Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
NP
Agree that it is annoying to be asked for evidence when you make a claim. Super annoying, especially when you can't.
The point is that the "be specific" poster never accepts or even acknowledges evidence presented. So they just derail and derail.
As someone who is also to the left politically, I recognize that poster substantially weakens the argument of their side every time they lost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The "$400k HHI is middle class!" DCUM-er
it's not?
For people who grew up MC, $400k in the DC area sure doesn’t feel that much different. Still just a cog in the machine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
NP
Agree that it is annoying to be asked for evidence when you make a claim. Super annoying, especially when you can't.
The point is that the "be specific" poster never accepts or even acknowledges evidence presented. So they just derail and derail.
As someone who is also to the left politically, I recognize that poster substantially weakens the argument of their side every time they lost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The "$400k HHI is middle class!" DCUM-er
it's not?
For people who grew up MC, $400k in the DC area sure doesn’t feel that much different. Still just a cog in the machine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Men hating women posters. I didn't realize women hate men so much.
What's an example of this?
DP. I am not sure what the PP meant, but I'm a second wife and occasionally weigh on on issues related to step-children, blended families, etc. There are so many men-hating bullies who think that the dissolution of every marriage was entirely the fault of the man and that all men are terrible fathers.
DUCM women hate just about everyone - equal opportunity haters maybe. DH, MIL, FIL, DIL, SIL, neighbors, neighbors' dogs/cats/kids, teachers, old people (i.e., boomers), young people...etc. Oh, and, other women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Men hating women posters. I didn't realize women hate men so much.
What's an example of this?
DP. I am not sure what the PP meant, but I'm a second wife and occasionally weigh on on issues related to step-children, blended families, etc. There are so many men-hating bullies who think that the dissolution of every marriage was entirely the fault of the man and that all men are terrible fathers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
NP
Agree that it is annoying to be asked for evidence when you make a claim. Super annoying, especially when you can't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The poster who thinks the answer is for everyone to go to therapy.
Also any poster who assumes therapy or medication is a quick fix for anything. Both can take a long time to make things better and people who are trying to get help deserve empathy and kindness in the meantime. “Go to therapy” or “you need medication” are dismissive responses to someone with emotional pain because they ignore the fact that therapy/medication don’t offer anyone instant results.
Anonymous wrote:The poster who thinks the answer is for everyone to go to therapy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The poster who thinks the answer is for everyone to go to therapy.
There are quite a few who make it obvious they are addicted to therapy. An expensive disorder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lately it is the political leftist who keeps writing "Be specific" when making unclear demands for some form of "evidence" in political threads. We are probably on the same or similar political side but it is annoying af because that poster never actually accepts any responses. So they ask for specificity but don't do anything with it when provided other than derail conversation. It's frustrating and just stops conversation.
+1
NP
Agree that it is annoying to be asked for evidence when you make a claim. Super annoying, especially when you can't.