and save me between 300 and 350 on my electric bill per month. This leads to about a 10% return on my cash investment, double what a savings account is paying right now.

I’m not sure I’ll pull the trigger, but I am keen to understand why solar is, by default, over priced?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most energy- and cost-efficient car you can buy is likely the new Prius, or the Prius Prime.

(The Prius Prime you can plug into a normal outlet, get 30 miles or so of all-electric range, and if you go farther than that, the gasoline engine kicks in and it becomes a regular hybrid.)

As someone who owns the new Prius Prime, yes.

I have visited a gas station just a few times since getting it last summer. Weather depending, I have 49 miles on a charge. 95% of the time its an EV.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard a news story this weekend where they took a bunch of these questions to experts (academics etc) and all the answers favored EVs.

They said even if you already own an ICE, EVs are so much more efficient that just from an environmental perspective you’d be better off buying a new EV than driving a used ICE (of course they said that probably doesn’t make sense to do for lots of other reasons).

Kind of amazing how successful the petroleum industry has been in spreading FUD about EVs.

Wouldn’t driving a compact ICE/hybrid be better for the environment than an enormous and heavy EV like a rivian?

Anonymous wrote:Heard a news story this weekend where they took a bunch of these questions to experts (academics etc) and all the answers favored EVs.

They said even if you already own an ICE, EVs are so much more efficient that just from an environmental perspective you’d be better off buying a new EV than driving a used ICE (of course they said that probably doesn’t make sense to do for lots of other reasons).

Kind of amazing how successful the petroleum industry has been in spreading FUD about EVs.